Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which area has the most vibrant and noticeable Latin population
Chicago 28 32.18%
SF Bay 28 32.18%
DFW 31 35.63%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-03-2011, 09:07 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,103,127 times
Reputation: 4670

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
If I'm not mistaken, from reading all of those, SE GA was already under the control and influence of the British(13 colonies) and there were a few skirmishes in which the British won. Either way, my point still stand ragarding ATL and SA. The Spaniards pretty much controlled everything from the Florida Panhandle throughout the Southern portions of modern day AL, LA, on West. Everywhere else was Angloland, or Angleterre(England in French.)
That why i'm posting out the difference between Atlanta and Georgia, Atlanta is a part of Georgia, Georgia is a much broad area everything that happen in Georgia didn't all happen in Atlanta.

No, around the same time as the British Jamestown in 1607, the Spanish was the first and had colonial missions on the coast of Georgia, then the Spanish was the first inland also they came exploring during the Mississippian culture era. Georgia was consider Spanish Florida to the Spanish. The Mocama and Guale Provinces were under the Spanish mission system. Later with the British's Carolina province in place cause conflicts between the British and the Spanish.

One of the reason why Georgia came about is to set up a buffer state for the Carolina province, The Spanish lose influence in the region during the Yamasee War. By 1704 the British pretty much control the area. In 1742 the Spanish tried invading but failed.

Guale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spanish missions in Georgia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yamasee War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History of Georgia (U.S. state) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2011, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,745 posts, read 5,571,939 times
Reputation: 6009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifeshadower View Post
True that. But its also helpful to know that the areas of the Bay Area that people most go to typically do have more Asian people than Hispanics, while the opposite is true for the LA area (not all of the time of course, but is true for a huge chunk of the time)

What's weird is that out of those 6, SF Bay has the 2nd most diverse Latino population in terms of percentage (not by a LOT, it's still there), and out of the top 10 areas with the most Hispanics, the Bay Area has the 3rd most diverse Latin population (though the drop between 2 and 3 is HUGE!)

Top 10 2010 CSA/MSA Hispanic population (largest group share of Latino population)

1. Los Angeles: 8,028,831 (80.6% Mexican)
2. New York: 4,790,542 (28.7% Puerto Rican)
3. Miami: 2,312,929 (42.5% Cuban)
4. Houston: 2,124,875 (75.4% Mexcan)
5. Chicago: 1,973,340 (79.3% Mexican)
6. Bay Area: 1,797,078 (74.4% Mexican)
7. DFW: 1,795,412 (83.3% Mexican)
8. Phoenix: 1,235,718 (86.4% Mexican)
9. San Antonio: 1,158,148 (83.9% Mexican)
10. San Diego: 991,348 (87.7% Mexican)
New York and Miami are in a class by themselves in terms of Hispanic diversity. The rest are overwhemlingly Mexican. I can't believe how many Mexicans live in Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Northridge, Los Angeles, CA
2,684 posts, read 7,383,617 times
Reputation: 2411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago South Sider View Post
New York and Miami are in a class by themselves in terms of Hispanic diversity. The rest are overwhemlingly Mexican. I can't believe how many Mexicans live in Los Angeles.
Well, DC is up there as well, but just shy of 1 million Hispanics (at 912k, with 27.4% being Salvadorian as the largest group), and Boston (with 33% being Puerto Rican as the largest group, but having only 617k Hispanics)

And remember, of course Mexicans are overrepresented nearly everywhere else....it's the country of 110 million people with a 2000 mile land border to the south of us (they are 2/3 of the Latino population in the US as well). But I think people too often fall into the trap thinking that Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, etc. are some huge homogeneous group simply because their country's borders are drawn the way they are. But such is the way the real world works....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 03:04 AM
 
Location: classified
1,678 posts, read 3,738,703 times
Reputation: 1561
^^ In Orlando, Puerto Ricans are the largest hispanic group as well.

Puerto Rican Population Surges in Central Florida
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 03:32 AM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,943,753 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by diablo234 View Post
^^ In Orlando, Puerto Ricans are the largest hispanic group as well.

Puerto Rican Population Surges in Central Florida
Yeah, they make up something like 20%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2011, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,949,941 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiatldal View Post
That why i'm posting out the difference between Atlanta and Georgia, Atlanta is a part of Georgia, Georgia is a much broad area everything that happen in Georgia didn't all happen in Atlanta.

No, around the same time as the British Jamestown in 1607, the Spanish was the first and had colonial missions on the coast of Georgia, then the Spanish was the first inland also they came exploring during the Mississippian culture era. Georgia was consider Spanish Florida to the Spanish. The Mocama and Guale Provinces were under the Spanish mission system. Later with the British's Carolina province in place cause conflicts between the British and the Spanish.

One of the reason why Georgia came about is to set up a buffer state for the Carolina province, The Spanish lose influence in the region during the Yamasee War. By 1704 the British pretty much control the area. In 1742 the Spanish tried invading but failed.

Guale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spanish missions in Georgia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yamasee War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History of Georgia (U.S. state) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
yeah people look at things too rigidly. like as if what is set up now has been that way forever.

Fact of the matter is, SA was a southern town, and Georgia had Spanish influences and was a part of 6 different nations just like Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2011, 10:42 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,943,753 times
Reputation: 4565
SA was a Spanish mission and a Frontier town for most of it's history, ATL was already a Southern town for a good number of years when SA was having it's little identity crisis. Everything CHIATLDAL posted was more about Southeast GA instead of ATL. And even then, by 1836(The year the Tex Revolution ended), Southeast GA had already been established, as did the rest of the state of GA.

History of Savannah, Georgia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In November 1864, two months after capturing the city of Atlanta, General William Tecumseh Sherman and his army of 62,000 men began the march south to Savannah. They lived off the land and, by Sherman's own estimate, caused more than $100 million in property damage in Georgia alone.[9] Sherman called this harsh tactic of material war "hard war" (in modern times this is known as total war).[10]
Sherman and his troops captured Savannah on December 22, 1864. Sherman then telegraphed his commander-in-chief, President Abraham Lincoln, offering him the city as a Christmas present.


History of San Antonio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

"During the Civil War San Antonio was not deeply involved in the secessionist cause, due in part to the fact that many of the city's residents, notably those of German or Mexican ancestry, supported the Union. After the war San Antonio prospered as a center of the cattle culture. There is an argument to be made that it was in San Antonio that the American cowboy originated, because it was there that Spanish and Mexican techniques of herding cattle on horseback were transferred to Anglo-American cattle ranchers. It is undoubted that major cattle trails, including the Chisholm Trail, began in San Antonio. It was for this reason that promoter "Bet a Million" Gates chose San Antonio to demonstrate the value of barbed wire. In 1876 he fenced off Alamo Plaza with the new invention then had cowboys drive a herd of cattle into the wire. When the wire held the cattle many of the ranchers in attendance placed orders for the new product. San Antonio was thus crucial both to the beginning and ending of the open range period in American ranching culture."


Atlanta in the American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,949,941 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
SA was a Spanish mission and a Frontier town for most of it's history, ATL was already a Southern town for a good number of years when SA was having it's little identity crisis. Everything CHIATLDAL posted was more about Southeast GA instead of ATL. And even then, by 1836(The year the Tex Revolution ended), Southeast GA had already been established, as did the rest of the state of GA.

History of Savannah, Georgia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In November 1864, two months after capturing the city of Atlanta, General William Tecumseh Sherman and his army of 62,000 men began the march south to Savannah. They lived off the land and, by Sherman's own estimate, caused more than $100 million in property damage in Georgia alone.[9] Sherman called this harsh tactic of material war "hard war" (in modern times this is known as total war).[10]
Sherman and his troops captured Savannah on December 22, 1864. Sherman then telegraphed his commander-in-chief, President Abraham Lincoln, offering him the city as a Christmas present.


History of San Antonio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

"During the Civil War San Antonio was not deeply involved in the secessionist cause, due in part to the fact that many of the city's residents, notably those of German or Mexican ancestry, supported the Union. After the war San Antonio prospered as a center of the cattle culture. There is an argument to be made that it was in San Antonio that the American cowboy originated, because it was there that Spanish and Mexican techniques of herding cattle on horseback were transferred to Anglo-American cattle ranchers. It is undoubted that major cattle trails, including the Chisholm Trail, began in San Antonio. It was for this reason that promoter "Bet a Million" Gates chose San Antonio to demonstrate the value of barbed wire. In 1876 he fenced off Alamo Plaza with the new invention then had cowboys drive a herd of cattle into the wire. When the wire held the cattle many of the ranchers in attendance placed orders for the new product. San Antonio was thus crucial both to the beginning and ending of the open range period in American ranching culture."


Atlanta in the American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
what does that have to do with the point that SA was not always majority hispanic as it is now??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,198,592 times
Reputation: 2637
What does SA have to do with this topic at all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,949,941 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alacran View Post
What does SA have to do with this topic at all?
It went too far. I am sorry for contributing in that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top