Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What are the flashiest cities in America?
New York 32 27.83%
Los Angeles 45 39.13%
Chicago 4 3.48%
Miami 51 44.35%
Atlanta 15 13.04%
Dallas 25 21.74%
Houston 2 1.74%
San Francisco 11 9.57%
Boston 0 0%
Washington 4 3.48%
Phoenix 1 0.87%
Vegas 39 33.91%
Other 3 2.61%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2015, 06:45 AM
 
Location: MPLS/CHI
574 posts, read 689,248 times
Reputation: 427

Advertisements

My guess here would be LA, Miami, and Atlanta. NYC is luxurious, but not the flashiest. Cities like NYC, SF, and Chicago seem to have more sophisticated people with money rather than flashy, although they do have their fair share of flashiness and the other cities have their fair share of sophistication.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2015, 01:16 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,343,170 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonelitist View Post
For the amount of wealth in the area, the Bay Area as a whole and San Francisco in particular are about the least flashy metros/cities in the country. Not sure where you come up with this notion, but it sounds like a daily perpetuated soundbite about the region (yes, new wealth is coming in, but no, the "poor" immigrant communities aren't really going anywhere...and to be frank, sometimes it's these immigrant communities that are flashiest - look at South FL!, or even the Persian and Indian communities of the Bay Area like Fremont!). Even a wealthy suburb like Atherton is far less flashy than its counterparts in SoCal or the South. The whole area, even new money parts, have a sort of "old money" vibe when it comes to flaunting wealth or designing your home (a "mansion" in wealthy suburbs such as that are about half the size or less as areas with even less money in other parts of the US...basically anything > 3-4,000 sf in the Bay Area is a full on mansion and nobody wants publicity about where/what they buy, and hardly anyone drives a very fancy car...a Tesla is about as fancy as it gets, and it's green, which is more important to uber wealthy Bay Area residents than having a 6 car garage filled with 'Raris). Also, it's a waterfront city, but no yachts, even though there are more people in the area that could afford one than just about anywhere else. Just go to the Rosewood SandHill on a Thursday night for the biggest "scene" in NorCal. If you are used to scenes in SoCal or South FL or Atlanta, you'd die. NorCal is richer than god, but doesn't know how to exude "I'm rich" at all, nor do I think the vibe/mentality promotes that. Brains go much further up north than looks or popularity.

Anyway, just to dispel this notion, for better or worse.


Otherwise I fully agree with you: new money sunbelt cities are often the flashiest - Miami, Atlanta, Dallas, and SoCal.
Oh don't get me wrong, SF is WAY behind LA, Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas in flashiness. But generally on this thread, metros are taken into consideration also. In SF, the trust fund babies in the Marina and some of the newer tech bros can be flashy. Again, not to a Beverly Hills level. But it does exist. However, the areas around Los Gatos, Saratoga, Campbell, and spreading into a few nearby areas can be just like Beverly Hills. The East Bay areas of Pleasanton to Walnut Creek can be very similar. Because it's impossible to talk about LA being flashy when not including places like Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, San Marino, Palos Verdes, Calabasas, etc. which aren't actually part of LA. Same with Miami Beach to Miami.

Parts of Marin County definitely are loaded as well, but they keep it somewhat classier with their money. They might have a sailboat, but nothing OVERLY flashy.

Again, SF is far behind. Just wanted to mention it can be found since SF is so low on the polls (for good reason) and a lot of people that haven't lived in the Bay Area don't know much outside the city limits and possibly Oakland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 01:21 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,343,170 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
How so? Couldn't the same be said of L.A.and Miami? How is the 2nd richest metro on Earth, which is chock full of billionaires, millionaires and models dying to be seen, not in the running for flashiest? I personally voted Miami due to the Latino/beach/pastel vanity vibe prevalent down there, but NYC is pretty flashy too. From gaudy skyscrapers and apartments to rims in the hood to Yeezys on the subway, New Yorkers love to flaunt wealth.
No it's definitely more ubiquitous in LA and Miami. It's hard to explain, but the vibe of "flashy" doesn't really exist much outside Manhattan. While walking through Manhattan, only a few neighborhoods are the level of huge parts of LA and Miami. I'm talking women walking around with bags with labels all over them, flashy earrings, perfectly new shoes, expensive car. Yeah they have expensive real estate. But I think the NYC vibe keeps the flashiness down. In LA, your shoes don't get ruined as quickly as NYC because you don't walk everywhere. You don't have to worry about pickpockets on a subway. Someone isn't going to reach into your Lambo or Rari and take your gold plated iPad, expensive leather wallet, and your wife's expensive earrings. So in that sense, I think the street life, urbanity, and human contact of NYC plays a part in it. The uber rich in NYC have the same things. But for just regular wealthy or even the keeping up with the Jones' of the middle class, LA and Miami are much flashier overall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 01:29 PM
 
1,353 posts, read 1,643,598 times
Reputation: 817
^^^fair point, but it's not like it's LA/Miami/Atlanta and then SF and then everybody else. SF and really the whole Bay Area are still in whatever pack of cities/places is literally least flashy in this country. And that even includes some of the SV communities.

Also keep in mind there are few places if any on this earth with the kind of sheer wealth that whole parts of the Bay Area have, so one would think that of all places the Bay Area would be super flashy, but it's not.

You see *a lot* of Teslas driving around. ~$100K car. Ok, so clearly you're wealthy. But you could probably afford a 5% ownership stake in Ferrari the company and all you have is a Tesla. This is a different case than Tesla being in the same class of Ferrari in other, less wealthy cities where if you drive one you're in the same league of people who drive a Ferrari around, and maybe you're stretching to be able to afford one, and now you're the "cool" person on the block who has one. So perspective is warranted.

Also, Marina Bros wear nice watches. They all grew up with a silver spoon and went to Princeton. But they still live in an un-air-conditioned crap/cramped apartment somewhere in SF and may or may not even have a car and take a bus in to work. The same crowd in Atlanta all own expensive *flashy* floor to ceiling glass condos, drive new BMWs, and wear the same watches, but they went to UGA.

Again, perspective, but I hear ya.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 01:50 PM
 
7,108 posts, read 8,966,855 times
Reputation: 6415
Atlanta and Dallas definitely have a flash with no cash vibe to them. Atlanta has a lot of jealousy mixed in as well.

Memphis has the poor mans flash with no cash vibe too. Just look at all the luxury cars and talk the drivers and you'll discover they are barely working part time. When I visited a mall outside of Nashville in the Brentwood area, I got snobbed quite a few times but I didn't see it consistent throughout the area but noticed quite a few luxury cars throughout the city.

New York, Boston and San Francisco are more sophisticated than flashy.

Chicago isn't flashy but a few areas have attitude. I had friends who where millionaires and I didn't know it until after a few years of knowing them. That seems to be a common trait in that city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Nashville TN
4,918 posts, read 6,467,718 times
Reputation: 4778
Miami Beach and Vegas but its mostly the mindset of rich international and domestic billionaires and millionaires so use those cities as their personal playground. LA is flashy only on the West Side and because of the Hollywood mindset, the rest of LA is working class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX and wherever planes fly
1,907 posts, read 3,228,788 times
Reputation: 2129
Add Washington DC to this list. Very Very pretentious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 03:30 PM
 
5,673 posts, read 7,450,763 times
Reputation: 2740
Las Vegas>Dallas>Atlanta>Miami....in that order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 03:35 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
5,287 posts, read 5,786,880 times
Reputation: 4474
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasboi View Post
Las Vegas>Dallas>Atlanta>Miami....in that order.
Instead of telling you that you're flat out wrong, I'd be interested in hearing why you think Atlanta and Dallas are somehow flashier than Miami.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2015, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles,CA & Scottsdale, AZ
1,932 posts, read 2,471,404 times
Reputation: 1843
Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
Really? Outside of Los Angeles, the West Coast doesn't really have a flashy mindset at all. And hello, Miami, the obvious winner of this thread, is on the East Coast. To say nothing of Black Atlanta or NYC. And Vegas is flashy, but not sure it's residential flashy or just corporate flashy...
I don't think you are correct. Having grown up in Scottsdale and living in LA and Scottsdale most of my life I was surrounded by flashiness that you would not believe(way more than anything I experienced in North VA/DC. Outside of LA it is still really flashy out here. Orange County, Las Vegas, Scottsdale for the PHX area, and the north suburbs of San Diego all are pretty flashy in my opinion. I don't think of the east coast as really flashy. In terms of flashiness though I think it goes-
Miami
Las Vegas
LA
Atlanta
Dallas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top