U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you prefer New York City or the Los Angeles area?
New York City 129 70.49%
Los Angeles 54 29.51%
Voters: 183. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2008, 01:50 PM
 
Location: NYC
278 posts, read 1,086,806 times
Reputation: 89

Advertisements

I'm wondering which one you guys like best. Do you prefer New York City or the Los Angeles area? List reasons why you like which city you picked and why you don't like the city you didn't pick. Picking neither is not a option.

 
Old 01-09-2008, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Arizona
307 posts, read 1,287,020 times
Reputation: 126
New York City, it just seems that you can make anything out New York. New York City is extremely diverse of course. Mexico City is the largest city in North America. New York City is the largest city in the United States. About 8 million more people live in Mexico City. New York City, however, is probably a much more important city because it contains much more economic, cultural, and international power. (It is the seat of the United Nations) So I would say New York City is the "lmost important city" in North America or South America.

I like the New York scene much more because you can make anything out of the city. Each section of city looks different from the next. You can choose to love it or hate. You will never be bored. People are much more calm then Los Angeles. I noticed that the "L.A scene" guys act like they are all hardcore and the girls are prissy.

New Yorkers seem much more down-to-earth.

Not to mention New York City crime is lower then L.A crime. People in New York City tend to be more social that South California.
Two VERY different cities so it hard to compare.

Of course that is what i've noticed. So different opinions will form .

So in conclusion. I find New York City much more interesting.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 02:15 PM
 
Location: La Habra, CA
167 posts, read 154,513 times
Reputation: 27
Not really a fan of both, but I would say LA since I live here and I'm already used to it. New York's nice to visit, but too expensive and too crowded.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 02:20 PM
 
Location: ITP
2,133 posts, read 5,492,598 times
Reputation: 1333
If NYC had LA's climate, then you would have probably the best city in the world.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Phoenix metro
20,005 posts, read 67,950,554 times
Reputation: 10048
Im glad it doesnt have L.A.'s climate.

Id also go with NYC. Its just more of a city, which is what Im looking for. L.A. is too suburban-y for my tastes.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 03:31 PM
 
625 posts, read 1,929,955 times
Reputation: 425
New York. There's just so much going on here, it's exciting to be in the middle of it. LA is, as I constantly say, too superficial and, as far as I'm concerned, not as exciting.

Plus, I love the subway.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 03:38 PM
 
2,248 posts, read 6,038,222 times
Reputation: 2062
Probably Los Angeles by a hair.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Arizona
307 posts, read 1,287,020 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by oc2eire View Post
New York's nice to visit, but too expensive

L.A is overall more expensive then NYC. Excluding Manhattan.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 06:00 PM
 
Location: SoFlo to SoCal (Hacienda Heights)
1,510 posts, read 4,575,569 times
Reputation: 659
Quote:
If NYC had LA's climate, then you would have probably the best city in the world.
Agreed.


Los Angeles is my choice. I think New York is incredible, and its fun to visit and I love its urbanity (is that a word??), but I dont think I'd see myself living there. Los Angeles feels more like home.
 
Old 01-09-2008, 07:09 PM
 
5,619 posts, read 13,301,589 times
Reputation: 2880
Can we please stop with these!!! How many NYC vs. LA threads are going to start? A new one starts every day.

And for all of you that say LA is too suburban, take out Manhattan and what do you have?...extremely low density housing. Greater LA is the most densely populated metropolitan area in America.

From Wiki:
Los Angeles has a long-standing reputation for sprawl; however, this reputation is undeserved. As of the 2000 Census, The "Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana" Urbanized Area had a population density of 7,068 people per square mile (2,730/kmē), covering 1,668 square miles (4,320 kmē) of land area, making it the most densely-populated Urbanized Area (as defined by the United States Census Bureau) in the United States.[6] For comparison, the "New York-Newark" Urbanized Area as a whole had a population density of 5,309 people per square mile, covering 3,353 square miles (8,684 kmē) of land area.

Neither city is better. They both appeal to different people and their lifestyles. For me it's LA, but apparently the majority of people on here prefer NYC, which is fine with me. JUST PLEASE STOP THESE THREADS!!! THEY ARE SO ANNOYING!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

Đ 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top