Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-26-2013, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,386,595 times
Reputation: 6288

Advertisements

The Los Angeles MSA has four cities that rank among the safest in the United States.

The Los Angeles CSA has SIX cities. Among them is the 6th safest large city in the United States...Los Angeles.

Not too shabby.

Last edited by RaymondChandlerLives; 08-26-2013 at 05:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,922,610 times
Reputation: 4890
The title of this thread is which city "feels" the most dangerous, not which city is the most dangerous.

That said, I've never "felt" in danger in any of these cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,807,804 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
You see, this is where it gets sticky. Compton is a bedroom community of Los Angeles County, but yes, "technically" it is its own city.

That's like saying Oakcliff isn't part of Dallas.

No, it's not. Oak Cliff is a neighborhood of Dallas. Compton is a separate municipality. The northeastern corner of Oak Cliff is immediately adjacent to downtown Dallas. At its closest point, Compton is over 8 miles from downtown Los Angeles. No part of Compton borders any part of Los Angeles (Willowbrook is in between).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,922,610 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
No, it's not. Oak Cliff is a neighborhood of Dallas. Compton is a separate municipality. The northeastern corner of Oak Cliff is immediately adjacent to downtown Dallas. At its closest point, Compton is over 8 miles from downtown Los Angeles. No part of Compton borders any part of Los Angeles (Willowbrook is in between).
Oak Cliff used to be its own town separate from Dallas. It was incorporated into the City of Dallas in 1903.

Los Angeles County covers 4,752 square miles.

Dallas County covers 908 square miles.

Fair comparison as both are considered bedroom communities, not suburbs of their main city. Your last sentence is misleading. Sure Compton doesn't touch Los Angeles, but it is close enough to throw a rock & hit from Mona Park. LA extends all the way south to & touches Long Beach.

Last edited by Metro Matt; 08-26-2013 at 05:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,510 posts, read 33,424,351 times
Reputation: 12137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
You see, this is where it gets sticky. Compton is a bedroom community of Los Angeles County, but yes, "technically" it is its own city.

That's like saying Oakcliff isn't part of Dallas.

Oak Cliff is a neighborhood in Dallas.
Compton is not a neighborhood in Los Angeles.
That's the difference whether you admit or not.

All of Oak Cliff isn't bad either. North Oak Cliff is a pretty decent area. I would say Oak Cliff isn't even the worse neighborhood in Dallas. That honor probably belongs to Pleseant Grove in SE Dallas.

All three cities are not even close to what they were 20 years ago. Both have made great strides. LA probably has made the greatest strides out of the three. Houston and Dallas are still relatively safe cities though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,922,610 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Oak Cliff is a neighborhood in Dallas.
Compton is not a neighborhood in Los Angeles.
That's the difference whether you admit or not.

All of Oak Cliff isn't bad either. North Oak Cliff is a pretty decent area. I would say Oak Cliff isn't even the worse neighborhood in Dallas. That honor probably belongs to Pleseant Grove in SE Dallas.
Perhaps I should have used PG as a better comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,510 posts, read 33,424,351 times
Reputation: 12137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Perhaps I should have used PG as a better comparison.
No. Because PG is in Dallas. Compton is not in LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,084 posts, read 15,807,804 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Oak Cliff used to be its own town separate from Dallas. It was incorporated into the City of Dallas in 1903.

Los Angeles County covers 4,752 square miles.

Dallas County covers 908 square miles.

Fair comparison as both are considered bedroom communities, not suburbs of their main city. Your last sentence is misleading. Sure Compton doesn't touch Los Angeles, but it is close enough to throw a rock & hit from Mona Park. LA extends all the way south to & touches Long Beach.
Compton is a working class city all of its own (and it is a suburb in every meaning of the word), completely separated from Los Angeles. I don't see how Oak Cliff all that analogous to Compton, other than both being primarily residential areas. Either way, Compton is not a part of Los Angeles in the way separate cities like Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, even East LA are. It's just another Gateway City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 06:12 PM
 
Location: The big blue yonder...
2,061 posts, read 3,726,298 times
Reputation: 1183
LA, no matter what the stats say, is always an explosive situation just waiting to blow... And you can feel it

All stats aside, LA definitely is going to "FEEL" more dangerous because of people's natural preconceived notions of LA. Same with NYC. NYC actually isn't very dangerous, but mention Brownsville, Bushwick, Flatbush, Harlem, East NY and Bed-Stuy to people and they almost shiver and thing NY is just SOOOO dangerous. But NY stats don't hold up to more dangerous cities like Philly, Baltimore and St. Louis at all...
Same thing happens with LA. You can throw out all the stats on how much more dangerous Houston & Dallas are all day, it won't make people feel any more safer in LA. They already have it engraved in their minds that LA is just a place you don't wanna play around with... And rightfully so.

Personally, I think, no matter what you say about stats, LA IS still more "Dangerous" anyway for 2 reasons...

1. LA IS the core for many gangs that are national. So, no matter if any other city has MORE gangs in it, still several of those gangs are being run by someone on the yard in Cali, someone IN LA or someone that got deported from LA. That creates an endlessly explosive situation BECAUSE whenever tides start to change and people start to gun at the tops of the gang structures, business might end up being handled in LA's streets.

2. Though LA has thousands of street gangs, a lot of them aren't "at war" right now... Yes, MS-13 & 18th St. are at war, but believe it or not, Bloods & Crips are not "at war" right now... 1 set having beef with another set isn't war... War was what was happening between Cs & Bs in the 80s, but they came to a "truce" in the early 90s & it still stands... The moment that truce is broken and it's war again, STAY FAR AWAY FROM LA.......


One more thing about LA's feel...... LA's street can be pretty crowded. Houston & Dallas can feel crowded as well, but LA's street scene traffic is on a different level. With such a wide variety of characters in a large crowd on the streets can easily make a person feel like there's the possibility of danger everywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2013, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,870,163 times
Reputation: 3419
^So perceptions and outdated stereotypes are more important than actual hard facts?

The displays of logic found in these forums astounds me...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top