U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
View Poll Results: Will Houston surpass Chicago as the 3rd largest city by 2020?
Yes 225 42.86%
No 300 57.14%
Voters: 525. You may not vote on this poll

Reply


 
Old 10-12-2007, 05:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
79 posts, read 137,295 times
Reputation: 43
Skyline887 is on a distinguished road
Default Will houston surpass chicago as the third largest city

Do you people think Houston will surpass chicago has the third largest by 2010 or 2020?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2007, 06:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
2,659 posts, read 1,758,484 times
Reputation: 1166
ogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud ofogre has much to be proud of
I'm not sure what their populations are at present, but another factor to consider is metro area population. This has more effect on how big an entire urban area feels than just the population of the principal city. If you take that into account, the DFW areas is the biggest metro in Texas. In the sense of the entire urban agglomeration, Houston would still have to jump ahead to become the largest in its own state before it would overtake Chicago.

If you do look at only the cities proper, not entire metro areas, if Houston's population is now close to Chicago's, of course it's inevitable that Houston will become larger than Chicago before long. The big Sun Belt cities are growing. Most are growing at fast rates, while the old cities in the Northeast and Midwest are either losing population, remaining stable, or gaining population very slowly. You do the math. If these trends continue, some Sun Belt area will eventually overtake Chicago as the thrid largest metro. That will take longer than it will for the city of Houston proper (most likely Houston, since it's currently fourth in population) to move ahead of Chicago proper, but, if current population trends continue, it's inevitable that it will happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 08:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Region, Indiana/ Chicago, Illinois
751 posts, read 596,300 times
Reputation: 292
Nafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the rough
Actually I read an article, I wish I could post it, about a year ago that said Sociologists DONT expect Houston to surpass Chicago within the next 50 years.

They say Chicago routinely goes through booms and losses in populations as people come in and out of the city andmove to the suburbs.

The Chicago metro area is twice the size as Houstons, and while not growing as fast, is rapidly expanding.

If Houston does exceed Chicago in population, it will only be city, and not metro wise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 09:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In God
3,076 posts, read 3,682,800 times
Reputation: 316
mpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the roughmpope409 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nafster View Post
Actually I read an article, I wish I could post it, about a year ago that said Sociologists DONT expect Houston to surpass Chicago within the next 50 years.

They say Chicago routinely goes through booms and losses in populations as people come in and out of the city andmove to the suburbs.

The Chicago metro area is twice the size as Houstons, and while not growing as fast, is rapidly expanding.

If Houston does exceed Chicago in population, it will only be city, and not metro wise.
It's actually very possible, but I HOPE IT NEVER HAPPENS. And the Chicagoland metro area is not twice the size of Houston's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 10:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Delaware OH
57 posts, read 91,438 times
Reputation: 21
mapcat is on a distinguished road
Houston still has a LOT of land it could annex. Chicago is landlocked, so any new development will have to involve tearing something else down. Houston developers have it easy. I think it's possible, but not by 2010. 2030, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 10:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver
677 posts, read 680,883 times
Reputation: 253
danco is a jewel in the roughdanco is a jewel in the roughdanco is a jewel in the roughdanco is a jewel in the roughdanco is a jewel in the roughdanco is a jewel in the rough
They have already passed Chicago as the Sweatiest and fattiest.
( no offense, really there are studies on these things )
That's saying something because Chicagoans love to eat.

Fat sweaty folk aside there is more room to grow in Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 10:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
2,143 posts, read 1,367,697 times
Reputation: 902
coldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to beholdcoldwine is a splendid one to behold
I don't think it would surprise me greatly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 10:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Region, Indiana/ Chicago, Illinois
751 posts, read 596,300 times
Reputation: 292
Nafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the roughNafster is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpope409 View Post
It's actually very possible, but I HOPE IT NEVER HAPPENS. And the Chicagoland metro area is not twice the size of Houston's.
According to Wikipedia, which got it's source from the census bureau,

Chicago: 9.6 Million

Houston: 5.6 Million

Not exactly twice, but almost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2007, 11:41 PM
The Godfather
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
1,812 posts, read 2,347,926 times
Reputation: 822
SpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to beholdSpeedyAZ is a splendid one to behold
Houston may pass Chicago eventually but not in only 12 years. Houston is growing faster than Chicago, that's a fact but it's not growing at high enough rate that it will pass Chicago yet. Heck DFW is growing faster than Houston and already has a higher metro population (6.2 mil vs 5.6 mil). Houston should be concerned about catching DFW, not Chicago.
__________________
______________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\ ||__
|.......Budweiser.............. ||""\_____\
|_____________________/||__|___|
|(@)(@)"""""""""""|(@)(@)*****|(@)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 01:14 AM
Real Estate Agent
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greater Houston
2,223 posts, read 1,762,117 times
Reputation: 318
KerrTown is a jewel in the roughKerrTown is a jewel in the roughKerrTown is a jewel in the roughKerrTown is a jewel in the roughKerrTown is a jewel in the roughKerrTown is a jewel in the roughKerrTown is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedyAZ View Post
Houston should be concerned about catching DFW, not Chicago.
That is our number 1 priority. If we lose, I'm moving to Chicagoland and leaving Texas and DFW in the dust. Maybe I can bring some of the corrupt politics back to Texas and plant the Texas Democratic machine in Houston. Wait until Texas is the most liberal state in the nation. Forever Blue!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top