Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2011, 04:54 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,772,850 times
Reputation: 3774

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
That is the African American population that Houston got last decade, not the total number.
I know DANNY! He posted 16.8%, which is 999,000. I read from Houston's newspaper website that it is 17.3% which is over 1 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2011, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,041,021 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
I know DANNY! He posted 16.8%, which is 999,000. I read from Houston's newspaper website that it is 17.3% which is over 1 million.
Why does it matter if its 1 Million or 999,000 people though?

I know you're really into the more African American population is better thing (and that's fine), but really dude it doesn't matter. I'm Asian and there's only 420,000 of us in Houston and I don't have anything to complain on. Personally I'm not even that Asian oriented, only some of my friends are, most of my friends are Caucasian and some also Hispanic, and its never bothered me. I don't understand why this website is so themed to "I can only live in a place that has people of my race", it seems borderline segregationist and racist, in my opinion.

Not trying to be rude or anything, but this just doesn't make any sense why 1,000 people less is a bad thing for Houston. Houston's a place where people of any race can live successfully, as a resident of the area, that's all I care about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:04 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,772,850 times
Reputation: 3774
UM! Because maybe, I get tired of hearing stories about how ignorant we are or who have we shot or robbed. For blacks to be considering a place like Houston shows me that we are doing much better than what society says about us! That's that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
228 posts, read 537,310 times
Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
I know DANNY! He posted 16.8%, which is 999,000. I read from Houston's newspaper website that it is 17.3% which is over 1 million.
You are welcome to check my numbers yourself...I suspect the newspaper got it wrong. (edit: could you provide a link to the source that says 17.3%? I am curious about how they arrived at that figure.)

Here is the county-by-county breakdown for the Houston MSA's black population. You can verify my numbers at the following links (the data is compiled from the second link using the USCB's custom table feature and extracted into Excel):

Databases - Census 2010 in Texas - chron.com - Houston Chronicle (http://www.chron.com/databases/census2010texas-results.html - broken link)
American FactFinder

For the black population:

Harris County
2010: 754,258
2000: 619,694

Fort Bend County
2010: 123,267
2000: 69,579

Montgomery County
2010: 18,573
2000: 10,076

Brazoria County
2010: 36,880
2000: 20,183

Galveston County
2010: 39,229
2000: 38,179

Liberty County
2010: 8,074
2000: 8,952

Chambers County
2010: 2,817
2000: 2,525

Waller County
2010: 10,537
2000: 9,496

Austin County
2010: 2,622
2000: 2,475

San Jacinto County
2010: 2,662
2000: 2,796

Total Houston MSA black population:
2010: 998,919
2000: 783,955
total change = 214,964
percent of population in 2010 = 998,919/5,946,800 = 16.8%
percent of population in 2000 = 783,955/4,715,407 = 16.6%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
228 posts, read 537,310 times
Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by justme02 View Post
Great data! What about Chicago?
Unfortunately since Wisconsin data is not available, I can't do a full analysis of the Chicago data. But, here it is, minus Kenosha County, WI.

Chicago MSA (minus Kenosha County, WI): pop. 9,294,679
Total change: 345,940
White: -195,615 (54.6% down from 58.9%)
Hispanic: 453,542 (20.8% up from 16.6%)
Asian: 137,691 (5.6% up from 4.3%)
Black: -81,043 (17.2% down from 18.8%)
Two or more: -70,119 (1.4% up from 2.2%)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Northridge, Los Angeles, CA
2,684 posts, read 7,381,706 times
Reputation: 2411
Quote:
Originally Posted by justme02 View Post
Actually it looks like the data posted is correct based on the 2010 census. I calculated DFW's on the new data and it came up almost the same (the only difference was I had the White population just under 50% and the Hispanic population a little higher, but that could be bad math on my part). I used the following link:

Databases - Census 2010 in Texas - chron.com - Houston Chronicle (http://www.chron.com/databases/Census2010Texas.html - broken link)
The 2010 census hasn't even released the official demographic results (otherwise, we'd see a thread on it already), so how would Brookings (which is NOTORIOUS for being too secondary source heavy) have access to this information before our own government? And how would the Houston Chronicle have the official US census demographic results yet before the US census even analyzed it?

I mean, this is a good tool for now, but again, its all conjecture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,041,021 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifeshadower View Post
so how would Brookings (which is NOTORIOUS for being too secondary source heavy) have access to this information before our own government?
Psychic, they are.

LOL @ Brookings Institution though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
228 posts, read 537,310 times
Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
I know DANNY! He posted 16.8%, which is 999,000. I read from Houston's newspaper website that it is 17.3% which is over 1 million.
I just realized what may be causing the discrepancy: I am using the "black alone" population in my count (just as with the other races--Asian alone, white alone, etc.). If you use the "black in combination with other races" the overall black number is over 1 million. Just for Harris County:

2010, black (and any other race): 775,492
2010, black alone: 754,258

However, using these numbers is, in my opinion, a bit misleading. The "white" percentage in Harris County would then be over 58% using those numbers.

Last edited by feconi; 02-26-2011 at 05:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
228 posts, read 537,310 times
Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifeshadower View Post
The 2010 census hasn't even released the official demographic results (otherwise, we'd see a thread on it already), so how would Brookings (which is NOTORIOUS for being too secondary source heavy) have access to this information before our own government? And how would the Houston Chronicle have the official US census demographic results yet before the US census even analyzed it?

I mean, this is a good tool for now, but again, its all conjecture.
The numbers I have are straight from the Census Bureau, not from the Houston Chronicle and definitely not from Brookings (I couldn't get anything but Texas data from the Chronicle, anyway). I simply provide those references for those who are interested. The Brookings website was mentioned to provide a comparison between official 2010 data and 2009 estimates. Let me reiterate--none of my data comes from their site.

These numbers are not "conjecture," and I'm not sure at all why you think they might be. The only problem here might be my own errors (i.e., retyping numbers to this website or not using the current MSA definitions). You can find any of this information yourself by going to the Census Bureau's website.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2011, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
228 posts, read 537,310 times
Reputation: 147
A few more...

Baltimore MSA: pop. 2,710,489
Total change 2000-2010: 157,495
White: -66,652 (60.0% down from 66.3%)
Hispanic: 72,425 (4.6% up from 2.0%)
Asian: 53,280 (4.5% up from 2.7%)
Black: 69,679 (28.4% up from 27.4%)
Two or more: 17,573 (2.1% up from 1.5%)

Salt Lake City MSA: pop. 1,124,197
Total change: 155,339
White: 53,769 (74.9% down from 81.4%)
Hispanic: 73,459 (16.6% up from 11.7%)
Asian: 10,281 (3.0% up from 2.5%)
Black: 5,016 (1.3% up from 1.0%)
Two or more: -3,460 (1.9% up from 2.5%)

Indianapolis MSA: pop. 1,756,241
Total change: 231,137
White: 81,074 (74.6% down from 80.6%)
Hispanic: 66,715 (6.2% up from 2.7%)
Asian: 19,755 (2.2% up from 1.3%)
Black: 45,866 (14.8% up from 14.1%)
Two or more: 11,497 (1.8% up from 1.3%)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top