U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Chicago (from pittsburgh)
2,489 posts, read 1,970,648 times
Reputation: 1660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
The amount of tall buildings that's concentrated on the World Trade Center site will dominate the skyline.
you didn't answer my question
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
4,576 posts, read 3,541,996 times
Reputation: 1298
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForYourLungsOnly View Post
you didn't answer my question
Because of the design of newer skyscrapers. They just look more powerful and modern to me. Old 70s skyscrapers are ugly and bland. There's a big difference in the design of newer and older skyscrapers.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:43 PM
 
Location: The Magnolia City
8,937 posts, read 5,268,169 times
Reputation: 4853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
Because of the design of newer skyscrapers. They just look more powerful and modern to me. Old 70s skyscrapers are ugly and bland. There's a big difference in the design of newer and older skyscrapers.
You still can't beat history. The new World Trade Center may be even more relevant for future generations, but not those of us who are older. Of course there's the emotional significance behind the WTC, but the new towers themselves aren't as culturally relevant as the Hancock Center and the Sears Tower.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
7,732 posts, read 6,947,296 times
Reputation: 2774
I'm firmly in the John Hancock camp here.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Charlotte again!!
1,037 posts, read 944,701 times
Reputation: 472
Yeah the John Hancock looks very menacing....
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:47 PM
 
Location: NY-NJ-Philly looks down at SF and laughs at the hippies
1,152 posts, read 266,586 times
Reputation: 432
The Empire State building gets my vote.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 06:57 PM
 
346 posts, read 388,076 times
Reputation: 207
sears tower, or willis tower is it now. I wonder how many people realize that the top of the flat block roofline of the sears tower is about 400 ft taller than the top roofline of the empire state bldg. It looks wayyy taller in person than anything else, honestly chicago overall looks taller, but the sears is one huge bldg.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Aurora, Colorado
3,710 posts, read 2,993,112 times
Reputation: 2331
I can honestly say...i don't see the significants in the John Hancock Building. I like the window design, and think its unique, but I don't understand how its one of the most powerful buildings in the USA. Otherwise I'd say...

-Space Needle
-TransAmerica Pyrimid
-Crystler Building
..there are more.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 07:21 PM
 
Location: The City
18,778 posts, read 15,205,001 times
Reputation: 5421
Quote:
Originally Posted by 300zxtwinturbo View Post
sears tower, or willis tower is it now. I wonder how many people realize that the top of the flat block roofline of the sears tower is about 400 ft taller than the top roofline of the empire state bldg. It looks wayyy taller in person than anything else, honestly chicago overall looks taller, but the sears is one huge bldg.

I like this building but to me I just think there is something so pure with the Hancock Building. Chicago does have super talls that stick out (Willis, Hancock, Prudential Building (Not enough credit as it is also raw esp from Millenium park), and the new Trump. I also very much like the ESB, it is massive, especially when viewed with the base, very iconic.


Oddly the Sears (willis) looks bent at times. I snapped this on my camera a little over a year ago because it looked bent and the image caught it. Has anyone else ever noticed this up close?
Attached Thumbnails
Most Poweful looking skyscraper?-29443_1484945571504_1469848356_1298233_5648386_n.jpg  
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2011, 08:20 PM
 
816 posts, read 883,790 times
Reputation: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
I can honestly say...i don't see the significants in the John Hancock Building. I like the window design, and think its unique, but I don't understand how its one of the most powerful buildings in the USA. Otherwise I'd say...

-Space Needle
-TransAmerica Pyrimid
-Crystler Building
..there are more.
you don't see the hancock, but you see the transamerica? lol...hancock is like twice as high and all black and much wider.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top