U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-27-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: New York
258 posts, read 287,448 times
Reputation: 256

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
I think we are talking past each other.

Maybe Monty is right about California and the cities.

I am not talking about suburban cities like Irvine, as myself and others have said we organize our communities differently here. But I am talking about cities which are outside of the orbit of NYC, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Diego, Pittsburgh and Buffalo. Some of our more distant cities, Rochester, Syracuse and Scranton for instance, have problems and have seen better days. What I do not know is what CA cities such as Sacramento, Stockton and Bakersfield are like to compare. Do they also have problems?

I do agree with Monty about the 3 NE states and the small town and villages.
Syracuse is not "distant." It is in the dead center of the state. Not sure what you meant by that?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2012, 11:55 PM
 
Location: Weehawken
131 posts, read 167,275 times
Reputation: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yawn

And so the answer is, California has more cities with 100,000+ people that are desirable, have great schools, low crime and excellent quality of life than NJ/NY/PA.

Period. End of Story.
Irvine- 46sqmi 209K pop (A giganti suburb just east of LA)

The NJ gold Coast- 36sq 650K pop (Highly desirable urban/suburban real estate just west of NYC)

From Jersey City/Hoboken to Englewood Cliffs/Fort Lee. You can compare that to Oakland if you want.

Don't limit yourself to the 30-50 square miles cities/suburbs of CA to the 1-15 square mile cities/suburbs in the north east (or in this case, NJ). Be fair.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 02:00 AM
 
Location: where u wish u lived
897 posts, read 673,587 times
Reputation: 254
This thread should be closed, California trumps all of the northeast why 17 pages?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Appalachian New York, Formerly Louisiana
2,621 posts, read 3,053,529 times
Reputation: 2466
This thread has gotten really stupid.

I'm done.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 09:38 AM
 
Location: The big blue yonder...
1,943 posts, read 2,399,583 times
Reputation: 935
This question............. ummm.......

Okay, whatever. No chance Pennsylvania will EVER be a "better" state than California first off, whether it annexes Jersey AND NYC or not. Having Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, NYC, Buffalo, and all of Jersey together in one large, dreary, Northeastern state is still not going to match the Golden State. 2nd, It would probably go the other way around, as in Pennsylvania and Jersey would be absorbed by the big daddy, New York IF there were any ridiculous chance of the 3 forming 1 big state, and THAT state STILL wouldn't match California...
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Fairfield County, CT
13,506 posts, read 17,828,459 times
Reputation: 4157
165 posts in the dumbest thread I've seen in a long time.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2012, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Scranton, PA
48 posts, read 43,124 times
Reputation: 55
Seeing that this is just about an opinion, and me being a Pennsylvanian, I would say yes. Pennsylvania will always be better than any other state. (But that's just because I'm from here)
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 01:18 PM
 
239 posts, read 348,763 times
Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by 415_s2k View Post
For me, no; you could include PA, NJ, and NY into one state but they'd never have California's geography, climate, culture, etc. These things are the main draw for me.
^This. Pennsylvania will gain beaches, NYC, Niagara Falls, Finger Lakes, Jersey Shore, Atlantic City, and Adirondacks but IMO it won't be a "greater state" than California. As 41s2k stated, California has a very unique geography, climate, and culture that draws many people there. No offense, but many areas of Upstate NY are economically depressed, so economic wise I don't think Pennsylvania would gain much from NY other than some nature and NYC.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Zurich, Switzerland/ Piedmont, CA
27,801 posts, read 44,274,575 times
Reputation: 12311
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImOnTheMove View Post
Be fair.
Fair is admitting that while the Northeast has nicer small towns and villages, California has far better cities with 100,000+ population.

I wont hold my breath waiting for agreement. LOL
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2012, 01:50 PM
 
78 posts, read 107,628 times
Reputation: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Fair is admitting that while the Northeast has nicer small towns and villages, California has far better cities with 100,000+ population.

I wont hold my breath waiting for agreement. LOL
Los Angels isn't better than NYC
San Francisco isn't better than Philly
San Diego isn't better than Philly or NYC
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $99,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2016, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top