Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You have to realize everything he said is true. DC compared to Chicago is richer, more cosmopolitan, and more educated. Boston is richer and more educated, less international but safer than Chicago
I have noticed that you pollute multiple threads with trolling. You take offense when anyone points out facts verified by govt. statistics.
It's 100% fact that DC and Boston are much richer, better educated, and have much better economies than Chicago.
Chicago is a declining Rust Belt city. It's comparable to other declining Rust Belt centers, which is proven in the Census population results, and the BSA economic results.
Chicago has the second worst population losses in the nation, and fourth worst job losses in the nation. That's why much of the city is a declining ghetto.
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,517,350 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4
what does DC/ Boston have o do with this thread?
after making a new account, dementor gets confused as to which thread he is bashing Chicago in. Often, he will forget which cities are being discussed. He most likely was trying to think of something to say about Chicago in the Boston vs. DC thread, and accidentally expressed those thoughts in his response on this thread.
This is just the new reincarnation of the original chicago bashing troll, 'dementor'
you just haven't been around long enough, but you'll soon get the gist
Interesting. I thought you were referring to me as this 'dementor' since I was the one who brought DC and Boston into discussion in this thread being as they may the only two of three cities I have ever lived in to compare what I know of Chicago. Post 303, last paragraph
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,517,350 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyman11
Interesting. I thought you were referring to me as this 'dementor' since I was the one who brought DC and Boston into discussion in this thread being as they may the only two of three cities I have ever lived in to compare what I know of Chicago. Post 303, last paragraph
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,517,350 times
Reputation: 3107
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTN100
IMO, it's the Chicago boosters who are trolling this thread. The Census is a reputable source, but whenever someone cites the Census, the response is "Aha! Troll"!
oh really? from what i understand, this thread is supposed to be about which city people feel is more fast paced... it seems to me that these so called "Chicago boosters" would not be the ones to bring up census data about Chicago's "population loss" and make the thread go off topic. Seems to me that Chicago bashing trolls like yourself would. Make sense?
You're talking out of your a** at this point, I"m yet to hear a Chicagoan "boast" about corruption, don't get me started on NYC corruption, over a 100 years in the making.
"Vote early vote often"; "Welcome to Chicago"; "That's the Chicago way'';...it's part of the culture...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
