Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Probably because there's 50 threads essentially about the same thing.
Now you know that normally doesn't seem to stop people on this forum But then again, maybe that's a sign that people are finally getting tired of the constant repetitiveness.
Now you know that normally doesn't seem to stop people on this forum But then again, maybe that's a sign that people are finally getting tired of the constant repetitiveness.
SF, no question. Chicago is the most cosmopolitan city between the coasts, but is not as cosmopolitan as NYC, LA, SF, DC, Miami.
Cosmopolitan and sophistication are different. I think San Francisco is no doubt more sophisticated than Chicago, but being cosmopolitan is more about being able to relate to everyone, not just upper-middle-class white and Asian-American professionals.
Chicago, with it's diverse economy, haute culture, pop culture, high-end fashion, monster truck rallies, gay rodeos, Polish cathedrals, mosques, molecular gastronomy, factories, immigrant communities, African-American history, tourist traps, cocktail lounges, hot dog stands, world-class universities, storefront theaters, and dive bars, is more cosmopolitan than San Francisco.
just tonight, while exploring Hong Kong.....at the very exclusive Pacific Place mall....came across this Dan Ryan place,,,from that provincial backwater.
Cosmopolitan and sophistication are different. I think San Francisco is no doubt more sophisticated than Chicago, but being cosmopolitan is more about being able to relate to everyone, not just upper-middle-class white and Asian-American professionals.
Chicago, with it's diverse economy, haute culture, pop culture, high-end fashion, monster truck rallies, gay rodeos, Polish cathedrals, mosques, molecular gastronomy, factories, immigrant communities, African-American history, tourist traps, cocktail lounges, hot dog stands, world-class universities, storefront theaters, and dive bars, is more cosmopolitan than San Francisco.
Cosmopolitan and sophistication are different. I think San Francisco is no doubt more sophisticated than Chicago, but being cosmopolitan is more about being able to relate to everyone, not just upper-middle-class white and Asian-American professionals.
Chicago, with it's diverse economy, haute culture, pop culture, high-end fashion, monster truck rallies, gay rodeos, Polish cathedrals, mosques, molecular gastronomy, factories, immigrant communities, African-American history, tourist traps, cocktail lounges, hot dog stands, world-class universities, storefront theaters, and dive bars, is more cosmopolitan than San Francisco.
Yup... Bay Area has no black people or black history, nothing gay there, no pretty cathedrals from other cultures, a very monocentric economy, no immigrant communities, no storefront theaters, Stanford UCSF and the University of California are just backwoods second rate schools nobody knows about, no cocktail lounges or dive bars, NO tourist traps, no factories, no mosques... It is a land of all white people, no history, and the economy runs off fruitloops. Lol... Some people... /sarcasm I'll give you monster truck rallies haha, and if having monster truck rallies and a hot dog stand makes a city cosmopolitan, I am glad San Francisco is not cosmopolitan!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.