Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-08-2014, 03:42 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,971,228 times
Reputation: 1437

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Just as Dallas (Arlington tax payers & Jerry Jones really) built Cowboys Stadium out of pure jealousy of Reliant Stadium having the 1st retractable roof in the NFL giving the City of Houston 2 retractable roof stadiums including Minute Maid Park.

The Astrodome in Houston was the 1st air conditioned stadium of its size.

Houston sets the standard all other cities follow when it comes to building stadiums.
Correction that is enclosed stadiums. If the Astrodome is such a feat of architecture of historical proportions then why is the city going to tear it down? The reason is the powers that be in Houston have no foresight when it comes to branding it's city for the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2014, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,879,071 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
Correction that is enclosed stadiums. If the Astrodome is such a feat of architecture of historical proportions then why is the city going to tear it down? The reason is the powers that be in Houston have no foresight when it comes to branding it's city for the future.
The Astrodome has hosted everyone from Mickey Mantle, to Elvis Presley, to Evil Kneivel, to Pink Floyd, to Supercross events.

It has served its purpose well for the past 50 years, lasting even longer than Texas Stadium in Dallas, which was also demolished.

The only major Texas cities that retain their history are San Antonio & Fort Worth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 05:17 PM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,814,440 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
The Astrodome has hosted everyone from Mickey Mantle, to Elvis Presley, to Evil Kneiviel, to Pink Floyd, to Super Cross events.

It has served its purpose well for the past 50 years lasting even longer than Texas Stadium in Dallas, which was also demolished.

The only Texas cities that retain their history are San Antonio & Fort Worth.
^ Not really accurate. The Astrodome is ICONIC and should be preserved. Just like Dallas has preserved its ICONIC stadium, the Cotton Bowl. Texas Stadium in Dallas was a tacky 70's stadium....nothing iconic about it....it wasn't famous like The Cotton Bowl or The Astrodome.

Look at downtown Dallas and downtown Houston and then state which one has done a decent job of saving historic structures and which one has done an awful job. Dallas wins hands down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,879,071 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
^ Not really accurate. The Astrodome is ICONIC and should be preserved. Just like Dallas has preserved its ICONIC stadium, the Cotton Bowl. Texas Stadium in Dallas was a tacky 70's stadium....nothing iconic about it....it wasn't famous like The Cotton Bowl or The Astrodome.

Look at downtown Dallas and downtown Houston and then state which one has done a decent job of saving historic structures and which one has done an awful job. Dallas wins hands down.
You're comparing apples to oranges here. The Astrodome to the Cottonbowl is not accurate. Its era was in the 1970's, 80's, & 90's along with Texas Stadium. A better comparison to the Cottonbowl is Rice Stadium. It has hosted the Oilers, Super Bowls, & even John F. Kennedy gave a famous speech there. At 70,000 seats, Rice Stadium was the 2nd largest college stadium after the Cotton Bowl in Dallas.

Cottonbowl - 1930

Rice Stadium - 1950

Astrodome - 1965

Texas Stadium - 1970

Last edited by Metro Matt; 05-08-2014 at 05:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 05:42 PM
 
Location: OC
12,734 posts, read 9,393,251 times
Reputation: 10524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastphilly View Post
These threads are popping up because Houston homers believe their population numbers have made their city relevant with other US star cities. Houston is a joke!
This is true. Austin, imo, is the jewel of this state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 05:51 PM
 
Location: OC
12,734 posts, read 9,393,251 times
Reputation: 10524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzrovian View Post
Why so much derision towards Houston? Of course everyone is aware of its glaring urban deficiencies. But there is no denying that it has become a powerful metropolis that's leaving its mark -- from its great food and cultural scene to its world class medical facilities to its airport connections to its preeminence in a number of important economic sectors. I, for one, think that comparisons with Sacramento are off base. These cities are not in the same league.
I agree with him. Saying you have something "bigger than San Francisco's reeks of desperation."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 06:04 PM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,087,164 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
LA is the 2nd largest US city 2nd largest metro while Houston is the 4th largest US city 5th largest metro.

Not much of a gap there.

Sacramento is the 35th largest US city 27th largest metro.

A better comparison to Sacramento is Austin (both state capitals & similar skylines) or San Antonio.
Austin is the 35th largest metro. S.A. is the 24th or 25th. S.A has an urbanized area about 500,000 more than Austin's and about 200,000 more than Sac. Metro wise Sac is almost the size, Austin has 1.88 million in it's metro not quite 2.0 million. Metro population and skylines don't always mean a bigger city. There is a metro are that's a little bigger than San Antonio's but its urbanized area is even smaller than Austin's.

Urbanized area is a better indicator of true size.

Houston is not in L.A.'s league as far as population or urbanized area, L.A. is a mega city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,879,071 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylord_Focker View Post
This is true. Austin, imo, is the jewel of this state.
Austin will never be as cosmopolitan or metropolitan as Houston or Dallas. Its not a very diverse city quite honestly. Lots of Whites & Hispanics very few Blacks.

Most of its Asian population consists of Indian & Chinese. Not much diversity to write home about there either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 07:31 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
2,033 posts, read 1,971,228 times
Reputation: 1437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Austin will never be as cosmopolitan or metropolitan as Houston or Dallas. Its not a very diverse city quite honestly. Lots of Whites & Hispanics very few Blacks.

Most of its Asian population consists of Indian & Chinese. Not much diversity to write home about there either.
You are so wrapped up on diversity. Last time I checked Tokyo isn't a diverse city with an even mix of ethnic people. Tokyo is a very cosmopolitan city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2014, 07:40 PM
 
1,064 posts, read 1,895,728 times
Reputation: 322
Houston isn't trying to be like L.A. Get Out OF Here With That!!!!!!!!!!!

Dallas are Houston don't care about preserving history because that holds up growth from little towns to big cities.You have people that care for history and wanted to stay and some that care for history but knowing it was there is just enough lol.


Maybe that is the reason Houston,Dallas and Austin are taking L.A,CHICAGO,PHILLY population.
People get sick of see the same thing thats what I like about Texas you never know what you are going to see new.

Good bye with the Dust and Hello to the New age cities Houston,Dallas,Austin bye bye Ice Age cities L.A.
Chicago,Nyc bye as for me!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top