Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not counting spires, if the three tallest buildings in Houston were in Manhattan, they would be the 2nd, 3rd, and 6th tallest buildings...at least until 175 Greenwich and the Freedom Tower are built. Houston's JP Morgan Chase Tower (305m), Wells Fargo Tower (302.4m), and Williams Tower (274.6m) would tower over everything else except the Empire State (381m). The Chrysler Building (282m) would be 3rd, and Citigroup (278m) would be 5th.
don't forget 200 Greenwich, Tower Verre (MOMA expansion) and the Girisole(which will be the exact height as chase) . well they're only proposed! Guess you only adding u/c towers
NYC is poised for another supertall construction boom. The economy just needs to kick it up a notch. Houston has so much land area that make it unnecessarily expensive to go up too high with new projects. There are however two 45 story, one 55 story, and a 54 story project either under construction or have been approved. That's not quite the height of the tall NYC projects either under construction, or proposed but exciting none-the-less.
The makeup of a skyline is much more important to me than the actual visual components.Whats going on behind those buildings? When I see Hong Kong,Tokyo or NYC's skyline I see an incredibly vibrant civilization. Sorry but when I see Miami,Atlanta and some of the sunbelt skylines I see artificial, self important,unnecessary, unsightly height sprinkled around 12 lane highways.
I'd like to see Houston concentrate on building a core and forget about the 70 story high rises that act as humongous middle fingers to the rest of your city.
I love the philadephia skyline - especially from the spring garden street bridge by the art museum - philly has a nice mix of heights, old and new and different designs - i dig it
although much smaller I absolutely love the mpls skyline
with the way it nestles into the mountains SLC has a lot of potential, but is far from there
i love SF as a city, but their skyline doesn't excite me - to me the buildings are probably some of the least interesting things about the city
I really like seattle's though - to me it would be a coinflip between there and philly - seattle throws some different stuff in with the space needle, key arena the more modern downtown and then the older areas near pioneer square
The makeup of a skyline is much more important to me than the actual visual components.Whats going on behind those buildings? When I see Hong Kong,Tokyo or NYC's skyline I see an incredibly vibrant civilization. Sorry but when I see Miami,Atlanta and some of the sunbelt skylines I see artificial, self important,unnecessary, unsightly height sprinkled around 12 lane highways.
I'd like to see Houston concentrate on building a core and forget about the 70 story high rises that act as humongous middle fingers to the rest of your city.
excuse me!?!? Is that your opinion of the sunbelt?? because its wrong.
Beautiful pics. Thanks for sharing! Here is a pic of the Legal District in the Northeast corner of Downtown Houston. The pic is from the 19th floor of the criminal courts building facing south towards the older criminal courts building (undergoing renovation).
Last edited by jmonroy1973; 06-15-2008 at 02:14 PM..
Reason: add pic
Seattle is a choice I"ll never understand as far as skylines go.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.