Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2015, 07:45 PM
 
Location: The Dirty South.
1,624 posts, read 2,034,839 times
Reputation: 1241

Advertisements

I think a better thread would be Chicago native food vs philly native food.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2015, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfoe View Post
I think a better thread would be Chicago native food vs philly native food.
I already did that.

Chicago cuisine vs. Philadelphia cuisine: Which do you prefer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,734,937 times
Reputation: 4081
Isn't the effectiveness of using the city hall method for measuring population dependent on where city hall is located in a city? What if city hall isn't in the middle of downtown? What if it's barely downtown at all? Isn't it better to measure from the middle of downtown?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:15 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
Isn't the effectiveness of using the city hall method for measuring population dependent on where city hall is located in a city? What if city hall isn't in the middle of downtown? Isn't it better to measure from the middle of downtown?
Where city hall is located is irrelevant to this thread topic.

Quote:
What if it's barely downtown at all?
huh?

Quote:
Isn't it better to measure from the middle of downtown?
Not really
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:23 PM
 
2,808 posts, read 2,277,721 times
Reputation: 3714
It would be interesting to see the central contiguous 6-8 sq-miles of peer cities: Bos, SF, Chi, and maybe LA. This 2nd largest downtown designation seems to suffer from somewhat arbitrary construction.

The majority of this "downtown Philly" definition is composed of quiet, tightly packed 2/3 story rowhouses. Vine to South Street seems like a more reasonable definition for "downtown Philly" based on a typical downtown environment.

Philly 8 sq miles is probably a little bigger than Boston, given that Philly holds it's density better. Maybe even higher than Chicago (for now) given the big underdeveloped areas that suround greater downtown Chicago. But, I find it highly unlikely that Philly's 8 sq miles is denser than SF's, given SFs cohesive density and vast tracts of 5-7 story walk up apartments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:29 PM
 
1,353 posts, read 1,641,878 times
Reputation: 817
This is hard to imagine with all of Chicago's restored lofts and 50-60-70-80-90+ story residential towers. 2 miles from city hall is also pretty generous. In Chicago's case, in 0.5 miles going East you hit a lake, so there's one limit. Also, the scope of Chicago's downtown is soooo much larger than Philly's. In the one case, with what is left over as land within that 2 mile radius of Chicago City Hall, that is mostly legitimately "downtown" if you will for all intents and purposes. Also want to point out that there is 3x as much office space and I don't know how much more retail in that radius in Chicago, not to mention institutional uses. Being the bigger city.

In Philadelphia's case, a 2 mile radius includes East Passyunk, Bella Vista, and other South Philly neighborhoods (not to speak of their lesser equivalents north of CC). Would anyone legitimately claim they live "downtown" if they live in Bella Vista or Kensington or Passyunk, etc etc? I'd say, in residential terms, a neighborhood like Rittenhouse is certainly downtown, but Philly has a much smaller downtown than Chicago so what's actually "downtown" is likely just an adjacent neighborhood that you can walk to downtown from within 15-30 minutes. It'd be like calling South Boston "downtown" or Pacific Heights in San Francisco "downtown" (heck you'd be hard pressed to get any folks in Nob Hill, Russian Hill, or North Beach to say they live "downtown" even though many probably walk 10-25 minutes to work downtown).

Finally, by nearly any metric, according to this report, Center City Philly is not as large as NYC - Midtown, NYC - Downtown, Chicago, DC, San Francisco, or Boston. According to this report, there are 11,210 hotel rooms in Center City. Compare that to the 40,000 in DT Chicago or the 25,000+ in downtown San Francisco (33,000 in SF overall), 29,000 in DC, and 22,000 in Boston + Cambridge. According to this report, there is 43 million sf office space between CC and University City. Using same source (Cushman & Wakefield), compare that to 65.3 million sf in Boston before Cambridge, 75.4 million sf in San Francisco, 107.5 million sf in DC, and 126.2 million sf in Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:31 PM
 
1,353 posts, read 1,641,878 times
Reputation: 817
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Where city hall is located is irrelevant to this thread topic.


huh?


Not really

It does matter. There are plenty of cities with city halls not located in, or even near the center of the central business district. I do think the report does try to remedy that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766
It's quite funny to see people make excuses. Look, we all know Chicago is a great city but you gotta give credit to Philly on this one. Center City has improved so dramatically over the last 20 years. It was inevitable that it was going to surpass downtown Chicago in population. It was only a matter of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:44 PM
 
2,598 posts, read 4,922,150 times
Reputation: 2275
Chicago has a lake...tell me that doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2015, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,736 posts, read 5,508,099 times
Reputation: 5978
Haters goin' hate lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top