U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2011, 06:21 AM
 
Location: South St Louis
3,766 posts, read 1,933,949 times
Reputation: 1821
Default Suburb that surpasses the core city in population

How rare is the situation where a city's suburb grows so large that it actually exceeds the main city in population? And if this happens, how would it affect the core city? Does the official name of the metro area automatically change?

The only MSA I can come up with where this may have occurred is Hampton Roads. If I'm not mistaken, Norfolk used to be the biggest city there, and then nearby Virginia Beach grew and grew until it overshadowed Norfolk in population. Now, VB comes first in the MSA's name.

Are there other examples? What other cities have suburbs that could possibly surpass the main city in population?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2011, 06:26 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,180 posts, read 4,515,196 times
Reputation: 4047
Besides the example you used, I don't think its ever happened before. Fort Worth, Baltimore, San Jose, Oakland, Saint Paul, Fort Lauderdale, are not suburbs people, therefore them surpassing their neighbors doesn't qualify for what you're asking, I believe. In the case of Baltimore, its not even in the same metro as Washington DC, they're two distinct and independent cities, haha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Jersey City
4,710 posts, read 9,369,006 times
Reputation: 3074
That's is the only place I know of where that has happened.

There are other places where it could happen if conditions were the same as in Norfolk/Va Beach. For example, if Fairfax County, VA incorporated itself into an independent city (the same way Princess Anne County incorporated itself into the City of Virginia Beach in the '60s), it would be larger in population than Washington DC. You could therefore have a Fairfax-Washington-etc. MSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 11:22 AM
 
Location: The City
18,912 posts, read 15,455,328 times
Reputation: 5510
In aggregate virtually all suburbs surpass the population of the city; even in NYC though no single municipality would come close in that example
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
24,850 posts, read 31,297,595 times
Reputation: 10530
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
In aggregate virtually all suburbs surpass the population of the city; even in NYC though no single municipality would come close in that example
That's basically it.

When we compare any principal city to the sum of its suburbs, the burbs far outsize the cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 12:39 PM
 
294 posts, read 361,095 times
Reputation: 206
What about San Jose? It was originally a suburb and is now bigger in population than San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
7,495 posts, read 8,943,839 times
Reputation: 3043
I think all cities have had thier collective suburbs blow by them in population. It may not be a single incorported city but it's still a suburb.

For example, St Louis County (1 million) is a suburb of St Louis City (350k) even though the largest actual incorporated city in StL County is only 50-60k, it's one continuously developed suburb of StL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 12:49 PM
 
940 posts, read 945,716 times
Reputation: 664
Thousand Oaks (130,000) is a "suburb" of Ventura (110,000) because it's in the same county.. but really TO is a suburb of LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 01:38 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,608 posts, read 9,875,301 times
Reputation: 2559
Quote:
Originally Posted by overunder12 View Post
What about San Jose? It was originally a suburb and is now bigger in population than San Francisco.
Nope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2011, 02:16 PM
 
Location: EAST-SIDE INDIANAPOLIS
355 posts, read 462,536 times
Reputation: 147
Wouldn't alot of possible cities be ones that have failed to expand city limits, examples included St. Louis, New Orleans, Miami, Boston, San Fran, cities that have usually been around a long time but didnt expand the way say my city of indianapolis did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top