Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Brightest Future
Sacramento 100 85.47%
Fresno 10 8.55%
Bakersfield 7 5.98%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2017, 10:42 PM
 
6,900 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877

Advertisements

Which of the cities is greener?

Rain totals to date Feb 9, 2017

Sacramento - 24.49 inches

Fresno - 11.02 inches

Bakersfield - 6.48 inches

Sacramento has 122% more rain than Fresno; well over 2 Times more rain.

Sacramento has 278% more rain than Bakersfield; near 4 Times more rain.

 
Old 03-09-2017, 07:57 PM
 
6,900 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877
The West dominates ranking of most health-conscious cities in America - SFGate

Sacramento nationally ranked in top 5 of the Most Health Conscious Cities nationally.

Fresno is NOT EVEN in the top 25.

Most Health Conscience Cities in California. List taken from a National List hence the inclusion of out-of-state cities. Top 25 Cities

1. Portland
2. Washington DC
3. Colorado Springs
4. Sacramento
5. Irvine
6. San Diego
7. Seattle
8. Denver
9. Tucson
10. Chula Vista
11. Oakland
12. Buffalo
13. Orlando
14. San Francisco
15. Norfolk
16. San Jose
17. St. Petersburg, FL
18. Tampa
19. Aurora, CO
20. Virginia Beach
21. Jacksonville
22. Corpus Christi
23. Cincinnati
24. Boston
25. Minneapolis
 
Old 03-09-2017, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,488 posts, read 1,642,537 times
Reputation: 4136
Bakersfield is really improving its downtown area. Don't be surprised if one day Bako is the hip city of the valley!
 
Old 03-17-2017, 07:15 AM
 
6,900 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877
Young Families, Cost of Living

See this ranking

https://www.movebuddha.com/blog/best...oung-families/

Sacramento in the Top 5 of Nationally Ranked Cities for the Best to Raise a Family


Neither, Fresno nor Bakersfield made the list.
 
Old 03-24-2017, 05:37 AM
 
6,900 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877
POPULATION Numbers for 2016 (PCSA)

SACRAMENTO - 2,567,451

Fresno - 1,134,612

Sacramento is 2.26 Times Larger than Fresno, or 226%.

Last Year (2016)

Sacramento gained 30,757 people,

Fresno gained only 8,175 people

Sacramento gained nearly 3 Times more people than Fresno last year.
 
Old 03-24-2017, 07:39 AM
 
102 posts, read 123,971 times
Reputation: 150
Anyone who thinks Fresno can match up to Sacramento hasn't spent time in either. Fresno has a ton of potential, but kinda botches everything it attempts - if they can pull off the reopening of Fulton street it might do great things for the city core, but I wouldn't hold my breath. Being in the valley, Sac has everything that makes Fresno good (proximity to mountains, mild winters, great produce - the surrounding area of Sac is way nicer than the Fresno area, too, with the exception of Yosemite and Kings Canyon in Fresno) but has qualities of an actual city (walkable core, night life, usable transit, a downtown that doesn't look like a post-apocalyptic zombie movie). Plus the proximity to the Bay Area will always be in Sac's favor.
 
Old 03-24-2017, 09:10 PM
 
6,900 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA-CHI-CO View Post
Anyone who thinks Fresno can match up to Sacramento hasn't spent time in either. Fresno has a ton of potential, but kinda botches everything it attempts - if they can pull off the reopening of Fulton street it might do great things for the city core, but I wouldn't hold my breath. Being in the valley, Sac has everything that makes Fresno good (proximity to mountains, mild winters, great produce - the surrounding area of Sac is way nicer than the Fresno area, too, with the exception of Yosemite and Kings Canyon in Fresno) but has qualities of an actual city (walkable core, night life, usable transit, a downtown that doesn't look like a post-apocalyptic zombie movie). Plus the proximity to the Bay Area will always be in Sac's favor.
Well said! Concerning population, Fresno is where Sacramento was in the early 1970's, with a few differences that still hold true, Sacramento, then and now, has a much higher income level and much higher educational attainment level and much lower poverty level.

Back in the 1970's, Sac had a growing and internationally respected University (UC Davis) that attracted a tech boom in the 1980's. And UC Davis has big plans to keep growing and gaining even higher nationally.

Also, SAC has always had some form of high tech during and after WWII with the two Air Force Bases it had through the 90's and the Aerojet Co. which today still designs and manufactures Rockets for the space industry. Intel's Research and Development is in Folsom-SacCounty.

Another thing, Lake Tahoe and the Northern Sierra's near Sac offer has much, and more accessible recreation than Yosemite in terms of hotel accommodations, entertainment, and ski resorts. In regards to Yosemite, it's only an extra hour drive for us. But I would rather be closer to Tahoe/Reno than Yosemite.
 
Old 04-01-2017, 06:40 AM
 
6,900 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877
2015 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT in Millions of Dollars

SACRAMENTO Metro Area- $118,822

Fresno Metro Area - $38,830

Bakersfield Metro Area - $35,839

Fresno's Metro is twice the size of Bakersfield's Metro so you would think Fresno Metro would have twice the GDP, but it does not. Either Bakersfield is very productive or Fresno is very unproductive.

Sacramento Metro is twice the size of Fresno's Metro yet Sacramento's Metro has more than three (3) times the GDP as Fresno. Sacramento is much more per productive per capita than Fresno.
 
Old 04-01-2017, 10:51 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,743,952 times
Reputation: 17398
I voted for Bakersfield because it's not the "proper" answer.
 
Old 04-01-2017, 10:54 AM
 
295 posts, read 355,535 times
Reputation: 292
Sacramento is hands down the best city of NorCal. I would rate Sac higher than entire Bay Area. This coming from a Angelino (LA Native)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top