U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Which city's residential architecture do you prefer?
Minneapolis 11 9.24%
Kansas City 3 2.52%
Chicago 58 48.74%
Milwaukee 7 5.88%
St. Louis 42 35.29%
Indianapolis 6 5.04%
Detroit 14 11.76%
Cincinnati 21 17.65%
Columbus 4 3.36%
Cleveland 12 10.08%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Unread 07-01-2012, 07:10 PM
 
6,906 posts, read 3,943,046 times
Reputation: 3628
Default Which of these midwest cities has the best RESIDENTIAL architecture?

I want to have more discussion on here about midwest cities. Of the 10 cities in this poll, choose the ones that you think have the best residential architecture in terms of style, variety and esthetic appeal. Include the metropolitan areas as well.

Please share images if you have any. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 07-02-2012, 03:19 AM
 
Location: Suburbia and boy is it great (NOT)
822 posts, read 745,860 times
Reputation: 546
Baltimore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 03:47 AM
 
Location: Queens, New York City
2,251 posts, read 3,090,938 times
Reputation: 1884
Personally speaking, I prefer brick attached housing. It's much more urban and aesthetically appealing to me than detached wood-frame housing, which simply does not not age or hold up nearly as well as masonry does, and has a bit of a small-townish vibe to me for some reason.

Old walk-ups have a mysterious coolness to them, while an abandoned frame cottage just looks depressing.

Strictly speaking of the pre-war neighborhoods, here is how I'd rank the cities, from best to worst residential architecture:

Cincinnati: The Victorian styles are amazing.
St. Louis: Some great German influenced architecture.
Chicago: More variety, practically everything to choose from.
Columbus: Columbus has a good selection of dense, all-brick neighborhoods.
Milwaukee: Nice mix of apartment buildings interspersed with the houses.
Minneapolis/St. Paul: See Milwaukee. Interesting Queen Anne styles.
Kansas City: Occasional brick houses mixed among the frame houses.
Detroit: Surprisingly limited selection for such a large city.
Cleveland: Very heavily wood-frame, reminds me of Buffalo.
Indianapolis: Somewhat non-descript housing stock, although very nice on the Northside.

Last edited by Colts; 07-02-2012 at 03:58 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 06:32 AM
 
Location: Paris
452 posts, read 168,473 times
Reputation: 240
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCOriolesfan View Post
Baltimore
As an Orioles fan, you do know that Baltimore isn't in the Midwest right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 06:58 AM
Status: "BONGsomnia" (set 27 days ago)
 
Location: Cardboard box
1,885 posts, read 1,287,537 times
Reputation: 1198
Chicago, obviously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 07:10 AM
 
Location: 46201
5,605 posts, read 5,264,558 times
Reputation: 2971
I would put Over The Rhine in Cincinnati against any other midwestern neighborhood as far as architecture is concerned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 08:31 AM
 
973 posts, read 638,385 times
Reputation: 551
in terms of historic architecture, st. louis easily runs away with this when taking the entire city into account.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Chicago (from pittsburgh)
2,210 posts, read 1,238,856 times
Reputation: 1300
Easily Chicago...from Frank Lloyd Wright homes to Rowhouses to 3 flats to the best highrise living anywhere in the US outside of NYC and more. The other cities don't offer the variety, quantity or quality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis
1,027 posts, read 583,823 times
Reputation: 1391
The Chicago homers are going to say Chicago but I think St Louis is the real answer. The architecture in the city is amazing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 07-02-2012, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Queens, New York City
2,251 posts, read 3,090,938 times
Reputation: 1884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewcifer View Post
The Chicago homers are going to say Chicago but I think St Louis is the real answer. The architecture in the city is amazing.
Yes. When adjusted for size, both Cincinnati and St. Louis are superior to Chicago, IMO in terms of residential architecture pound for pound.

It just pains me to see so many blocks of burned out, abandoned buildings in those cities--other cities would kill for that type of housing stock.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top