|

10-25-2007, 03:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Albuquerque,New Mexico
3,490 posts, read 2,393,783 times
Reputation: 1094
|
|
Small or mid-sized cities with a boring skyline
There are also a few smaller or mid-sized cities that dont really have much of a skyline,choose which one you would like to see with a few more high-rises.
|
|

10-25-2007, 03:19 PM
|
|
Rangers FC supporter
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Chicagoland
17,004 posts, read 17,975,894 times
Reputation: 4769
|
|
|
Ive been to all but VA Beach and Shreveport, so I cant comment on those. As for the other cities, my vote goes to Tucson for having the most unappealing skyline of the bunch. The surroundings of Tucson (ie Catalina mts, etc) are gorgeous, but the city itself was dreadful. But, as always, just my opinion...
|
|

10-25-2007, 03:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Slow music for slow people."
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
1,725 posts, read 1,387,030 times
Reputation: 453
|
|
|
San Jose without a doubt. It's like the runt of the litter. SJ you need to keep up with your Bay area brothers SF and Oakland. With all that venture capital floating around San Jose it's obscene that the skyline is indistinguishable from a flyover nobody city.
|
|

10-25-2007, 03:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
1,140 posts, read 1,053,295 times
Reputation: 254
|
|
|
Wow. They are all sort of unremarkable. Don't know if I could pick one that is most boring... I guess I would NOT put Tucson on the list, despite it's low profile urban center, b/c the surrounding mountains are beautiful.
|
|

10-25-2007, 04:06 PM
|
|
Rangers FC supporter
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Chicagoland
17,004 posts, read 17,975,894 times
Reputation: 4769
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goozer
I guess I would NOT put Tucson on the list, despite it's low profile urban center, b/c the surrounding mountains are beautiful.
|
I agree there. But the topic is skylines, not background scenery.  Tucson's skyline was as exciting/awe inspiring/exciting as shoelaces.
|
|

10-25-2007, 04:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
3,265 posts, read 2,934,026 times
Reputation: 656
|
|
you need pictures! Here are some from flickr
Tucson,AZ
El Paso,TX
Virginia Beach,VA
Albuquerque,NM
San Jose,CA
Shreveport,Louisiana
Amarillo,TX
Lubbock,TX
i would go with lubbock
and i think the best on the list is Shreveport
|
|

10-25-2007, 04:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jersey City
2,618 posts, read 2,394,177 times
Reputation: 1092
|
|
|
I think each of these cities have pretty unimpressive skylines considering the population of each.
One thing to keep in mind about Virginia Beach, however, is that its downtown is only what, 4 or 5 years old?? Where those buildings are was wooded undeveloped land just a few years ago. That city is a collection of suburban districts with a newly found "Town Center." It is far from being an impressive city skyline though.
I am surprised how uninspiring El Paso is given its size. I think my vote would go there.
|
|

10-25-2007, 05:43 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
2,109 posts, read 2,458,379 times
Reputation: 715
|
|
Syracuse, NY.....even much smaller metros like Des Monies and Boise have better skylines than Syracuse. 
|
|

10-25-2007, 06:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
104 posts, read 127,260 times
Reputation: 22
|
|
|
McAllen, TX. Metro of 700,000 people and only one building of more than 10 floors.
|
|

10-25-2007, 06:43 PM
|
|
Bob Sanders
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The rolling hills of far NE Indiana
1,104 posts, read 896,215 times
Reputation: 492
|
|
|
Lubbock easily. Fort Wayne has a better skyline than Lubbock.
Honestly, I don't even think Lubbock has a skyline.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|