Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city has easiest access to the outdoors and nature in general?
Denver, CO 16 41.03%
Portland, OR 23 58.97%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2013, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
654 posts, read 1,909,119 times
Reputation: 911

Advertisements

Denver will never match Portland's access to tug-of-war and mother-may-I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2013, 01:38 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,138,742 times
Reputation: 5860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Denver doesn't need a near by ocean or river gorge to be recognized as one of the top cities for recreational access. As far as parks, Denver has one of the largest park systems in the US.
Sure. Unfortunately, as I've already proven, it's not larger than Portland's. Which, as previously posted, is #6 on the Trust for Public Land's list while Denver is #13.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 01:21 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,512,704 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marat View Post
Denver will never match Portland's access to tug-of-war and mother-may-I.
Says the guy in Austin...



Oh, wait you guys have great access to ultimate frisbee and hackeysack...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,693,806 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnricoV View Post
Sure. Unfortunately, as I've already proven, it's not larger than Portland's. Which, as previously posted, is #6 on the Trust for Public Land's list while Denver is #13.
Portland got a 69.0 and Denver got a 60.0. That's not even a 10 point difference! But what I was saying is that Denver has the the most extensive park system (in the city limits) in the US with 205 parks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 10:36 PM
 
549 posts, read 1,558,782 times
Reputation: 441
I live in Denver - Portland has easier access, with a larger park in the city limits and easier access to the ocean (obviously) and at least one major mountain - with one huge caveat. It rains much of the year in Portland, making the activities a little less accessible. Denver's sunny most of the time. In a way, therefore, Denver has easier access to lots of outdoor activities.

They're both truly nice cities, IMHO, with easy access to the outdoors, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2013, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Keizer, OR
1,370 posts, read 3,052,100 times
Reputation: 1184
Denver is quite flat within its city limits and you have to travel a little ways to the west to get to the actual mountains. Portland has a lot more areas for outdoors access, in fact there are several large parks within the city limits that will make you feel like you are in the countryside.
I'm not trying to talk smack about Denver, but Portland is a lot more scenic.
After spending sometime at my cousin's flat in Downtown Denver, my vote goes to Portland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2013, 12:28 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,138,742 times
Reputation: 5860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Portland got a 69.0 and Denver got a 60.0. That's not even a 10 point difference! But what I was saying is that Denver has the the most extensive park system (in the city limits) in the US with 205 parks.
Portland has more acreage of parks (13,864) than Denver (5,902) does. 16.2% of the land in the city of Portland are Parks. In Denver, it's 6%.

So you think Denver has more parks ... maybe so. They're just a whole lot smaller than in Portland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 01:51 PM
 
95 posts, read 116,755 times
Reputation: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
One advantage of the Colorado Rockies for skiers also is that you have more multi-resort passes that are a real good discount. The Northwest ski areas have nothing like the Epic Pass, so you end up buying one pass and then buying lift tickets for the other areas--and the good spots are more spread out. So I'd say Denver(and Colorado Springs) is better for skiing--and weather too. The one advantage of Northwest skiing is the late season options where you can sometimes ski at Mt. Bachelor into July or you can ski the snowfields of Hood year round basically or other backcountry ski trips--Mt. St. Helens and Mt. Adams are excellent well into the summer months.
These are good points about skiing. If it is truly a comparison of Denver vs. Portland, though, then you have to factor in I-70 traffic from Denver to the ski resorts (all of those Epic passes!), which can be horrendous. And the other big issue is the lack of reliable snowpack in Colorado, which usually isn't a problem in the NW. The Portland skier has to be more willing to put up with nasty weather and variable snow conditions. Anyways, I'd take the NW for skiing any day, because of the long backcountry season mentioned above!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 12:02 AM
 
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
1,299 posts, read 2,772,612 times
Reputation: 1216
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDXJ View Post
These are good points about skiing. If it is truly a comparison of Denver vs. Portland, though, then you have to factor in I-70 traffic from Denver to the ski resorts (all of those Epic passes!), which can be horrendous. And the other big issue is the lack of reliable snowpack in Colorado, which usually isn't a problem in the NW. The Portland skier has to be more willing to put up with nasty weather and variable snow conditions. Anyways, I'd take the NW for skiing any day, because of the long backcountry season mentioned above!
Fair enough. I'd take Colorado for skiing (well, I snowboard) any day because the snow is lighter, drier, and generally more fluffy and buttery Also more bluebird days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top