Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: 900k to 1.5 Million Metro's People Know The Least About?
Jacksonville 14 7.04%
Louisville 15 7.54%
Hartford 20 10.05%
Raleigh 7 3.52%
Rochester 33 16.58%
Grand Rapids 67 33.67%
Tucson 18 9.05%
Tulsa 30 15.08%
Fresno 44 22.11%
Bridgeport 58 29.15%
Worcester 90 45.23%
Other (Memphis/OKC/Richmond/New Orleans/Salt Lake/Birmingham/Buffalo/Honolulu/ABQ) 21 10.55%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 199. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2014, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,639 posts, read 16,019,500 times
Reputation: 5286

Advertisements

Not more than 3 votes please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2014, 09:45 AM
 
Location: in here, out there
3,062 posts, read 7,030,601 times
Reputation: 5109
Probably apostrophes and syntax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,816 posts, read 21,993,461 times
Reputation: 14124
I voted for 4. Didn't read the criteria beforehand. So shoot me.

I picked Worcester, Rochester, Louisville, and Grand Rapids. Worcester I know, but I don't think many people do. I don't think it's "overlooked" or "underrated." I think it's really more of a satellite city to Boston. One of three major satellite cities to be specific (along with Manchester to the North and Providence to the South). As far as New England cities go, it's sort of "meh." It's not a bad place, but it doesn't have the size of Boston, the charm of a city like Portland, or the level of amenities that similarly sized Providence has.

Rochester is New York's second most important Great Lake city. I don't really know anything about it other than that.

Grand Rapids is another one I really know very little about.

Louisville obviously has a major university and I've heard great things from those who have visited and it's a city that intrigues me.

Fresno almost got a vote, but I've been there (very briefly). A friend of mine in the Marine's who was stationed in Lemoore suggested a few restaurants in Fresno. We swung through on the way to Yosemite and some food and a beer at Silver Dollar. I also have a shirt from a long time ago that says, "Fresno? Fres YES!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,924,934 times
Reputation: 8365
^Hahaha, I want that Fresno t-shirt!

Last edited by JMT; 05-23-2014 at 03:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,293 posts, read 6,054,135 times
Reputation: 9623
Grand Rapids - A lot going on there. $2billion in investment over the last 10 years and counting Almost a complete transformation from 20/30 years ago. Under 5% unemployment, with rapidly developing social scenes in Microbreweries, Art, and Food/Entertainment. I think it gets overlooked because of the seemingly small city population. It's 44sq miles which is smaller than quite a bit of its peer cities. Also because it being in Michigan people often lump all Michigan cities under the Michigan stereotype which sticks with it no matter how much it improves.

I did my homework on this one.

Being a Louisville homer I think It gets a decent amount of press, perhaps it's a little under-rated but we tend to see more notariety than the other cities on that list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 10:31 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,447,987 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrfox View Post
I voted for 4. Didn't read the criteria beforehand. So shoot me.

I picked Worcester, Rochester, Louisville, and Grand Rapids. Worcester I know, but I don't think many people do. I don't think it's "overlooked" or "underrated." I think it's really more of a satellite city to Boston. One of three major satellite cities to be specific (along with Manchester to the North and Providence to the South). As far as New England cities go, it's sort of "meh." It's not a bad place, but it doesn't have the size of Boston, the charm of a city like Portland, or the level of amenities that similarly sized Providence has.
The Worcester Metro doesn't have 900,000 people. MSA population is 800,000 people and that's generous, it includes all of Worcester County. So, small towns and rural areas well outside Worcester, particularly the northern part of the county. The urban area population is a bit more reasonable, 462,000. It's probably still poorly unknown for a place with 1/2 million people probably because it's overshadowed by Boston and near so many other cities. Similar sized urban areas include Toledo, OH, Witchita, KS and Knoxville, TN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 10:48 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,888,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Allentown PA almost gets there at just shy of 900K
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,639 posts, read 16,019,500 times
Reputation: 5286
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
The Worcester Metro doesn't have 900,000 people. MSA population is 800,000 people and that's generous
Wikipedia has been saying for 2 years that it's 923,672.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 10:58 AM
 
93,166 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
I picked Rochester, Grand Rapids and Worcester.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2014, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,816 posts, read 21,993,461 times
Reputation: 14124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
Wikipedia has been saying for 2 years that it's 923,672.
Maybe it does, but nei is right. According to the Census Bureau (the agency that defines MSAs), The Worcester MSA is simply the entirety of Worcester County, MA. Worcester County has a population of 798,552 (2013 estimate is 809,106). That would make the Worcester MSA's population about 800,000.

Sources:
Census Bureau definition of Metropolitan Statistical Areas.

Worcester County Population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top