Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which City Metro has best affluent suburbs?
Greater NY 18 42.86%
Chicagoland 9 21.43%
Southland 15 35.71%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-14-2013, 09:00 PM
 
12,883 posts, read 13,976,233 times
Reputation: 18449

Advertisements

Considering NJ and CT's wealth (2nd and 3rd in the nation by incomes respectively, behind MD), I'd say the NYC metro region probably wins. Northern NJ and southwestern CT have a lot of money and a lot of beautiful wealthy suburbs within the metro area. A few (3 to 4) of NJ's counties routinely make the list of top 10 wealthiest in the nation. Greenwich and the Hamptons are two extremely well known wealthy areas and Alpine NJ is lesser known but home to tons of celebrities and wealthy people alike. Then there are the dozens of other lesser known towns and cities known locally for their wealth. Lots of money around here, and no doubt in LA too. I could see arguments for both LA and NYC area to 'win' on this one but IMO Chicago is third either way. LA would probably win on scenery but that's not to say Chicago and NYC don't have beautiful areas in the cities and metros as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2013, 01:09 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,201,724 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
Perfect weather and beaches doesnt = wealthy
Look at Brazil
I think most people (not me, though) would prefer LA's dry 70F with a breeze year-round over Brazil's humid and hot weather all year. Though Brazil obviously has better beaches. ANYWAYS, the debate wasn't whether all places with nice weather and beaches are always rich. LA's suburbs are rich, have nice weather and good beaches nearby. Your argument doesn't really make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 05:44 AM
 
2,029 posts, read 2,358,288 times
Reputation: 4702
Default Its all up to what you consider "best"

The most recent Money magazine list pf highest earning towns was topped by Scarsdale NY and included 2 CT towns as well as Rye in the top ten. It also had two suburbs of Chicago (Winnetka and Hinsdale) but no LA suburbs (just one SF town, Orinda). While NY and LA may have alot of nice areas, they also have alot of ugly areas as well, while Chicago is more uniform, less highs and lows. Because of the extreme highs for both NY and LA ( Greenwich and Beverly Hills ) v Chicago (north shore and western suburbs) they might win on affluence, but maybe not on livability or desireability. What is "best" is really subjective; if it were up to the late film director John Hughs, it would be Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 08:29 AM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,486,569 times
Reputation: 9263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaii4evr View Post
I think most people (not me, though) would prefer LA's dry 70F with a breeze year-round over Brazil's humid and hot weather all year. Though Brazil obviously has better beaches. ANYWAYS, the debate wasn't whether all places with nice weather and beaches are always rich. LA's suburbs are rich, have nice weather and good beaches nearby. Your argument doesn't really make sense.
My argument is that weather doesn't make a place more affluent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 09:48 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,447,987 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanQuest View Post

NY
-Greenwich
-New Canaan
-Bronxville
why those 3? Scarsdale has a slightly than Bronxville. I don't care much for any of those listed, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 09:49 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,447,987 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
Perfect weather and beaches doesnt = wealthy
Look at Brazil
The wealthy parts of Rio are right by the beach, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 10:03 AM
 
12,883 posts, read 13,976,233 times
Reputation: 18449
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
why those 3? Scarsdale has a slightly than Bronxville. I don't care much for any of those listed, though.
I was wondering the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Cleveland
3,412 posts, read 5,121,352 times
Reputation: 3083
Cleveland. Shaker Heights is one of the best suburbs in the USA. Hunting Valley is the 5th richest city per capita in the USA. Cleveland has some amazing Early 20th century art deco and neoclassical mansions. Remember, the titans of industry, such as Rockefeller, DuPont, Glidden, Sherwin and Williams, once lived here, and many of their homes are still standing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 10:21 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,496,781 times
Reputation: 5879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleverfield View Post
Cleveland. Shaker Heights is one of the best suburbs in the USA. Hunting Valley is the 5th richest city per capita in the USA. Cleveland has some amazing Early 20th century art deco and neoclassical mansions. Remember, the titans of industry, such as Rockefeller, DuPont, Glidden, Sherwin and Williams, once lived here, and many of their homes are still standing.
cool story
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2013, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,201,724 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
My argument is that weather doesn't make a place more affluent.
Yes but nobody was making the argument that it did, so it doesn't make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top