Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What NYC does have, exclusively above every other area in this country, is that acceptance and apathy granted only by the extreme population crush of often radically difference philosophies/religions/lifestyles. It also has extreme parochialism in an area that doesn't deserve it. It manifests as cringing displays of public ignorance in The New Yorker, when editorial staff try to dimly understand other areas of the nation.
And I understand everyone in the city is forced to read New Yorker or socialize with its editorial staff? C'mon. It's a free country. You are talking parochailism pay attention to Chicago press productions, both Sun-Times and Chicago Tribune. You want apathy? Come to Chicago. The city where people believe they do not deserve not-corrupt governmentand do not need term limits for its elected officials.
They just want to be given their due as to Chicago's achievements and contributions to all things urban and cultural-- which like it or not-- are undeniable and aplenty. .
BigLake, to make this discussion vaulable you have to start supporting your claims with some evidence or examples. You have to understand that what is undeniable for you for someone else is simply not. For starters, rework your statement to include some examples of Chicago's contributions. We all know the first skyskraper was there but tall buildings are not what defines the city, if it was the case we would all bow to Dubai. So, what exactly are Chicagos contributions to "all things urban and cultural"?
And I understand everyone in the city is forced to read New Yorker or socialize with its editorial staff? C'mon. It's a free country. You are talking parochailism pay attention to Chicago press productions, both Sun-Times and Chicago Tribune. You want apathy? Come to Chicago. The city where people believe they do not deserve not-corrupt governmentand do not need term limits for its elected officials.
BigLake, to make this discussion vaulable you have to start supporting your claims with some evidence or examples. You have to understand that what is undeniable for you for someone else is simply not. For starters, rework your statement to include some examples of Chicago's contributions. We all know the first skyskraper was there but tall buildings are not what defines the city, if it was the case we would all bow to Dubai. So, what exactly are Chicagos contributions to "all things urban and cultural"?
dementor-- Do not tell me what I need to do or do not need to do. We have all given you facts but you continue to ignorantly deny and/or skew and/or ignore them based on your own personal needs. I'm not going to be your shill to overcome your bias against Chicago. Not interested in wasting my time anymore.
Here's a clue for you. Try Google. Search on world's greatest architecture, world's great museum cities, etc., etc., Hell, even look up Chicago on wikipedia and read what it says there.
Quit harassing people and try making yourself presentable and accountable. I think you have some serious social problems and issues dealing with humans. Until you get that cleared, do not address me again.
dementor-- Do not tell me what I need to do or do not need to do.
Someone has to teach you how and other Chicagons to argue in a civilized, non-Midwestern way: support your claim with evidence. Not a link to a website but instead post some evidence, data.
Do not start your opinions with "everybody knows", "undoubtebly" or "obviously". Again, what is obvious for you may not be obvious for someone else.
You want to talk about being presentable and accountable when all you can do is to post inflated claims and mistake wishful thinking for reality. Get a life!
dementor-- Do not tell me what I need to do or do not need to do. We have all given you facts but you continue to ignorantly deny and/or skew and/or ignore them based on your own personal needs. I'm not going to be your shill to overcome your bias against Chicago. Not interested in wasting my time anymore.
Here's a clue for you. Try Google. Search on world's greatest architecture, world's great museum cities, etc., etc., Hell, even look up Chicago on wikipedia and read what it says there.
Quit harassing people and try making yourself presentable and accountable. I think you have some serious social problems and issues dealing with humans. Until you get that cleared, do not address me again.
Oh lets compare and contrast both just by their intro on wikipedia
What is it with you people? Can you find nothing better to do than fight and antagonize? I would guess that if many other New Yorkers knew the way you acted they'd be pretty embarrassed at the level of insecurity you have exhibited in your bashing of Chicago. It's really astonishing.
What the hell does it matter to you if Chicago is viewed as a great city. Are you that small and insecure that you see it as an afront? Go back and read the entire thread. You will see that Chicagoans are simply defending what's theres.
I've already extracted myself from this thread.
Last edited by BigLake; 03-02-2009 at 03:37 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.