Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: More Urban: Seattle vs Vancouver
Seattle 45 37.82%
Vancouver 74 62.18%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2013, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,700,318 times
Reputation: 5872

Advertisements

Which city do you think feels more urban and larger? Seattle or Vancouver (BC)?

Take into consideration...

Density:
Vibrancy:
Neighborhoods:
Which feels bigger?:
Public Transportation:

Last edited by Mezter; 12-06-2013 at 05:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2013, 05:50 PM
 
351 posts, read 499,762 times
Reputation: 446
Vancouver, plus Seattle's downtown seems...desolate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 05:54 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,961,697 times
Reputation: 8436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Which city do you think feels more urban? Seattle or Vancouver (BC)?

Take into consideration...

Density:
Vibrancy:
Neighborhoods:
Which feels bigger?:
Public Transportation:
Don't know about more urban but as far as feeling big goes, I'm casting my vote for Vancouver.

Seattle is a pretty nice place and it's big (and urban) by United States standards but I think this goes to Vancouver. It's not like it's leagues ahead of Seattle but I have spent a fair amount of time in Vancouver, not so much in Seattle but have seen it, recently in fact, and Vancouver is designed to feel larger and definitely look larger than what it really is.

Vancouver is a very condensed city, literally smashed between the waters and mountains at such a close scale, advantage one. Vancouver is also a vertical city, advantage two. Those two things generally lend to a more ideal walking zone, third advantage.

As you can see here, Vancouver is vertically built up over a vast but still condensed amount of area, the core of the city serves as a transfer point to it's natural attractions like Stanley Park or to it's suburbs.

Vancouver, you don't really have to be more than 3-5 kilometers from the core area of the city to access among North America's richest natural settings and you still get to keep the city aspect alive too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,700,318 times
Reputation: 5872
The amount of highrises in Vancouver just make it look densely populated and urban to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:15 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,508,014 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
The amount of highrises in Vancouver just make it look densely populated and urban to me.
Vancouver easy, just looking at density #'s alone it is double Seattle's at a range close to 50sq miles. And considering they are both relatively safe, clean and first world cities, the layouts would have to call for denser housing stock and a more urban environment to achieve this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Auburn, New York
1,772 posts, read 3,518,445 times
Reputation: 3076
Duh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,700,318 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawn.Davenport View Post
Duh
What?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 08:12 PM
 
1,581 posts, read 2,824,761 times
Reputation: 484
Vancouver is more urban than Seattle , Seattle has been 10 years behind Vancouver for years lol . Seattle has Vancouver developers building several towers now lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 09:52 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,467,780 times
Reputation: 15184
Vancouver's downtown felt more bustling to me, and the surrounding neighborhoods somewhat denser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 10:18 PM
 
Location: Both coasts
1,574 posts, read 5,116,314 times
Reputation: 1520
Seattle has the big freeways cutting thru the city so driving-wise, Seattle has always felt bigger to me.

In terms of 'urbanity'- with Vancouver, the city core is denser and the downtown is more congested than Seattle's downtown, so from this perspective, it feels more urban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top