U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Will Houston surpass Chicago as the 3rd largest city by 2020?
Yes 225 42.86%
No 300 57.14%
Voters: 525. You may not vote on this poll

Reply


 
Old 10-13-2007, 01:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
798 posts, read 533,519 times
Reputation: 154
downtown1 has a spectacular aura aboutdowntown1 has a spectacular aura aboutdowntown1 has a spectacular aura aboutdowntown1 has a spectacular aura about
Houston and Dallas nowadays have many transplants from Chicago, SF, LA, NY because those people want to take advantage of the strong job growth and affordable housing. Texas cities like Houston, Dallas, Austin & San Antonio are a big draw for newcomers these days.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lategreattex View Post
The reason Houston has passed Chicago as the sweatiest and fattest, (they left out butt-ugly), is because it's become overpopuated with people FROM Chicago and other parts of the midwest, just like Dallas has and unfortunately the rest of Texas if somebody doesn't put up a big ol fence on the Northern border instead of the Mexican border. No longer are you comparing Texans to Midwesterners...because they are all moving here. That is why Texas is now the most unfriendly state, the least romantic state, one of the fattest states, worst traffic, one of the top polluted states, highest crime states....you name it anything bad that Texas can be listed for is due to TRANSPLANTS!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2007, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago
2,957 posts, read 1,689,693 times
Reputation: 729
jdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to beholdjdiddy is a splendid one to behold
It's kind of pointless to compare the populations of the two cities proper, as most of Chicago's collar suburbs have higher densities than much of Houston proper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 03:56 PM
Thankful to God
Status: "Happy, happy, happy" (set 8 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX
2,199 posts, read 1,551,703 times
Reputation: 499
texas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of lighttexas7 is a glorious beacon of light
Actually you know those fattest city rating actually have nothing to do with the actual people don't you? They are based on restaurants per square mile, number of fitness centers, parks (and the weather conditions that allow people to enjoy the outdoors), etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 04:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Region, Indiana/ Chicago, Illinois
751 posts, read 604,435 times
Reputation: 292
Nafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealAngelion View Post
Back to the original question. Absolutely! Houston will eventually replace Chicago as the third largest city in the U.S.

Houston population according to 2000 Census 1,953,631
Houston population according to 2006 Census estimate 2,074,828

Gain of 121,197 residents

Chicago population according to 2000 Census 2,896,016
Chicago population according to 2006 Census estimate 2,749,283

Loss of 146,733 residents

The greater Washington, D.C. area will also eventually replace Chicago as the third largest metro economy in the U.S.

Source please on Washington D.C. I have never heard that claim before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 04:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,717,956 times
Reputation: 316
mpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by dancocal View Post
They have already passed Chicago as the Sweatiest and fattiest.
( no offense, really there are studies on these things )
That's saying something because Chicagoans love to eat.

Fat sweaty folk aside there is more room to grow in Houston.
Actually, genius, as of 2007, neither Chicago or Houston are considered "fat cities." The famous title of the Fattest City in America was given to both cities by Men's Fitness magazine, who didn't even use relevant criteria to say where the most overweight people were located. Houston actually has a relatively low average BMI. I believe it's 25. Lower than the national average of 27. And last time I checked, Chicago's was 27. So is New York's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 04:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,717,956 times
Reputation: 316
mpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapcat View Post
Houston developers have it easy.
This is not always a good thing. Houston's rapid growth combined with more than enough room to grow combined with the no-zoning regulations has caused developers to build less than impressive, often times cheap buildings within a quick amount of time. That has got to change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 04:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,717,956 times
Reputation: 316
mpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nafster View Post
According to Wikipedia, which got it's source from the census bureau,

Chicago: 9.6 Million

Houston: 5.6 Million

Not exactly twice, but almost.
Yet, not twice...as I said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 04:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,717,956 times
Reputation: 316
mpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by st. louie louie View Post
I have to assume your talking about the city proper. Houston would not be able to surpass Chicago without annexing more land.
Unless it create more density by tearing down existing homes and building new ones closer together.
As long as they leave the old southern homes alone, that's fine by me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 05:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,717,956 times
Reputation: 316
mpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdiddy View Post
It's kind of pointless to compare the populations of the two cities proper, as most of Chicago's collar suburbs have higher densities than much of Houston proper.
Which ones, for example? None of the ones I found had a density higher than Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 08:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LaSalle Park / St. Louis
521 posts, read 424,510 times
Reputation: 158
st. louie louie has a spectacular aura aboutst. louie louie has a spectacular aura aboutst. louie louie has a spectacular aura aboutst. louie louie has a spectacular aura about
Look at Cicero, Brookfield, Berwyn to name a few.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top