U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-29-2008, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Manhattan, New York
371 posts, read 1,009,982 times
Reputation: 63

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
i don't like the new glitzy buildings that will be added to the new york city skyline. i've always loved the more industrial look of it.

the chicago skyline has always looked awful to me and that drill bit being added to the skyline is like putting a turd on top of vomit.

i prefer the cities that spread their skylines around. not one huge mess of buildings. it helps to give different areas of the city character.
everybody knows buildings when built dont always look like the pictures

 
Old 07-29-2008, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Houston
6,865 posts, read 12,811,737 times
Reputation: 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarolinaBredChicagoan View Post
Hmmm. Ok. Well, I let it slide when you implied that Houston could even hang with Chicago or NYC, but then you had to directly insult Chicago...

Compared to Chicago (and NYC, by the by...) Houston barely has a skyline. There are 28 buildings in Houston over 500' tall. In Chicago? 92, with 14 more under construction and two more approved for construction.

As for quality, Houston has little more to offer than generic glass and steel (coincidentally, the same thing you criticize in the proposed NYC development above...).

Now, I see no reason to dump on Houston any further. It's got a decent skyline for a sunbelt city. However, I wonder if you've even ever been to Chicago.
never been to chicago and i have no desire to go. i'm only stating my personal preference. i like skylines that dot the horizon. not one big mass of buildings. Houston has about 5 or so distinct skylines in and around the city. i like the way it urbanizes outlying areas of the city.
 
Old 07-29-2008, 07:21 PM
 
Location: North Central Indiana
980 posts, read 2,909,172 times
Reputation: 285
I couldn't live without Chicago's skyline!!
 
Old 07-30-2008, 02:25 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,436 posts, read 5,984,645 times
Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScranBarre View Post
I think Scranton has the best skyline!



What's not to love about a nitty-gritty blue-collar downtown scene? Talk about sexy!
Scranton..Sexy WTF?!
Santa Fe has a way better skyline than that, they have an equal population,
well id say Santa Fe has more now..since its gaining NOT LOSING.

 
Old 07-30-2008, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Manhattan, New York
371 posts, read 1,009,982 times
Reputation: 63
NYC
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0b/Fullnycskyline.jpg (broken link)

 
Old 08-23-2008, 01:36 PM
 
10 posts, read 48,487 times
Reputation: 13
Default MIAMI explosion

Miami would have one of the best skyline in the future

Miami is called the magic city for a reason

Does anyone know how Miami got to built so fast?
well its simple drug money
do a little research on Miami (80s and 90s were not so great for miami)
so I am not surprise Miami built there selves really fast
and also I would like you guys to do some research on who owns half of those building?
well that will be former mobster from columbia
drug money speaks
unlike other cities
that built there way to the top
and by the way do not try to argue with me on this one
I think I know what I am talking about
so to all the other cities in the U.S do what Miami did
let the thug money built your city to the top
Philly you are almost here (Miami at one point hold a lot of crime)
the differences from Miami and Philly is: Miami invest with drug money and Philly just kill for stupid reason
 
Old 08-23-2008, 01:44 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,382 posts, read 15,324,812 times
Reputation: 1589
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradly View Post
Scranton..Sexy WTF?!
Santa Fe has a way better skyline than that, they have an equal population,
well id say Santa Fe has more now..since its gaining NOT LOSING.

Id have to say Scanton has a much better skyline than Santa fe IMO haha


Scranton on Flickr - Photo Sharing!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/eb/DowntownScranton2003.jpg/800px-DowntownScranton2003.jpg (broken link)
Google Image Result for http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/eb/DowntownScranton2003.jpg
 
Old 09-07-2008, 12:51 PM
 
42 posts, read 193,024 times
Reputation: 58
I agree about the SKYLINES in Houston. Once they start filling in, watch out! We got cranes everywhere. No supertalls but 40-60 story towers in the works. This pics are old (2-3 years old).









 
Old 09-07-2008, 12:52 PM
 
42 posts, read 193,024 times
Reputation: 58
Remember, the tallest building is over 1000ft.
 
Old 09-07-2008, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Chi town
50 posts, read 128,670 times
Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Valley View Post
I'm sorry, but IMO, the Chicago Spire is one of the most ugly buildings I have ever seen. I know Chicago raves abouts its world class, and different skyscrapers and yada, yada, yada. But come on. That thing looks so out of place next to the big black Hancock, and Sears(which I also think are ugly). The WTC complex looks far better and more comprehensive, and when completed will ensure that NYC stays #1 in the US for decades to come. Again, IMO.
How can you justify saying that adding the WTC complex to NYC is at all different from the Spire in Chicago. The WTC complex looks just as out of place in new york as the spire in chicago.

And the diversification of skyscrapers in chicago is better than anywhere else. New York from afar just looks like somebody took a bunch of rectangular prisms, made them different colors and bunched them up way to close together.

Also, Chicago wins a lot of contests for the best skyline, not because it has the most skyscrapers like NYC, but because it has a very expansive and gigantic skyline.

I think that the WTC will add to NYC, as well as the Spire adding to Chicago, and I don't know what the future will hold, but Chicago and New York will always be the 2 best, but in different ways.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top