Is San Francisco more prominent then Chicago and LA? (America, Los Angeles, people)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
San Francisco, then and now | US news | The Guardian
Everywhere the past 5 or 6 years, SF has come up. People talk about it more regarding everything. It seems like it dominates the popular culture and has an increasing global presence from what it had already. With NYC seeming like yesterday's new, LA out economically and Chicago suffering from violence bad press and finance problems has San Francisco becoming the number two city in america?
Last edited by theterribleone; 02-04-2016 at 09:24 PM..
As far as number 2 tho, the Bay Area makes a compelling case as far as prestige on the world stage.
In what way? You could mayyyybe make the argument with Chicago (still don't buy it), but Los Angeles still has a huge amount of cultural importance (entertainment) that makes it very prominent.
And don't forget about the political influence of Washington. I think Washington is very easily more prominent than the Bay Area on a global scale.
In what way? You could mayyyybe make the argument with Chicago (still don't buy it), but Los Angeles still has a huge amount of cultural importance (entertainment) that makes it very prominent.
And don't forget about the political influence of Washington. I think Washington is very easily more prominent than the Bay Area on a global scale.
Agreed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.