Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2011, 01:58 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,583,593 times
Reputation: 4283

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor123 View Post
Another topic i was surprised had never been started.
what cities would u say r currently low in population (below 150,000-100,000, more or less) but are going to be (or just could be) major cities (not necessarily cosmopolitan) in the future? based on growth rates, amount of businesses starting up/HQ'ing there, etc.

The only one i could think of is maybe Stamford, CT-the city already has a better skyline than major cities like virginia beach and san antonio, and has many different neighborhoods.

what small cities today could be BIG in the future???
There are no cities below 150,000 that will go "major" within
the next 50 years.......none!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2011, 03:32 PM
 
Location: An Island off the coast of North America
449 posts, read 1,132,664 times
Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
There are no cities below 150,000 that will go "major" within
the next 50 years.......none!!!
how come?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2011, 03:44 PM
 
Location: An Island off the coast of North America
449 posts, read 1,132,664 times
Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Probably better ranked as 35th, but at this point is probably mid-sized. I would not call Austin major at this point but also would not consider it small either

Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
yeah my mistake...there are a lot of San Antonio-style cities out there. (a san antonio city is a city IMO that includes 99% of its metro area in the city proper, and so they get viewed as being much bigger cities then they really are, but when it comes to metropolitan populations they only have about twice their populations, while cities like Atlanta and DC increase by tenfold) i didnt see austin as one of them but i guess it could be
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2011, 09:51 PM
 
1,953 posts, read 3,878,032 times
Reputation: 1102
Virginia needs to step up its game. There's really no reason why its cities shouldn't be bigger than they are now. It's weird, considering the state to the north (MD) and the state to the south (NC) both have major well-known cities. Alright, Virginia Beach has a decent-sized population, but I don't think many people really think of it as a "big city."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2011, 11:04 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,925,770 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Probably better ranked as 35th, but at this point is probably mid-sized. I would not call Austin major at this point but also would not consider it small either

Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does anyone know if nashville added a county or land area - I am surprised it grew by over 20% at the MSA level over the last 10 years - very impressive
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2011, 11:28 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,165,301 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
There are no cities below 150,000 that will go "major" within
the next 50 years.......none!!!
As a reference, Raleigh was about 150,000 in 1980 and its county was about 300K. Now, the city of Raleigh is a tad over 400,000 and its county is over 900,000. Its largest suburb, Cary, is now close to the size that Raleigh was 30 years ago. In the next 20 years, the Raleigh/Cary MSA is projected to be the fastest growing metro in the nation. Wake County will probably be tipping 1.5 million and the 3 county MSA (excluding Durham and Chapel Hill) is projected to be pushing 1.9 Million. The core city of Raleigh will probably be 600,000+ while Cary will easily cross the 200,000 mark.

A lot can happen in 50 years to the right small city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 12:10 AM
 
1,415 posts, read 1,094,590 times
Reputation: 853
Little Rock, AR
Wichita, KS
Lexington, KY
Des Moines, IA
Eugene, OR
Bakersfield, CA
Madison, WS
Springfield, MO
Beaumont, TX
Corpus Christi, TX
Chattanooga, TN
Columbia, SC

Last edited by nedergras; 05-17-2011 at 12:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 12:16 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,312,844 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by nedergras View Post
Little Rock, AR

Beaumont, TX
\
Little Rock, yes.

Beaumont, could never see it because of Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 12:43 AM
 
1,415 posts, read 1,094,590 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by annie_himself View Post
Little Rock, yes.

Beaumont, could never see it because of Houston.
You'd be surprised, let's say a locomotive or automobile manufacturer decided to open operations in Beaumont due to it's proximity to a port, cheap land, low labor wages, etc... then it has the possibility of becoming much bigger than it is now. Not as big as Houston, though it has potential of becoming as big as New Orleans was pre-Katrina.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2011, 01:39 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,312,844 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by nedergras View Post
You'd be surprised, let's say a locomotive or automobile manufacturer decided to open operations in Beaumont due to it's proximity to a port, cheap land, low labor wages, etc... then it has the possibility of becoming much bigger than it is now. Not as big as Houston, though it has potential of becoming as big as New Orleans was pre-Katrina.
Why would they move to Beaumont versus Houston (or its suburbs), its port, cheap land, and low labor wages. I can't see it becoming as big as New Orleans, maybe Baton Rouge. I mean as long as I'm alive, it could be Houston's size in a few generations but then again anything can happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top