Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: SF Bay Area's position.
#2, Ahead of Washington 44 14.15%
#3, After Washington 39 12.54%
Neither 228 73.31%
Voters: 311. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:38 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,496,781 times
Reputation: 5879

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
Uh... did you just say that SF is close to rivaling ATL, Houston, Miami, Detroit, Dallas and Boston? And you have the nerve to call us delusional? SF clearly > all of the above. The only one that's even remotely debatable is Philly.
can you read? he said closer. meaning it can be above *or* below. ...but they are in the same league.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,450,086 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
Wait, so your argument is that without the GGB SF would be significantly less recognizable? What do you think Paris would be without the Eiffel Tower?
Paris has some of the most unique architecture on the planet. Along with landmarks like the Lourve, Champs Élysées, and the Arc de Triomphe, I think people would be able to recognize Paris.

Quote:
And what's your metric for saying that the list is incorrect? If your main argument is GDP then why are you lumping in Berlin (a city with a GDP 200 billion dollars less than SF) with HK and Tokyo? It's even a class below San Francisco on the GaWC list of world cities.
It's also the capital city of the fourth largest economy on the planet...in terms of an economic contribution, it certainly is not on the level of the San Francisco Bay. I think you could actually make an argument for Berlin and SF to be on the same level. I guess I was focusing on the political influence and cultural offerings.

Quote:
Some of your arguments are pretty thin.
Such as?

Quote:
And you sounded jealous because in your previous post you were basically stating that they're not comparable on any level.
What? Paris and San Francisco? They aren't comparable. As I said before, I guess they do share some similarities, but they are nowhere near the same level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:43 PM
 
Location: The Bay
6,914 posts, read 14,744,821 times
Reputation: 3120
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
can you read? he said closer. meaning it can be above *or* below. ...but they are in the same league.

Yes, I can read. Miami, Houston, Detroit and Dallas are more than clearly not in the same league as San Francisco. ATL and Boston can be argued better city-wise, but their metros not so much.

I'm beginning to wonder if any of you (other than grapico) have left your bedrooms, let alone the east coast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:44 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,450,086 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
Uh... did you just say that SF is close to rivaling ATL, Houston, Miami, Detroit, Dallas and Boston? And you have the nerve to call us delusional? SF clearly > all of the above. The only one that's even remotely debatable is Philly.
While I would place San Francisco over cities like Houston, Philly and Boston, it's by no means a landslide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:46 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,888,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
Yes, I can read. Miami, Houston, Detroit and Dallas are more than clearly not in the same league as San Francisco. ATL and Boston can be argued better city-wise, but their metros not so much.

I'm beginning to wonder if any of you (other than grapico) have left your bedrooms, let alone the east coast.
Well I for one lived in SF; also DC, NYC and Philly

Love all these cities but claims in this thread are beyond rediculous. I actually in the real world speak extremely highly of SF; but to read this garbage is almost sickening
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:46 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
1,405 posts, read 2,448,766 times
Reputation: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
Talk about nonsensical. If you're trying to argue that San Francisco is globally less important than Berlin then you're dead wrong on all counts.


Why you're even interjecting Philly into this conversation is


And New Yorkers use the argument you're accusing us of using all the time... "the stock exchange takes place in New York City so that makes NY the financial center of the universe! Never mind that most of our debt is owned by China and most of the shareholders are outside of NY." Why do you only take issue with it when its used for the Bay Area?


And you're 100% delusional if you think the Bay Area does not compare to LA or Chicago.
You can't be serious.

Lol at you thinking the stock exchange just "takes place" here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:47 PM
 
Location: The Bay
6,914 posts, read 14,744,821 times
Reputation: 3120
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Paris has some of the most unique architecture on the planet. Along with landmarks like the Lourve, Champs Élysées, and the Arc de Triomphe, I think people would be able to recognize Paris.
And you don't think people would be able to recognize San Francisco? Seriously?

Quote:
It's also the capital city of the fourth largest economy on the planet...in terms of an economic contribution, it certainly is not on the level of the San Francisco Bay. I think you could actually make an argument for Berlin and SF to be on the same level. I guess I was focusing on the political influence and cultural offerings.
It's not on the economic level of San Francisco city, let alone the San Francisco Bay.

Quote:
Such as?
Such as the two points you were trying to make above.

Quote:
What? Paris and San Francisco? They aren't comparable. As I said before, I guess they do share some similarities, but they are nowhere near the same level.
I never claimed they were equals. However, in some aspects they are comparable. This is what I said before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:47 PM
 
Location: NY/FL
818 posts, read 1,386,926 times
Reputation: 421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
Yes, I can read. Miami, Houston, Detroit and Dallas are more than clearly not in the same league as San Francisco. ATL and Boston can be argued better city-wise, but their metros not so much.

I'm beginning to wonder if any of you (other than grapico) have left your bedrooms, let alone the east coast.
Have you ever left the bay? Seriously with all these delusional remarks..

Detroit is still one of the most important cities sure I think SF is more important but they are still in same tier. Houston, Boston, Philly, Atlanta all have industries SF doesnt top them in, energy, education, airline, federal mint... while I do think SF is slightly more important it is by no means a runaway
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:51 PM
 
Location: The Bay
6,914 posts, read 14,744,821 times
Reputation: 3120
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
While I would place San Francisco over cities like Houston, Philly and Boston, it's by no means a landslide.

It definitely is a landslide over Detroit, Miami and Dallas. Why Infamous Past would even assert that they're on the same level as San Francisco is beyond me.


And Houston gets made into a lot more than it actually is here... its not on the level of Dallas or Atlanta, let alone San Francisco.


I already said that Boston and Philly are arguable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2011, 11:53 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,450,086 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Is that what you call it. "Objectivity"?

LOL...okay.


No, but BILLIONS of people around the world use our websites everyday for a myriad of reasons. Nowhere else on this planet even comes close to recieving the web traffic our sites do.

People my pretend that this is unimpressive, but we're laughing all the way to the bank.
I'm going to have to echo Grapico....when did these become your websites? Stop smoking crack. You're reminding me of Charie...not Sheen, but Charlie from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia:

Hulu - It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia: Charlie Loses His Mind

Montclair's got boxes full of Pepe!

Last edited by tmac9wr; 03-04-2011 at 12:02 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top