Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2015, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Toronto, Canada
2,618 posts, read 1,504,285 times
Reputation: 5425

Advertisements

Methodology

We ranked all 421 current metropolitan statistical areas based on employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2003 through 2014. Rankings are based on recent growth trends, mid-term growth, long-term growth and the region’s momentum. We also broke down rankings by size since regional economies differ markedly due to their scale.

1. San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA 1.034 million jobs
2. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 1.032 million jobs
3. Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX 2.346 million jobs
4. Austin-Round Rock, TX 925 million jobs
5. Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin,TN 892 million jobs
6. Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 2.974 million jobs
7. Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 1,364 million jobs
8. Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 1.14 million jobs
9. Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC 1.085 million jobs
10. San Antonia-New Braunfels, TX 960 million jobs.

The Best Cities For Jobs 2015 - Forbes for reference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2015, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Putnam County TN
730 posts, read 815,463 times
Reputation: 3112
Quote:
Originally Posted by theterribleone View Post
Methodology

We ranked all 421 current metropolitan statistical areas based on employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2003 through 2014. Rankings are based on recent growth trends, mid-term growth, long-term growth and the region’s momentum. We also broke down rankings by size since regional economies differ markedly due to their scale.

1. San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco, CA 1.034 million jobs
2. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 1.032 million jobs
3. Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX 2.346 million jobs
4. Austin-Round Rock, TX 925 million jobs
5. Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin,TN 892 million jobs
6. Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 2.974 million jobs
7. Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO 1,364 million jobs
8. Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 1.14 million jobs
9. Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC 1.085 million jobs
10. San Antonia-New Braunfels, TX 960 million jobs.

The Best Cities For Jobs 2015 - Forbes for reference.
Whoa, so pretty much the rest of the planet can find work in Austin, Nashville, Denver, and San Antonio. That's 4,141 million (or 4.141 billion) jobs between those four cities. Impressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 09:54 AM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,135,673 times
Reputation: 6338
All in the south and west. I still don't like Houston being up there since it's experiencing a job loss at the moment, but since they said 2003-2014, it's whatever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 09:56 AM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,135,673 times
Reputation: 6338
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuffaloHome View Post
Whoa, so pretty much the rest of the planet can find work in Austin, Nashville, Denver, and San Antonio. That's 4,141 million (or 4.141 billion) jobs between those four cities. Impressive.
It's four million jobs...don't know what you're getting at. You can see the decimal points which indicates significant numbers. It's not 4,000 million. It's 4.0 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 09:57 AM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,948,981 times
Reputation: 27279
Why would they do 2003-2014? The recession introduces quite a bit of statistical noise here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Michigan
4,647 posts, read 8,599,691 times
Reputation: 3776
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuffaloHome View Post
Whoa, so pretty much the rest of the planet can find work in Austin, Nashville, Denver, and San Antonio. That's 4,141 million (or 4.141 billion) jobs between those four cities. Impressive.
Those Forbes guys have surprisingly good math for being a magazine about numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,540,106 times
Reputation: 12152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
All in the south and west. I still don't like Houston being up there since it's experiencing a job loss at the moment, but since they said 2003-2014, it's whatever.
It's not like what happened in the past year should offset what has happened in the past decade in Houston. Not to mention that Houston is in far better shape to handle it as opposed to the 80s. Houston is rightfully on this list and could have a bounce back now that Oil is going back up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Putnam County TN
730 posts, read 815,463 times
Reputation: 3112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
It's four million jobs...don't know what you're getting at. You can see the decimal points which indicates significant numbers. It's not 4,000 million. It's 4.0 million.
Nope. The decimal points are not there. They're not in the first post, and they're not at the Forbes site. Just do a cut-and-paste from that obnoxious Forbes slide show and you'll see that there are no decimal points before the numbers for Austin, Nashville, and San Antonio, and Forbes put a comma instead of a decimal in the number for Denver.

And of course I know it's not 4 billion jobs. I was being tongue in cheek. Good Lord.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Midwest
4,666 posts, read 5,092,524 times
Reputation: 6829
This is lazy journalism...instead of quantity they should be looking at quality i.e. total compensation, and comparing compensation to the cost of living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2015, 11:39 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,743,952 times
Reputation: 17398
25,000 jobs that pay $70,000 per year = 50,000 jobs that pay $35,000 per year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top