U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 02:51 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
8,569 posts, read 9,572,542 times
Reputation: 4349
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliSon View Post
maybe because you're looking at the basin have you ever thought of that? It's like 5 times larger than SD of course there's going to be more sprawl, why are are you saying such obvious things
If I hadn't been thinking of the LA basin then I wouldn't have made that statement genius, talk about stating the obvious. I stated that because clearly one of your fellow Angeleno's didn't understand how SD is less sprawly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 04-13-2012, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles
6,168 posts, read 2,084,597 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
Aside from density what other aspects to they have in common as far as development? Like I said, a lot of the Bay Area sprawl backs up to open space. The San Jose/Santa Clara MSA is most similar to LA as it's a lot of dense sprawl spread over a large flat area. But the rest of the Bay Area's development tends to be along a long, linear, and thin strip of land. In places like Hayward/San Leandro you are never more than 2-3 miles from open space in the hills. You can be in the middle of the LA basin and have sprawl stretching wall to wall for 10 miles in either direction without any large breaks such as undeveloped hills, you won't find anywhere like that in the Bay Area or San Diego.
False. Pretty much everywhere in the basin is within 10 miles of a large open area (Griffith Park, Hollywood Hills, Kenneth Hahn, Whittier Narrows, etc.)

At a quick glance, LA and SJ share a few similarities, though SJ is much more akin to the San Gabriel Valley than the actual city of LA. There are huge differences between these areas. I live in a census tract with a density of 33k (far, far from the densest census tract - 90k) - I doubt there is any of those in SJ - and I am not piled into a house with five other families (like so many LA detractors like to make as an excuse for the high density).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 02:55 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
8,569 posts, read 9,572,542 times
Reputation: 4349
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
First off - OC is not Los Angeles. The two places could not be more different.

2nd - When you start to throw out the "Hollywood" term - I start to take you less and less seriously. Hollywood is a working class neighborhood in Los Angeles - a lot of celebs live in LA but it's not like in the 20's and 30's when they were actually concentrated in the Hollywood district.
First - OC is very much part of the LA MSA and CSA. That whole Orange Curtain state of mind stuff doesn't change that.

Second - I wasn't referring to the actual neighborhood but the Hollywood/Entertainment culture, I thought that was pretty obvious considering the context of my statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles
6,168 posts, read 2,084,597 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
First - OC is very much part of the LA MSA and CSA. That whole Orange Curtain state of mind stuff doesn't change that.

Second - I wasn't referring to the actual neighborhood but the Hollywood/Entertainment culture, I thought that was pretty obvious considering the context of my statement.
I do agree that there is some materialism here (particularly the Westside and OC )

But as a percentage it is no more than any other metro area. It's also easily avoidable - In the year and some I have lived here I have gone to the Westside once or twice, and OC zero times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 03:00 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
8,569 posts, read 9,572,542 times
Reputation: 4349
Quote:
Originally Posted by SalParadise View Post
15 Million people? Did LA county just grow 5 million in population overnight?

You are the one who characterized LA as a sprawling mess. But San Diego is the precise definition of characterless sprawl outside of downtown and hillcrest.

The LA basin in contrast has vast square miles that are urban and pedestrian freindly.
I was referring to the populations of the entire metro for both regions.

I never said that sprawly mess didn't have plenty of character so I'm not sure why you act like I did. Although plenty of it doesn't either and a lot of that "character" isn't exactly desirable to many either.

SD also has plenty of neighborhoods outside of downtown and Hillcrest with character.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 03:05 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
8,569 posts, read 9,572,542 times
Reputation: 4349
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
False. Pretty much everywhere in the basin is within 10 miles of a large open area (Griffith Park, Hollywood Hills, Kenneth Hahn, Whittier Narrows, etc.).
Maybe at the edge of that 10 mile radius, either way there is nowhere in the Bay Area or San Diego that has such a large area of dense continuous development like the LA Basin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles
6,168 posts, read 2,084,597 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I was referring to the populations of the entire metro for both regions.

I never said that sprawly mess didn't have plenty of character so I'm not sure why you act like I did. Although plenty of it doesn't either and a lot of that "character" isn't exactly desirable to many either.

SD also has plenty of neighborhoods outside of downtown and Hillcrest with character.
San Diego and Los Angeles' most urban areas look very similar - large modern apartment buildings, duplexes, some SFH thrown in for good measure - but there are about 10x (probably more) as much area that is like that in LA as in SD. Additionally LA has many more older apartment buildings - the population of LA in 1930 was 1,238,048. Much of those residences still exist in the core of LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 03:09 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
8,569 posts, read 9,572,542 times
Reputation: 4349
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
San Diego and Los Angeles' most urban areas look very similar - large modern apartment buildings, duplexes, some SFH thrown in for good measure - but there are about 10x (probably more) as much area that is like that in LA as in SD. Additionally LA has many more older apartment buildings - the population of LA in 1930 was 1,238,048. Much of those residences still exist in the core of LA.
I never said it didn't and I already stated that it does and should considering how much larger it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles
6,168 posts, read 2,084,597 times
Reputation: 1635
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I never said it didn't and I already stated that it does and should considering how much larger it is.
The point being that it is ridiculous that people complain about LA's sprawl but then excuse it or ignore it in SD - where it is much less sustainable and PT access is much worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
1,046 posts, read 518,290 times
Reputation: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I was referring to the populations of the entire metro for both regions.

I never said that sprawly mess didn't have plenty of character so I'm not sure why you act like I did. Although plenty of it doesn't either and a lot of that "character" isn't exactly desirable to many either.

SD also has plenty of neighborhoods outside of downtown and Hillcrest with character.
Ok...if you lump Orange County with LA than LA can claim to have air quality as good as San Diego.

You pick and choose as you see fit to suit your particualr argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top