Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What would your city size be?
Huge physical size huge population 58 57.43%
Huge physical size but not so big population 15 14.85%
Small physical size but large population 16 15.84%
Other 12 11.88%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752

Advertisements

If your city would form a city/county government, what would the physical size of your city be and what would be its population?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:41 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
1,472 posts, read 3,545,629 times
Reputation: 1583
Oh that's easy - 815,358 for both. San Francisco City and County cover the same 46.7 square miles of land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffredo View Post
Oh that's easy - 815,358 for both. San Francisco City and County cover the same 46.7 square miles of land.

is it consolidated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:47 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,034,220 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
is it consolidated?
Yeah San Francisco is consolidated.

- Houston would have 4.1 Million people in 1,729 Square Miles.
- Chicago would have 5.3 Million people in 946 Square Miles.
- Austin would have 1.05 Million people in 989 Square Miles.
- Washington DC, well its the lucky city that isn't in any counties for it to ever even consider consolidation with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:48 PM
 
Location: St Paul, MN - NJ's Gold Coast
5,251 posts, read 13,810,104 times
Reputation: 3178
Bergen County is weird, the southern half around Essex/Hudson counties is pretty urban (where I live)- But once you get up by Rockland county things get very affluent and spaced out. It has about 900K people, and the land mass is about 100sqmi less than Dallas. (BC is about 240 square miles)
I'd say it's about average.

Hudson county SHOULD be a city. It'ss only 47square miles and has a larger population than ATL, Baltimore, Buffalo, DC, and more (and they all have a larger land mass than Hudson County)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:50 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,148,184 times
Reputation: 14762
Miami would huge in land and population. But, it would be a deceiving statistic because most of the county land is undevelopable Everglades and other wetlands. The new Miami on its sliver of developed land would be about 2.5 million people. I have no idea how much of Dade County is actually developable but the total is probably under 400 square miles. The total land area in Miami-Dade is 1946 square miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 08:52 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,148,184 times
Reputation: 14762
Raleigh would be about 925,000 in 857 square miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752
If city/county consolidations went national,

7 of the ten most populated cities would be in the sunbelt.

three from California, two from Texas one from Arizona and one from florida.

The frost belt would have 3. Two in New York Metro and Chicago/Cook.

The north eastern counties are very small so from the top 25 most populated cities, only Brooklyn, Kew Gardens (county seat of Queens), Manhatten, Cambridge, Riverhead and Philly would make it on the list.

The Mid West would have Chicago and Detroit.

The west would have 11.
One in Arizona, one in Washington State, one in Nevada and 8 in California.

The south would have six. Two in Florida and four in Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Detroit's Marina District
970 posts, read 2,967,480 times
Reputation: 400
If Detroit were to consolidate with Wayne County...

1,925,848 people in an area of 614 sq mi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2011, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,931,774 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Remisc View Post
If Detroit were to consolidate with Wayne County...

1,925,848 people in an area of 614 sq mi.

I would have thought Detroit would be bigger because the metro pop is still large
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top