Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is the second most important in the nation?
LA 211 35.34%
Chicago 171 28.64%
DC 81 13.57%
SF 39 6.53%
Boston 62 10.39%
Houston 33 5.53%
Voters: 597. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2009, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,624 posts, read 3,290,755 times
Reputation: 262

Advertisements

Which is the second most important city in the US based on its cultural and economical contribution to the nation?
Please vote....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2009, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Irvine,Oc,Ca
1,423 posts, read 4,686,241 times
Reputation: 689
Chicago and LA!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 07:31 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,347,216 times
Reputation: 2975
Chicago, because LA is 1B.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 07:54 PM
 
17 posts, read 57,191 times
Reputation: 31
Well technically Chicago is the "Second City"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Irvine,Oc,Ca
1,423 posts, read 4,686,241 times
Reputation: 689
Chicago is the Second "American City",LA not technically "American",Anyways Chicago is a Well kept Secret!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 08:18 PM
 
5,816 posts, read 15,912,350 times
Reputation: 4741
I can see how L.A. and Chicago might seem like the obvious choices, especially if you're talking about being influential in a number of areas, but I'm inclined to go with Washington. In the one area where D.C. has an impact, it has a BIG impact.

The question could get tricky, though, if you moved out of the territory of looking only at present-day influence. If you consider impact over the entire course of American history, Boston moves up the list, and then I would also add Philly.

But, going with the present day, I'll say D.C.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:33 PM
 
10,624 posts, read 26,731,484 times
Reputation: 6776
You forgot to put NYC on the list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,624 posts, read 3,290,755 times
Reputation: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by uptown_urbanist View Post
You forgot to put NYC on the list.
No. I was asking about the second most important city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:56 PM
 
2,757 posts, read 5,643,675 times
Reputation: 1125
Dementor, how do you feel about Chicago? Don't answer that here's my list:
*D.C.
*Chicago
*Boston
*San Fran
*Houston
*Los Angeles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,657 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by dementor View Post
Which is the second most important city in the US based on its cultural and economical contribution to the nation?
Please vote....
There actually was a ranking that specifically measured economic and cultural impact.

Here it is

THE WORLD'S MOST WELL ROUNDED CITIES by GaWC released in 2004

Quote:
Five levels of global city are identified. First, and clearly above all others, there are London and New York. All previous research has highlighted the dominance of these two cities in the world city hierarchy (Taylor 2004a) and they emerge here as the most important 'all-round' global contributors. They are followed by three cities that make smaller all-round contribution and with particular cultural strengths: Los Angeles, Paris and San Francisco. Finally, among 'all-rounders' there are seven incipient world cities identified in Table 11. In the second category of global niche cities, the three leading Pacific Asian cities are critical economic nodes in the world city network and there are also three critical nodes that are non-economic: Brussels, Geneva and Washington, DC. Thus a total of 18 cities are deemed to be global, actual or incipient.

The remaining world cities encompass articulator and niche cities. The former are focussed upon subnets and there are 13 distributed between the three non-economic spheres. Classic examples are Vienna at the centre of a UN agency subnet and Nairobi at the centre of a NGO subnet. There are 21niche world cities identified of which seven have important concentrations of economic activities and 14 concentrations of non-economic activities. Frankfurt is typical of the first group with its concentration of banks while Manila is typical of the second group with its concentration of NGOs.

These two sets of cities represent the upper echelons of the hierarchical tendencies in world city networks. To reiterate a point made in the introduction, they do not encompass all globalization processes, all cities as so involved, but they are the key locales that network formation agents are using in their everyday activities that are creating world city networks.
GLOBAL CITIES

Well rounded global
Very large contribution: London and New York Smaller contribution and with cultural bias: Los Angeles, Paris and San Francisco

ii Incipient global cities: Amsterdam, Boston, Chicago, Madrid, Milan, Moscow, Toronto

Global niche cities - specialised global contributions

i Economic: Hong Kong, Singapore, and Tokyo

ii Political and social: Brussels, Geneva, and Washington

WORLD CITIES

Subnet articulator cities

i Cultural: Berlin, Copenhagen, Melbourne, Munich, Oslo, Rome, Stockholm Political: Bangkok, Beijing, Vienna

ii Social: Manila, Nairobi, Ottawa

Worldwide leading cities

i Primarily economic global contributions: Frankfurt, Miami, Munich, Osaka, Singapore, Sydney, Zurich

ii Primarily non-economic global contributions: Abidjan, Addis Ababa, Atlanta, Basle, Barcelona, Cairo, Denver, Harare, Lyon, Manila, Mexico City, Mumbai, New Delhi, Shanghai

GaWC Research Bulletin 146
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top