Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Washington D.C. vs San Francisco
DC 58 41.13%
SF 83 58.87%
Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2013, 12:36 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
27 posts, read 63,040 times
Reputation: 80

Advertisements

Livability, economy, quality of life, nightlife.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2013, 01:26 AM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,886,156 times
Reputation: 3419
SF is more beautiful. Don't mind the homeless drug addicts.

DC is more livable for the average professional. It is too expensive for the average person without a professional job, but not as insanely-overpriced as SF where even a professional career wouldn't earn you a high enough salary to live well there, unless your job is in the tech industry and you get paid a fortune for your salary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 02:29 AM
 
3 posts, read 16,037 times
Reputation: 20
I prefer the people and nightlife in DC. The only thing SF has better is restaurants and better shopping. I like going to Tyson's Corner so I don't mind.

DC is far wealthier and far more educated on average than SF and we have much cheaper and nicer more modern housing. IMO, the average San Francisco resident is even poorer than the below average resident of Houston. The Govt made a new poverty measure that adjusts for COL, and home ownership, etc and now the West is considered the poorest region of the USA. Even worse than the South. My close friend lives in San Francisco and earns $95k. I live in DC and earn $85k and I'm definitely wealthier and have nicer things than him.

SF is also a very rough city. We also don't have really bad slums like your find in SF (Oakland). And the city is a more pleasant place vs the rat and homeless infested SF.

If you're middle income and want to live a cushy life, move to Houston, if you want to live an Upper Middle Class life with stability an a great level of comfort then move here to DC. If you're rich and can afford anything then move to NYC or Los Angeles.

I don't get the appeal of SF.

Last edited by Potomac10; 12-18-2013 at 02:39 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 06:56 AM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,119,808 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potomac10 View Post
I prefer the people and nightlife in DC. The only thing SF has better is restaurants and better shopping. I like going to Tyson's Corner so I don't mind.

DC is far wealthier and far more educated on average than SF and we have much cheaper and nicer more modern housing. IMO, the average San Francisco resident is even poorer than the below average resident of Houston. The Govt made a new poverty measure that adjusts for COL, and home ownership, etc and now the West is considered the poorest region of the USA. Even worse than the South. My close friend lives in San Francisco and earns $95k. I live in DC and earn $85k and I'm definitely wealthier and have nicer things than him.

SF is also a very rough city. We also don't have really bad slums like your find in SF (Oakland). And the city is a more pleasant place vs the rat and homeless infested SF.

If you're middle income and want to live a cushy life, move to Houston, if you want to live an Upper Middle Class life with stability an a great level of comfort then move here to DC. If you're rich and can afford anything then move to NYC or Los Angeles.

I don't get the appeal of SF.
I have some friends here moved from northern Virginia suburban DC, they hated it. Their opinion on living there; overpriced, terrible traffic, terrible weather, rude people, clueless professionals collecting checks. They made a fortune off of them though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 11:49 AM
 
632 posts, read 932,998 times
Reputation: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potomac10 View Post

SF is also a very rough city. We also don't have really bad slums like your find in SF (Oakland). And the city is a more pleasant place vs the rat and homeless infested SF.


I don't get the appeal of SF.
Oakland really isn't that bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 12:04 PM
 
3 posts, read 16,037 times
Reputation: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd_96 View Post
Oakland really isn't that bad.
Have you seen their crime rates? OMG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 12:33 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,199,461 times
Reputation: 11355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potomac10 View Post
I prefer the people and nightlife in DC. The only thing SF has better is restaurants and better shopping. I like going to Tyson's Corner so I don't mind.

DC is far wealthier and far more educated on average than SF and we have much cheaper and nicer more modern housing. IMO, the average San Francisco resident is even poorer than the below average resident of Houston. The Govt made a new poverty measure that adjusts for COL, and home ownership, etc and now the West is considered the poorest region of the USA. Even worse than the South. My close friend lives in San Francisco and earns $95k. I live in DC and earn $85k and I'm definitely wealthier and have nicer things than him.

SF is also a very rough city. We also don't have really bad slums like your find in SF (Oakland). And the city is a more pleasant place vs the rat and homeless infested SF.

If you're middle income and want to live a cushy life, move to Houston, if you want to live an Upper Middle Class life with stability an a great level of comfort then move here to DC. If you're rich and can afford anything then move to NYC or Los Angeles.

I don't get the appeal of SF.
So what you're trying to say is you've never been to San Fran and don't really know anything about the city?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2013, 12:35 PM
 
632 posts, read 932,998 times
Reputation: 739
Haha no but I've lived there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 12:31 AM
 
Location: SW King County, WA
6,416 posts, read 8,278,655 times
Reputation: 6595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potomac10 View Post
I prefer the people and nightlife in DC. The only thing SF has better is restaurants and better shopping. I like going to Tyson's Corner so I don't mind.

DC is far wealthier and far more educated on average than SF and we have much cheaper and nicer more modern housing. IMO, the average San Francisco resident is even poorer than the below average resident of Houston. The Govt made a new poverty measure that adjusts for COL, and home ownership, etc and now the West is considered the poorest region of the USA. Even worse than the South. My close friend lives in San Francisco and earns $95k. I live in DC and earn $85k and I'm definitely wealthier and have nicer things than him.

SF is also a very rough city. We also don't have really bad slums like your find in SF (Oakland). And the city is a more pleasant place vs the rat and homeless infested SF.

If you're middle income and want to live a cushy life, move to Houston, if you want to live an Upper Middle Class life with stability an a great level of comfort then move here to DC. If you're rich and can afford anything then move to NYC or Los Angeles.

I don't get the appeal of SF.
More educated? Based on what? Where are you getting this info from?

BTW Oakland isn't part of SF. It's not all slums either. Perhaps you should actually visit the entire Bay Area which is a far more desirable place to live than the DC metro area before you spout off your opinions as truth. I've lived in both for quite some time. Have you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2013, 12:51 AM
 
1,950 posts, read 3,527,752 times
Reputation: 2770
D.C. is such a major hub, a really beautiful capital. Not sure how to measure "better", but its presence is definitely more significant than SF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top