Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Philadelphia or Boston?
Philadelphia 99 48.77%
Boston 104 51.23%
Voters: 203. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista
2,471 posts, read 4,017,847 times
Reputation: 2212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lmkcin View Post
I'M FROM THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Twice I've written this week, NEW ENGLAND BORN AND BRED.

I have every right to make my OPINIONS known.

I like how easily accusations of Philly homerism come up and yet these same people say nothing when this guy calls Philadelphia a suburb with no cultural identity because it's too close to new york. I mean honestly. I understand the the philly boosters go too far sometimes and if you look in countless philly threads I'll be the first to call them out for it. But I really do think that a certain amount of it is just responding to the absurd levels of slander and hate leveled against the city on a daily basis here.

Guess what? Every time I say something positive about Philadelphia or defend the city doesn't mean I'm guilty of bias or being a homer, sometimes it's just the truth. Not everything positive about the city of philadelphia is a lie cooked up by C-D boosters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,679 posts, read 14,641,413 times
Reputation: 15405
To loosely quote Braveheart, the problem with Boston is it's full of Bostonians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:15 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
To loosely quote Braveheart, the problem with Boston is it's full of Bostonians.
and Phillys full of Murdurers?
your point?

*this was a JOKE, Phillies2011
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Long Beach
2,347 posts, read 2,784,244 times
Reputation: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillies2011 View Post
1787??? I think the date you're actually searching for is 1789, that's when the constitution actually goes into affect. It's signing in 1787 changes nothing and for awhile there was a lot of uncertainty over whether the document would ever govern this country.

Besides if you really want to get down to it, Pennsylvania is a commonwealth, so I guess it STILL isn't a slave free "state".

Those who operate in reality though of course know that even before the constitution, Pennsylvania is one of the 13 original states... you know the ones that the name of this country refers to. Haha i mean if there were no states until 1789, naming this country the United States of America in 1776 was very oddly prescient.

So although legally states did not reach their current form until the adoption of the constitution, Pennsylvania was very much a "state" in 1780 when it abolished slavery and upon doing so it was the first state in the country to do so. Besides even then Vermont doesn't become a state until 1791 so even if you were going by your bizzaro american history, Pennsylvania still beats Vermont in becoming a slave free state.

Vermont is the first sovereign body to outlaw slavery and that is the title that it should hold with pride. I do not wish to strip them of this accomplishment. But I did not say that Pennsylvania was the first "sovereign body" to abolish slavery, I said it was the first state and this statement is correct.

Also I notice you focused solely on this issue in your response and have apparently dropped your claims that Boston was the center of the Abolitionist movement. Perhaps even you realized how ridiculous that claim is now.
Massachusetts is a commonwealth as well...and guess what it's the same status as a state. Just a fancier name I suppose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,152,053 times
Reputation: 4053
I chose Boston, while Philadelphia is a large city it, doesn't have the global city or prominence that I feel Boston has more of with education and business. Also, Philly has to fight for prominence the Mid-Atlantic along with NYC and D.C. but Boston is the hands down most prominent city in New England and has some distance from the other large coastal cities that help it too IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista
2,471 posts, read 4,017,847 times
Reputation: 2212
Quote:
Originally Posted by lmkcin View Post
Massachusetts is a commonwealth as well...and guess what it's the same status as a state. Just a fancier name I suppose.
Yea, I was being facetious, even though the technical title of Pennsylvania is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it's still obviously one of the 50 american states. Both Massachusetts and Pennsylvania are commonwealths you're right (and to the best of my knowledge the only two states to have that title) which is yes basically another name for a state. My point was that it's not as though Pennsylvania wasn't a state until the Constitution was signed as MassVT tried to claim. Pennsylvania was a state since the creation of this country in 1776 and was a State in 1780 when it became the first state to abolish slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 10:03 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Actually I am pretty sure both VA and Kentucky are commonwealths as well though functionally there is really no difference than name AFAIK
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 10:04 PM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,781 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillies2011 View Post
(and to the best of my knowledge the only two states to have that title)
Kentucky, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_(U.S._state)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 10:17 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista
2,471 posts, read 4,017,847 times
Reputation: 2212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyman11 View Post
Kentucky, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_(U.S._state)
ahhh i had no idea. such an odd distinction to make. Kentucky was once a part of Virginia so I guess it makes sense that they share the same title. On the other hand maybe it's odd that all the other states don't have the title commonwealth. After all MA, PA, and VA and were the most important states at the time the country was created, odd that all the other states didn't follow their lead in how they were named.

Does anyone know why this distinction was made?

When I was in college I used to give history tours in Philadelphia and some foreign visitors thought that the title Commonwealth of Pennsylvania meant that the state was in some way still tied to Great Britain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 10:22 PM
 
Location: MIA/DC
1,190 posts, read 2,252,781 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillies2011 View Post
ahhh i had no idea. such an odd distinction to make. Kentucky was once a part of Virginia so I guess it makes sense that they share the same title. On the other hand maybe it's odd that all the other states don't have the title commonwealth. After all MA, PA, and VA and were the most important states at the time the country was created, odd that all the other states didn't follow their lead in how they were named.

Does anyone know why this distinction was made?

When I was in college I used to give history tours in Philadelphia and some foreign visitors thought that the title Commonwealth of Pennsylvania meant that the state was in some way still tied to Great Britain.
Don't know about Kentucky but as you said at the time VA, PA, MA were the more powerful states. At the time existed only colonies which were directly under the rule of Great Britain and the king while VA, MA, PA were granted commonwealth status as they were linked to the empire but were granted permission to rule to their own regulations if they so desired.

Currently a commonwealth holds no relevance but before the country separated from the empire it held a distinctive honor for the states that were granted commonwealth status. Once again though, I don't understand why Kentucky is included with the other three.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top