Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Californians are going to be forced to defend LA yet again, while everyone else picks Chicago cause they feel its more important due to stock exchanges.
And we all know stock exchanges are the ultimate factor in deciding a place to live.
Check page 12. Los Angeles or Chicago. Thread started by Kerrtown. Last post on that thread by Kerrtown. This has been done before.
I thought I did a poll similar to this before but my searches turned up fruitless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair
Why bother?
Californians are going to be forced to defend LA yet again, while everyone else picks Chicago cause they feel its more important due to stock exchanges.
And we all know stock exchanges are the ultimate factor in deciding a place to live.
Let's talk about freeways vs. commuter rail/'L', buses, and tollways/expressways. Who has the better (looking, less congested, etc.) Union Station? How about the lakeshore vs. the seashore. Or who has better designed (individual) skyscrapers instead of the skyline in general.
I didn't know L.A. had oil until I was researching why Oxy H.Q. is in L.A. instead of Houston.
About those stock exchanges, would you rather smell the money or be homeless and smell the L.A. air?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.