Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: New Orleans vs San Francisco
San Francisco 262 57.71%
New Orleans 192 42.29%
Voters: 454. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-28-2013, 09:10 AM
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,438 posts, read 44,044,945 times
Reputation: 16778

Advertisements

Posters are insulting 18Montclair's intelligence. Now I've seen everything.
BTW, the East Bay is no bargain anymore, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2013, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,472,171 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by LovinDecatur View Post
Posters are insulting 18Montclair's intelligence. Now I've seen everything.
LOL I don't take it personal. It's because they can't actually debate what I'm saying.

Quote:
BTW, the East Bay is no bargain anymore, either.
Unfortunately for middle income families, this is true.

According to Trulia, the median sale price for a 4-bedroom house in the city of Oakland from Aug-Nov 2013 is $765,000-Oakland, the city almost universally lambasted by media outlets for crime, drugs, ebonics, anarchists, occupy etc and the verbal whipping boy of inland racists/rednecks/neocons, costs $765,000 for the average 4-bd house. Ironically for San Jose it's 'only' $720,000 That's because Oakland's expensive areas really sway the stats up. You can find 4-bd homes in hood areas in the 400-500K range but that isn't for everyone.

Actually the typical 4-bd house is really quite expensive anywhere in the immediate Oakland Area:
Median Sale Price, 4-bd house:
Piedmont $1,407,500
Berkeley $1,177,500
Kensington $1,095,000
Alameda $854,000
Albany $785,000
Oakland $765,000
San Leandro $635,000

The East Bay is a bargain compared to SF perhaps, but is still way more expensive on average than 99% of the rest of the country-and that's unfortunate as I said.

We need to retain our middle class imo, but they are fleeing to cheaper areas far away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 09:48 AM
 
Location: The Magnolia City
8,928 posts, read 14,328,949 times
Reputation: 4853
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
LOL I don't take it personal. It's because they can't actually debate what I'm saying.
You must be talking about someone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,472,171 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairobi View Post
You must be talking about someone else.
Yeah, I'm talking to Y.O.U. and what?

















lol *winks*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Midtown Atlanta...starting to regret it
47 posts, read 78,753 times
Reputation: 21
I'm not from either city...but as a Cali native, I can tell you that SF is a cool city. But is it much better than New Orleans? No. Especially enough to justify spending over 3 times as much to live in? Hell no!

Chilly Gentilly was spot on about New Orleans in that no other city delivers on that level while maintaining such affordability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 10:33 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,127,744 times
Reputation: 6338
Except that NOLA still lacks jobs while SF doesn't. You'll also likely live in the core of NOLA and be almost completely surrounded by poverty and VERY high crime.

NOLA is a very great city, but let's not kid ourselves and think NOLA is on SF's level. SF is a world class city that is very well rounded except for cost of living and that's because it's so desirable.

If NOLA is just this incredible city, why aren't people flocking to it by the hundreds of thousands? Because in the end, most people know the problems that lie beyond the central core.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 10:57 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,982,202 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiVegas View Post
You claimed that SF was more appealing to Europeans because it was a busier air hub.

That's an absurd statement, because airports don't build hubs based on tourists. Atlanta Hartsfield has the busiest hub in the world.; so you would claim that Atlanta is the most appealing destination on earth for tourists?
No it's not an absurd statement. The true gauge of evaluating the draw of European visitors is the number of foreign airlines serving the airport, not the destinations the home hub carrier serves.

Every international city United Airlines serves from SFO has a foreign carrier competing on the same route. So YES there is a large European draw to the Bay Area. You make an excellent point when discussing Dallas, Atlanta, Detroit and other midwest/southern cities (except Chicago and Miami)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Atlanta Metro Area (OTP North)
1,901 posts, read 3,083,452 times
Reputation: 1688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Except that NOLA still lacks jobs while SF doesn't. You'll also likely live in the core of NOLA and be almost completely surrounded by poverty and VERY high crime.

NOLA is a very great city, but let's not kid ourselves and think NOLA is on SF's level. SF is a world class city that is very well rounded except for cost of living and that's because it's so desirable.

If NOLA is just this incredible city, why aren't people flocking to it by the hundreds of thousands? Because in the end, most people know the problems that lie beyond the central core.
1. This is untrue. Anyone who knows New Orleans understands fully that the "poverty and VERY high crime" are VERY specific to certain areas. And while New Orleans doesn't lack jobs to the extent you allude to, Chopin is retiring in a year, and thus isn't looking for work.

2. Your opinion and thats cool

3. With respect, thousands are flocking to New Orleans and have been for several years now. New Orleans tops fastest growing cities in America list - NBC News.com

Again, with respect, I'd expect someone from a city as flawed and inundated with misperceptions as Atlanta, you'd understand fact aside from conventional notions.

Last edited by Chilly Gentilly; 11-28-2013 at 11:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,507 posts, read 26,282,773 times
Reputation: 13288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Except that NOLA still lacks jobs while SF doesn't. You'll also likely live in the core of NOLA and be almost completely surrounded by poverty and VERY high crime.

NOLA is a very great city, but let's not kid ourselves and think NOLA is on SF's level. SF is a world class city that is very well rounded except for cost of living and that's because it's so desirable.

If NOLA is just this incredible city, why aren't people flocking to it by the hundreds of thousands? Because in the end, most people know the problems that lie beyond the central core.
Terribly lazy assessment. Have you ever been to the city?
No one is saying New Orleans is on San Francisco's level.
People are flocking to the city and it's growing by leaps and bounds, fastest in the country. These aren't former residents either, these are young professionals and families from other states.

New Orleans is so slept on, but maybe that's a good thing. Don't want to turn into any other large sunbelt city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2013, 11:13 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,127,744 times
Reputation: 6338
A city so flawed that over 2.5 million people(NEARLY DOUBLE NOLA'S CURRENT METRO POP.) have moved to the general area in the past 2 decades and continue to move here by the hundred of thousands every year. Every city has flaws. None are perfect and that certainly hold true for NOLA and you can continue saying that the crime is only segregated to certain neighborhoods, but this can be said by nearly every major city in this country. NOLA is still top 3 for Crime in not only municipal, but metro as well. That is a fact and is supported by NUMBERS. Do the google search if you want.

NOLA is very nasty and gritty outside of the central city. You're delusional if you think otherwise. You can continue to pretend as if the crime and poverty and grit and human misery don't exist in NOLA, but it does and it's VERY widespread. The higher a city is in crime, the more is spillovers into nice neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top