Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which City is most Likely to be Destroyed by Natural Disaster, or Man-made Disaster
New York 14 12.73%
Los Angeles 43 39.09%
Chicago 2 1.82%
Houston 7 6.36%
Philadelphia 1 0.91%
Phoenix 6 5.45%
San Antonio 1 0.91%
San Diego 3 2.73%
Dallas 0 0%
San Jose 3 2.73%
Boston 0 0%
Fresno 2 1.82%
Oklahoma City 21 19.09%
Minneapolis 2 1.82%
New Orleans 34 30.91%
Tyler, Tx 3 2.73%
Denver 1 0.91%
San Francisco 32 29.09%
Las Vegas 3 2.73%
Hawaii 9 8.18%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Old East Dallas
297 posts, read 476,022 times
Reputation: 162

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ragnarkar View Post
I wouldn't underestimate the volcanos in the Pacific Northwest.. roughly as many people died in the Mt. St. Helens eruption in 1980 as did in the 1989 San Francisco earthquake.

Honolulu would probably be the most dangerous: volcano, earthquake, tsunami, and tropical storm threats.
I was a kid when Mt St Helens erupted.
Back then, I didn't understand why it was such a big deal.
Things on TV make things so .... detached.

But if it were to happen NOW, I'd be really afraid and sympathetic for
all the victims.

It was a really BIG deal, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:06 PM
 
28,661 posts, read 18,764,698 times
Reputation: 30933
Quote:
Originally Posted by ragnarkar View Post
Honolulu would probably be the most dangerous: volcano, earthquake, tsunami, and tropical storm threats.
Actually, for climatic reasons hurricanes are rare at that latitude and so far out to sea. Tsunamis tend to die out before they get that far as well. Volcanos and earthquakes are not a worry because the active volcano constantly oozes and shifts to relieve pressure. Tropical storms...meh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Old East Dallas
297 posts, read 476,022 times
Reputation: 162
Yeah, everyone keeps talking about L.A. and New Orleans for Hurricanes,
but what about cities that have like 10 Nuclear Reactors???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:43 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,182,626 times
Reputation: 11355
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkSide View Post
Earthquakes DO happen anywhere and Everywhere.
Just the other month, we had a few here in the DFW. Just small ones (2. somethings)

But they aren't reported or advertised by the media like in California.

Earthquakes , aftershocks, tremors are everywhere.
You're comparing small tremors to the threat of massive earthquakes. Massive earthquakes happen almost without fail at areas on the edges of plates. New Madrid and others are exceptions.

The threat of disasterous earthquakes in Dallas or Houston is almost NOTHING compared to the threats in Chile, Japan or California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 02:56 PM
 
6 posts, read 7,967 times
Reputation: 13
Watching all these disaster movies, I really believe San Fransisco and New York would have a major man made disaster. Just my two cents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
1,912 posts, read 2,087,543 times
Reputation: 4048
Why isn't Seattle or Portland included?

I selected all cities that are at high risk of earthquake, hurricane, extreme drought, or sea level rise. I didn't take into account tornadoes, as tornadoes cannot destroy an entire major city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Old East Dallas
297 posts, read 476,022 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by jennifat View Post
Why isn't Seattle or Portland included?

I selected all cities that are at high risk of earthquake, hurricane, extreme drought, or sea level rise. I didn't take into account tornadoes, as tornadoes cannot destroy an entire major city.
I looked on Wikipedia for the top 10 list of U.S. cities.
After that, I just threw in whatever came to mind.

Seriously, tho, Seattle and Portland should have made the list.
Gave u a rep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Old East Dallas
297 posts, read 476,022 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoadRunnerZ View Post
Watching all these disaster movies, I really believe San Fransisco and New York would have a major man made disaster. Just my two cents.
Being 2 of the most populous cities on either side of the country,that makes sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,288 posts, read 7,492,947 times
Reputation: 5061
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkSide View Post
Who? Well, Houston (and yourself) would.

I don't want to derail this thread by pointing out who is a hater...
so I'll leave it at that.
LOL You will leave it at "that", because "that"( a weak accusation), is all you have. You are the one who implied that Houston was a nuclear target beyond what other major cities on your list would be. Wishful thinking on your part to be sure..

BTW why would you include Tyler Texas on that list ?

Last edited by Jack Lance; 05-13-2014 at 06:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2014, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
5,003 posts, read 5,973,386 times
Reputation: 4323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lance View Post
BTW why would you include Tyler Texas on that list ?
And "Hawaii" isn't a city either. Or even an island. haha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top