U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most prestigious
Los Angeles 114 44.36%
Chicago 39 15.18%
Washington, DC 44 17.12%
San Francisco 60 23.35%
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-11-2015, 08:20 PM
 
Location: CA, NC, and currently FL
366 posts, read 274,334 times
Reputation: 168

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
He's just rehashing the same stats he uses in EVERY thread that pertains to SF. Doesn't matter if they're relevant to the topic at hand, or even outright trumped (looking at you, NYC vs SF thread), he'll fall back on his bread and butters, ignore/dismiss valid counterarguments (digging that private jet set map posted), and rile up the opposition with puerile, asinine comments/hashtags. Rinse and repeat. How this still gets to people is beyond me. Just keep posting SFs poop map, throw in a stupid hash tag somewhere, and talk up LAs brand ranking if you want to play his game

Anyway, the correct answer is DC, before this thread devolved into a California pissing match. Nothing posted has dissuaded my opinion on this, and I don't view this poll as accurate in the slightest. If MDAllstar or another DC poster was as vigilant as Monty, I'm sure endless stats about embassies and the like would begin to persuade people to reality.
Thank god they are not...

I'm quite glad DC posters are above that, if they ever wanna be taken seriously by any respectable people that's the right approach.

It's quite pitiful really with these California posters. They go on and on with this type of ridiculously silly arguments with all the bashing and sausage measuring contests, thinking they will "win" or something as long as they have the last word. How juvenile and sad really. All this stuff is doing is showing how insecure they really are.

 
Old 11-11-2015, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Zurich, Switzerland/ Piedmont, CA
31,583 posts, read 53,140,492 times
Reputation: 14504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Estudiamos View Post
You resent this map because you have no response to it LOL
No, actually it's you who resents the fact that no one is impressed. Yawns.

Top 10 Cities by the number of Residents With a Net Worth of $30 Million+, 2014
New York 8,655
London 6,815
Tokyo 6,185
San Francisco 5,460
Los Angeles 5,135
Osaka 3,405
Paris 3,345
Hong Kong 3,335
Chicago 2,885
Mexico City 2,780



WOW@SF
 
Old 11-11-2015, 08:35 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 902,886 times
Reputation: 324
The same stuff over and over.
I'm actually feeling sorry for you now
 
Old 11-11-2015, 08:52 PM
 
Location: Zurich, Switzerland/ Piedmont, CA
31,583 posts, read 53,140,492 times
Reputation: 14504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
The same stuff over and over.
Exactly. The same vague 'celebrities therefore its LA' gibberish and a map of moving jets now shown 4 times.

As usual, you guys are comparing your little breadcrumbs to a a subastantially better off area that is far more sophisticated and posh.

Im still waiting for an explanation for this shameful stat:

Median Family Income with Children Under 18 Years of Age, 2014:
San Francisco-Oakland Urban Area $100,842
Los Angeles City $45,096

Similarly sized and populated geographies that are world's apart as far as prosperity and quality of life.

#PrayForLA
 
Old 11-11-2015, 08:56 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 902,886 times
Reputation: 324
Seen it many times from you.
Same stuff over and over.

What a false ego you have.
 
Old 11-11-2015, 09:09 PM
 
Location: LA
18 posts, read 8,411 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
Seen it many times from you.
Same stuff over and over.

What a false ego you have.
He had no response to the museums, musicians, actors, symphony orchestras, architecture, theaters, Emmys, Grammys, Oscars, landmarks, etc.

He's waived the white flag
 
Old 11-11-2015, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Zurich, Switzerland/ Piedmont, CA
31,583 posts, read 53,140,492 times
Reputation: 14504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
Seen it many times from you.
Same stuff over and over.
And it goes totally unchallenged.

Quote:
What a false ego you have.
Indeed.

Median Family Income with Children Under 18 Years of Age, 2014:
San Francisco-Oakland Urban Area $100,842
Los Angeles City $45,096

If the SF Urban Area and LA City switched places, the LA Area would actually much better off, but the Bay Area would be much worse off.
 
Old 11-11-2015, 09:17 PM
 
Location: MPLS/CHI
553 posts, read 446,892 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
And it goes totally unchallenged.



Indeed.

Median Family Income with Children Under 18 Years of Age, 2014:
San Francisco-Oakland Urban Area $100,842
Los Angeles City $45,096

If the SF Urban Area and LA City switched places, the LA Area would actually much better off, but the Bay Area would be much worse off.
Those wealth-x stats are for the entire Bay Area and not just San Francisco by the way. LA has an many rich people as the Bay but it has way more working class people. LA is sort of top heavy.
 
Old 11-11-2015, 09:18 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 902,886 times
Reputation: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
And it goes totally unchallenged.



Indeed.

Median Family Income with Children Under 18 Years of Age, 2014:
San Francisco-Oakland Urban Area $100,842
Los Angeles City $45,096

If the SF Urban Area and LA City switched places, the LA Area would actually much better off, but the Bay Area would be much worse off.
Which is why I feel sorry for you. It's unchallenged cause I'm bored with you.


Same ole same ole

Everyone else knows
 
Old 11-11-2015, 09:22 PM
 
Location: LA
18 posts, read 8,411 times
Reputation: 10
LAs in the most stimulating cities in the world

Los Angeles and New York City are in a constant battle over which can attract the world’s best artists. At the moment, it seems that LA is winning.

LA has slightly more than 56 art establishments for every 100,000 residents. Of course, LA also has a lot of tourism, which makes it possible for artists of all types of paintings, statues, performances, and other creative works to a larger audience.

The Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) also plays an important part of stimulating the imaginations of artists in LA. It constantly features works from some of the most innovative living artists. Of course, art masters who have passed away also get a chance to display work posthumously.



Read more at 6 Most Stimulating Cities in the World for Creative Minds

18montclpwned
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top