Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2012, 03:57 PM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,389,552 times
Reputation: 788

Advertisements

I am on a 4 hour flight and had some time on my hands.....

I looked up the ridership for Heavy Rail, Light Rail, Buses, Commuter Rail. The numbers are pretty interesting:

All numbers are for daily ridership:

New York City:

Subway: 8,360,000
Subway (PATH): 259,1000
Bus: 2,623,100
Commuter (LIRR): 352,000
Commuter (Metro North): 298,500
Total Daily Ridership: 11,892,100


Chicago:

Subway (EL): 713,500
Bus: 998,600
Commuter: 316,800
Total Daily Ridership: 2,028,900


Los Angeles:

Subway: 142,600
Light Rail: 152,400
Bus: 1,125,200
Commuter: 39,600
Total Daily Ridership: 1,459,800


Washington DC:

Subway (Metro): 961,500
Bus: 440,000
Commuter Rail (MARC): 33,700
Commuter Rail (VRE): 19,200
Total Daily Ridership: 1,454,400


Boston:
Subway: 525,600
Light Rail: 233,300
Bus: 397,900
Commuter Rail: 130,600
Total Daily Ridership: 1,287,400


Philadelphia:
Subway: 342,800
Light Rail: 110,600
Bus: 597,300
Commuter Rail: 127,200
Total Daily Ridership: 1,177,900


San Fran:
Subway: 379,300
Light Rail: 162,500
Bus: 492,700
Commuter Rail: 41,400
Total Daily Ridership: 1,075,900


Interesting to see, outside of NYC which is on another level completely, most pretty close together, with Chicago having a about 500,000 more than LA and DC.

I left out suburban bus systems as there were too many to list and none of them had huge numbers.

Also, I didn't know what to do with New Jersey Transit as it is split between Philly and NYC. My guess would be a 2:1 ratio to NYC but that is nothing but a guess.

*Ridership numbers are from Wikipedia, and I am not sure if they are the most up to date.

Last edited by prelude91; 03-14-2012 at 04:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2012, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,845,315 times
Reputation: 4049
No big surprises here IMO. The best news is that all these numbers should be increasing - and in some cities drastically.

LA has a long way to go to catch up in rail ridership. Bus ridership is very impressive and no surprise to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 04:03 PM
 
2,247 posts, read 7,026,911 times
Reputation: 2159
I didn't know that Washington had the second busiest subway system. Interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 04:04 PM
 
1,750 posts, read 3,389,552 times
Reputation: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
No big surprises here IMO. The best news is that all these numbers should be increasing - and in some cities drastically.

LA has a long way to go to catch up in rail ridership. Bus ridership is very impressive and no surprise to me.
I've never ridden a bus in LA, but I hear the network is pretty extensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Glendale, CA
1,299 posts, read 2,538,523 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
No big surprises here IMO. The best news is that all these numbers should be increasing - and in some cities drastically.

LA has a long way to go to catch up in rail ridership. Bus ridership is very impressive and no surprise to me.
Come on Expo Line...

(and Purple Line)
(and Expo part 2)
(and Crenshaw)
(and Gold Line extension)
(and downtown connector)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 04:51 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,337,475 times
Reputation: 21212
Numbers should be about triple what they are for all of these save for NYC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 05:54 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,974,451 times
Reputation: 4323
For buses you'd really have to add in all of the different munis if you want the total. I'd also add NJT commuter rail for NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 06:02 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,498,822 times
Reputation: 5879
NYC is insane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,736,928 times
Reputation: 4081
It's a much more interesting comparison when you factor in population.


New York City:

Subway: 8,360,000
Subway (PATH): 259,1000
Bus: 2,623,100
Commuter (LIRR): 352,000
Commuter (Metro North): 298,500
Total Daily Ridership: 11,892,100
Population: 18,897,109 people



Chicago:

Subway (EL): 713,500
Bus: 998,600
Commuter: 316,800
Total Daily Ridership: 2,028,900
Population: 9,461,105 people



Los Angeles:

Subway: 142,600
Light Rail: 152,400
Bus: 1,125,200
Commuter: 39,600
Total Daily Ridership: 1,459,800
Population: 12,828,837 people



Washington DC:

Subway (Metro): 961,500
Bus: 440,000
Commuter Rail (MARC): 33,700
Commuter Rail (VRE): 19,200
Total Daily Ridership: 1,454,400
Population: 5,582,170 people



Boston:

Subway: 525,600
Light Rail: 233,300
Bus: 397,900
Commuter Rail: 130,600
Total Daily Ridership: 1,287,400
Population: 4,552,402 people



Philadelphia:


Subway: 342,800
Light Rail: 110,600
Bus: 597,300
Commuter Rail: 127,200
Total Daily Ridership: 1,177,900
Population: 5,965,343 people



San Fran:

Subway: 379,300
Light Rail: 162,500
Bus: 492,700
Commuter Rail: 41,400
Total Daily Ridership: 1,075,900
Population: 4,335,391 people
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,974,451 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
It's a much more interesting comparison when you factor in population.
Maybe. But for LA you should at least add the larger munis if you're going to start adding additional counties. Like add OCTA, since Orange County is in that population figure. Plus Long Beach and Santa Monica. I'm sure that other cities like SF and Chicago have similar munis. Not sure about DC.

Los Angeles:

Subway: 142,600
Light Rail: 152,400
Bus: 1,125,200
OCTA: 165,000
LBT: 85,000
BBB: 85,000
Commuter: 39,600
Total Daily Ridership: 1,794,800
Population: 12,828,837 people
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top