U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Thanksgiving Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2011, 09:58 PM
 
135 posts, read 224,168 times
Reputation: 41

Advertisements

With all the terrible natural disasters in the news these days, I'm growing more and more concerned about being safe from floods, tsunamis, earthquakes and other natural perils. Where do you think we are safest from such disasters in America?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,732 posts, read 4,483,413 times
Reputation: 767
Probably in the middle of the country, which is also the most boring place in the entire nation IMO. Sometimes you just have to take chances and worrying about natural disasters is kind've like a paranoia problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
1,290 posts, read 1,265,185 times
Reputation: 1097
Quote:
Originally Posted by clean_polo View Post
Probably in the middle of the country, which is also the most boring place in the entire nation IMO. Sometimes you just have to take chances and worrying about natural disasters is kind've like a paranoia problem.
What a dumb generalization. I lived in a large Colorado city for 10 years, snuggled right up to the mountains, which was neither boring nor in danger of any natural disasters.

Hurricanes- obviously not. This one's self-explanatory.
Tornadoes- not where I lived...was close enough to the mountains to avoid them.
Earthquakes- nope, not near a faultline.
Floods- doesn't rain enough!
Tsunamis- again, self-explanatory
Blizzards/Freezing Rain- none this year.
Fire- only in a severe drought year, but it's rare to have major wildfires.

Think I covered it! There are areas in the "boring middle of the country", perhaps more in the midwest, that have major flooding problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
13,440 posts, read 14,799,446 times
Reputation: 5037
So you people in Colorado are not worried about Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,732 posts, read 4,483,413 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by wag more bark less View Post
What a dumb generalization. I lived in a large Colorado city for 10 years, snuggled right up to the mountains, which was neither boring nor in danger of any natural disasters.

Hurricanes- obviously not. This one's self-explanatory.
Tornadoes- not where I lived...was close enough to the mountains to avoid them.
Earthquakes- nope, not near a faultline.
Floods- doesn't rain enough!
Tsunamis- again, self-explanatory
Blizzards/Freezing Rain- none this year.
Fire- only in a severe drought year, but it's rare to have major wildfires.

Think I covered it! There are areas in the "boring middle of the country", perhaps more in the midwest, that have major flooding problems.
You basically proved what I said though. Ok, where you lived might not have been boring in your opinion, but it's also one of the least prone areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2011, 11:22 PM
 
3,973 posts, read 7,274,752 times
Reputation: 1576
Yellowstone can and will be a major hazard, but the odds are slim. We are talking intervals of 1-2 million year events.

The midwest is actually in a window of 200-400 years with the New Madrid fault. A serious quake there would effect much of the midsouth and midwest, certainly Memphis, St. Louis, and beyond.

My understanding is the inland areas of Southern Oregon may be the safest from natural disasters. Few quakes, outside the tsunami zone, no floods, no tornadoes, no hurricanes. Medford, OR anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
1,290 posts, read 1,265,185 times
Reputation: 1097
Quote:
Originally Posted by clean_polo View Post
You basically proved what I said though. Ok, where you lived might not have been boring in your opinion, but it's also one of the least prone areas.
Ohh, so you're saying that having the lack of natural disasters makes a place boring Got it.

And Colorado isn't the midwest..although I didn't know that about the San Madrid fault in the area...I interpret the question more about annual disaster danger, like hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 10:07 PM
 
Location: Oregon
292 posts, read 367,459 times
Reputation: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by pw72 View Post
Yellowstone can and will be a major hazard, but the odds are slim. We are talking intervals of 1-2 million year events.

The midwest is actually in a window of 200-400 years with the New Madrid fault. A serious quake there would effect much of the midsouth and midwest, certainly Memphis, St. Louis, and beyond.

My understanding is the inland areas of Southern Oregon may be the safest from natural disasters. Few quakes, outside the tsunami zone, no floods, no tornadoes, no hurricanes. Medford, OR anyone?
I was thinking of same thing! Southern Oregon and Northern California (Redding) seemed to be the safest area to be in. Nothing, earthquake is a MAYBE, it is surrounded by solid mountains (no lava underneath it unlike volcano mountains), it is well protected areas. Eastern Oregon gets my vote too. Nevada too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
637 posts, read 790,600 times
Reputation: 208
I would say the far north of Minnesota. Though they get a lot of snow. Maybe the Appalachians? Or Vermont..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2011, 10:19 PM
 
6,642 posts, read 3,574,742 times
Reputation: 3872
AZ...NM pretty safe also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top