Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Atlanta vs DC which city has the superior natural beauty?
DC 34 48.57%
Atlanta 36 51.43%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:05 AM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,933,711 times
Reputation: 27279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
Yes, that is why it feels more natural as opposed to man made/landscaped features.
Much of the river looks like this cutting through it
I find this to be advantageous, although it would be nice if downtown Atlanta did have a riverfront. Because Atlanta was built as a significant rail hub due to its geographical location along a strategic bend in the Eastern Continental Divide, that is the geographic feature that serves as our "riverfront" in a manner of speaking. It goes right through Underground Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,054 posts, read 1,235,467 times
Reputation: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
I find this to be advantageous, although it would be nice if downtown Atlanta did have a riverfront. Because Atlanta was built as a significant rail hub due to its geographical location along a strategic bend in the Eastern Continental Divide, that is the geographic feature that serves as our "riverfront" in a manner of speaking. It goes right through Underground Atlanta.

Yeah, it would make a big difference. Seems like I75/I85 and the non-stop line of cars flowing through the city serves as our riverfront...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:20 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,508,014 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillstuckinthesouth View Post
Right - that's a similar view to the one I get when I visit the Chattahoochee park right by my house. Personally, I find it more interesting to be in a city that has a larger river or body of water within the built landscape. When I'm in Jacksonville, for instance, I enjoy walking along the pedestrian trail next to the St. Johns River near downtown. The St. Johns is a very impressive river. Don't get me wrong, Atlanta's a pretty city (much more so than Jax). I just wish it had a major body of water.
Well yeah. That is cool too, but the thread was about superior natural beauty. While useful, I just wouldn't call it natural beauty so much, you still feel like you are in a manmade environment. The lakefront of Chicago is pretty and useful, yes. Natural beauty, eh... not so sure. On up in Wisconsin, Michigan, or even the northshore suburbs, the lake areas are *much* nicer with ravines and forests and whiter sandy beaches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,054 posts, read 1,235,467 times
Reputation: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
Well yeah. That is cool too, but the thread was about superior natural beauty. While useful, I just wouldn't call it natural beauty so much, you still feel like you are in a manmade environment. The lakefront of Chicago is pretty? Natural beauty, eh... not so sure. On up in Wisconsin, Michigan, or even the northshore suburbs, the lake areas are *much* nicer with ravines and forests and whiter sandy beaches.

But the river in Jax and the lake in Chicago are integral natural features of those cities. I don't think we need to be so restrictive in the definition of natural beauty.

After all, the question is which CITY has superior natural beauty. Without its lake, Chicago would be more like Dallas. As for D.C., I don't think the Potomac is nearly as prominent a natural feature as Lake Michigan or the St. Johns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:34 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,508,014 times
Reputation: 5884
True...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:40 AM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,933,711 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillstuckinthesouth View Post
But the river in Jax and the lake in Chicago are integral natural features of those cities. I don't think we need to be so restrictive in the definition of natural beauty.

After all, the question is which CITY has superior natural beauty. Without its lake, Chicago would be more like Dallas. As for D.C., I don't think the Potomac is nearly as prominent a natural feature as Lake Michigan or the St. Johns.
Very true. That's why I think the two cities are more or less even here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:40 AM
 
Location: The Magnolia City
8,928 posts, read 14,335,594 times
Reputation: 4853
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcave360 View Post
In Atlanta's defense, the Chattahoochee River doesn't look that bad though. (Not my pics)

I'm pretty sure this pic is not of the Chattahoochee River or Atlanta, and I'm not sure why the Wikipedia page it comes from says so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,054 posts, read 1,235,467 times
Reputation: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairobi View Post
I'm pretty sure this pic is not of the Chattahoochee River or Atlanta, and I'm not sure why the Wikipedia page it comes from says so.

Thank you - I was going to mention that. Not sure what city is pictured there, but it doesn't exactly look beautiful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:48 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,508,014 times
Reputation: 5884
That looks like St. Louis north of the arch.

DC definitely is more interesting along the water

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-14-2013, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,054 posts, read 1,235,467 times
Reputation: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
That looks like St. Louis north of the arch.

My apologies to St. Louis... that view of the city combined with the smog/fog just don't make for a very nice image.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top