Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,092 times
Reputation: 6288

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gateway Region View Post
What bothers me is when people pass off a statistic as a fact. Again, numbers can be posted of diversity in any two cities and shown to a group. Every person will interpret them differently and look for different attributes, which is how each person has their own definition for diversity.
Statistics are much closer to being factual than opinions, especially extremely biased opinions like yours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:42 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,144 posts, read 1,295,279 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Statistics are much closer to being factual than opinions, especially extremely biased opinions like yours.
Yes, statistics are facts. However, how someone interprets the diversity percentages is an opinion. People see things from different angles. And yes, I am biased.... so are you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 04:47 PM
 
Location: The Bay
6,914 posts, read 14,746,084 times
Reputation: 3120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gateway Region View Post
BK overall is desirable. The only areas not desirable are the nabes with high crime, which every city/area has.

Let's hear about those so called less desirable areas of BK. Honestly, this is a call out. I am testing your knowledge of BK. The longer it takes you to reply is the longer I am assuming you are googling. And don't give me the areas everyone knows such as Brownsville, ENY, Crown Heights and Bed-Stuy. Give me some info the average person doesnt know, honestly I dont think much time was spent there.

That's not difficult...

Marcy Avenue/South Williamsburg
Bushwick
East Flatbush
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,092 times
Reputation: 6288
Let's hear about those so called less desirable areas of BK. Honestly, this is a call out. I am testing your knowledge of BK. The longer it takes you to reply is the longer I am assuming you are googling.

People have to google facts about Brooklyn since it's so under the radar next to a world-class city like San Francisco. You could post pictures of the Bronx or Queens and tell people (even NYers) it's Brooklyn and they'd agree. Try doing that with SF. Amazing how a metro of 22 million people can be so dependent on a tiny 23 sq mile island.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,092 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gateway Region View Post
Yes, statistics are facts. However, how someone interprets the diversity percentages is an opinion. People see things from different angles. And yes, I am biased.... so are you.
And? You interpret percentages that show Alameda Co. is more diverse than Brooklyn and conclude that Brooklyn is more diverse. Even mental patients have powers of interpretation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:17 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,144 posts, read 1,295,279 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nineties Flava View Post
That's not difficult...

Marcy Avenue/South Williamsburg
Bushwick
East Flatbush
Williamsburg is the one of the most popular nabes along with BK heights and Bushwich/Flatbush are again popular among rappers and speaking of the ghettos.

However, I am not saying you do or do not know much about BK. I was trying to call someone out who knows nothing about BK. Exatly as suspected, never got a response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:19 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,144 posts, read 1,295,279 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Let's hear about those so called less desirable areas of BK. Honestly, this is a call out. I am testing your knowledge of BK. The longer it takes you to reply is the longer I am assuming you are googling.

Quote:
People have to google facts about Brooklyn since it's so under the radar next to a world-class city like San Francisco.
Then why is that Cali poster running his mouth and trashing BK if he knows nothing of it?

You could post pictures of the Bronx or Queens and tell people (even NYers) it's Brooklyn and they'd agree. Try doing that with SF. Amazing how a metro of 22 million people can be so dependent on a tiny 23 sq mile island.
SF is a metro area of 9 million and they depend on the 800,000 in SF. Same goes for SF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:20 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,144 posts, read 1,295,279 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
And? You interpret percentages that show Alameda Co. is more diverse than Brooklyn and conclude that Brooklyn is more diverse. Even mental patients have powers of interpretation.
BK is more diverse than Alameda county in Cali, sorry. That is my opinion and I stick to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:22 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,112,206 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gateway Region View Post
SF is a metro area of 9 million and they depend on the 800,000 in SF. Same goes for SF.

9 million, wow its grown very recently. Or is this an opinion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2011, 05:28 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,144 posts, read 1,295,279 times
Reputation: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
9 million, wow its grown very recently. Or is this an opinion?
I thought it was 9 million. Sorry, I was thinking of Chicago which is a much more urban and larger metro. SF Bay Area is exactly 7,427,757. Oh, dfw is still hick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top