Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What is the hub for Asian culture in the US: Tri-State Area, SoCal or the Bay Area?
Tri-State Area 31 22.63%
SoCal 42 30.66%
Bay Area 64 46.72%
Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
Top 10 states (Asian and in combination):
1. California: 4,915,225
2. New York: 1,415,502
3. Texas: 891,844
4. Hawaii: 708,074
5. New Jersey: 685,068
6. Illinois: 596,109
7. Washington: 505,255
8. Florida: 478,233
9. Virginia: 414,944
10. Massachusetts: 336,803
Top 10 total: 10,947,057

Top CSA's/MSA's (where CSA's aren't available) where Asian Americans live (Detailed Tables - American FactFinder)

Los Angeles CSA: 2,204,836
New York CSA: 1,964,485
Bay Area CSA: 1,672,456 (2nd highest percentage Asian)
Washington DC CSA: 611,444
Chicago, IL CSA: 539,801
Honolulu, HI MSA: 539,141 (highest percentage Asian)
Seattle, WA CSA: 434,828
Boston, MA CSA: 372,300
San Diego, CA MSA: 347,193
Houston, TX CSA: 341,328
Neither in total number nor in percentage does the NY Tri State Area have the largest concentration of Asians in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkAsian View Post
None of the California cities can compare to New York.
This thread is about the 'TRI STATE AREA', and the 'Tri State Area' can't compare to the Bay Area when it comes to Asians being concentrated around the entire region.

To scale maps from the New York Times, 2010 Census
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:30 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,112,972 times
Reputation: 4794
Wow, NorCal kicks the tri state down a notch......great maps Montclair.

Yes, California does have more Asians then the entire east coast!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:35 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,112,972 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkAsian View Post
Yeah, the Bay Area needs Sacramento in order to be put into the same conversation as the Tri-State Area...LOL!

While we have Asians like Jeremy Lin who left California to play for the Knicks, one of many examples of Asians leaving California to the supposedly inferior Tri-State Area.

You are correct the Bay Area has a much higher percentage of Asians than tri state (I'd call that a region too!) In fact second in percentage to only Honolulu.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkAsian View Post
What does 'regionality' have to do with anything?
This thread is about regions, not cities.

And as a region, the Tri State Area is a distant runner up to the Bay Area when it comes to the diaspora of Asians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 04:05 PM
 
Location: London, U.K.
886 posts, read 1,563,143 times
Reputation: 828
NY > LA as far as Asians are concerned, now SF is a different story
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 04:14 PM
 
672 posts, read 1,788,464 times
Reputation: 499
The key and most glaring difference between the Socal/ Bay Area Asians (strong influence) and the tri-state Asians (weak influence) is that here in the Bay Area, California, and the West Coast in general, we have Asians that run sh*t!

The mayor of SF is Chinese. The mayor of Oakland is Chinese. The first Asian American mayor of any major US city (San Jose) was Asian.

There are three Asian Americans representing California in Congress. None for tri-state.

IN fact, Hawaii has a far higher claim than tri-state in this respect. Daniel Inouye, the president pro-tempore in the US Senate, is Third in line of succession to the US Presidency. Tri-state has no clue (or better yet no chance) on how to get an Asian elected to higher office. Why is that? Surely an Asian will rise and overtake Bloomberg, right?!? WRONG! not in 100 years IMO.

In comparison the Asian population in the tri-state area is disenfranchised, punch less, listless, clout less, and small time compared to Asians out West. It's pure unadulterated inferiority complex at its finest that we are witnessing here on this site. And it's actually pleasing me to no end to see them wail away like they have been when it comes to this topic! LOLOLOL

***And don't think we haven't caught on to the fact that every other name that has voted for tri-state is "NOT A MEMBER". It's transparent! LMFAO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 04:31 PM
rah
 
Location: Oakland
3,314 posts, read 9,234,338 times
Reputation: 2538
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAXTOR121 View Post
NY > LA as far as Asians are concerned, now SF is a different story
The LA area has more Asians than the NYC area, both in raw numbers and as a percentage. How many times does this need to be repeated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 04:38 PM
 
Location: New York, N.Y.
379 posts, read 467,984 times
Reputation: 554
It really is a numbers game, and LA and SF surpass NYC in terms of East Asian representation, while NYC overshadows LA and SF in terms of South Asian representation. Simple, really. Someone should lock this thread as this argument has gone on longer than necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2012, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,410,810 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkAsian View Post
New York CSA: 1,964,485
Bay Area CSA: 1,672,456 (2nd highest percentage Asian)

Your numbers state that the inferior New York Area has 300,000 more Asians than the Bay Area. So logically, we're 2nd based on that. However, I would say we're 1st because Asians are a much larger growing part of the population than in SoCal, which by now is pretty much Mexico
A) New York metro is 3x larger than The Bay, so a 300k lead is hardly impressive. Percentage wise, San Francisco and environs blow NY CSA clean out of the water.

B) Your statement about L.A. defies all common sense. What part of "LA has more total Asians, AND a higher percentage of L.A.'s population is Asian" do you not understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top