Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city will be gentrified into oblivion first?
Manhattan (New York) 15 34.09%
Washington, DC 20 45.45%
Boston 9 20.45%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2014, 07:34 AM
 
275 posts, read 416,081 times
Reputation: 315

Advertisements

Which NE city do you find becoming the most lifeless, bland, and vanilla?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2014, 07:41 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,156,607 times
Reputation: 14762
None of the above.
A city would really have to fall onto VERY hard times in order for that to happen. Think Detroit. It's in real danger of losing its character due to salivating developers who are all to anxious to obliterate it on the cheap to turn a fast buck. NYC, Boston and DC have way too much success and entrenched power for that to happen anytime soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,931,071 times
Reputation: 8365
Probably DC with it's small borders. People forget about Washington Heights, Inwood, etc. Manhattan also has a higher poverty rate than DC or Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Maryland, The Original Catholic colony.
249 posts, read 399,341 times
Reputation: 145
DC hands down.
The city is very bland now and the parts that aren't are either ghetto, country, or both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 11:30 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Gentrification does not make a city bland or lifeless so not sure where your going with that comment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 11:31 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorthEast Coast 202 View Post
DC hands down.
The city is very bland now and the parts that aren't are either ghetto, country, or both.

This is stupid, DC is more vibrant than it has been the last 25 years, do you even live in DC?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 11:33 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
None of the above.
A city would really have to fall onto VERY hard times in order for that to happen. Think Detroit. It's in real danger of losing its character due to salivating developers who are all to anxious to obliterate it on the cheap to turn a fast buck. NYC, Boston and DC have way too much success and entrenched power for that to happen anytime soon.
Very interesting point about Detroit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:15 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,560 posts, read 28,652,113 times
Reputation: 25153
Gentrification has greatly IMPROVED Washington, D.C., whereas 25 years ago much of the city was off-limits due to crime, drugs and general degradation. The city is also more racially and ethnically diverse now.

So bring it on, I say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:48 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
Gentrification has greatly IMPROVED Washington, D.C., whereas 25 years ago much of the city was off-limits due to crime, drugs and general degradation. The city is also more racially and ethnically diverse now.

So bring it on, I say.
+1

Exactly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:59 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,494,000 times
Reputation: 9263
Oh no, more anti-Gentrification crybabies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top