Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-24-2014, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7,736 posts, read 5,513,631 times
Reputation: 5978

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyB View Post
Something is wrong with your list. Boston has less than 650,000 people. There aren't even close to 12 million in the whole state.
I think he meant, population density per sq mile for each of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2014, 12:22 PM
 
Location: wausau, wisconsin
261 posts, read 266,576 times
Reputation: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyB View Post
Something is wrong with your list. Boston has less than 650,000 people. There aren't even close to 12 million in the whole state.
its the population of people per square mile not the population of the city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Nashville TN
4,918 posts, read 6,467,051 times
Reputation: 4778
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyB View Post
Something is wrong with your list. Boston has less than 650,000 people. There aren't even close to 12 million in the whole state.
Boston has only 650k people in the city proper but like 5 million or 6 million in Boston metro. The traffic was horrrrrrible if you ever had to get to RI, CT, NH or even from like Wellesley to the North Shore. Boston seems really dense and over populated it seemed like way more than 650k and then you have all the college aged kids that move here from all over the world. Boston still is a really urban dense over populated Metro area
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 12:28 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,463,557 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKWildcat1981 View Post
Boston has only 650k people in the city proper but like 5 million or 6 million in Boston metro. The traffic was horrrrrrible if you ever had to get to RI, CT, NH or even from like Wellesley to the North Shore. Boston seems really dense and over populated it seemed like way more than 650k and then you have all the college aged kids that move here from all over the world. Boston still is a really urban dense over populated Metro area
Outside of the SR-128/I-95 Boston doesn't feel dense at all, those outside barely feel like they add to the size of the city. It always felt not that big but dense (in the center) to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,462 posts, read 5,706,736 times
Reputation: 6093
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
Actually, the Ku Area has a population of 8.5 million, spread over 240 sq miles. That comes out to around 35,000ppsm. Brooklyn-level density.

Outside of peak census tracts, Tokyo is significantly denser overall. Unless you think 35,000ppsm is somehow lower than 27,000. .
Keep in mind that the area you carved out for Tokyo doesn't include any parks (besides the Imperial Palace and a couple of minor parks). And the NYC area you're comparing to consists of like 1/4 of uninhabitable parkland. In reality, like I mentioned before, outside the Yamanote loop Tokyo feels like Queens at street level. And even inside the loop Tokyo doesn't have long stretches of urbanity like Manhattan, its more like separate hubs around train stations. Literally 3 blocks away from Shibuya it gets pretty dead as far as pedestrian activity, especially when you compare it to Manhattan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 01:47 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 1,950,312 times
Reputation: 1001
Quote:
Originally Posted by tspoon91 View Post
This isnt a debate... This is an actual statistic...research the most densely populated cities.. It goes like this...
  1. New York, N.Y.: 27,012.4
  2. San Francisco, Calif.: 17,179.2
  3. Boston, Mass.: 12,792.7
  4. Chicago, Ill.: 11,841.8
  5. Philadelphia, Pa.: 11,379.5
Density stats are useless if we are not measuring equal sized land areas. How is it that this is not understood by so many here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 01:51 PM
 
2,829 posts, read 3,173,099 times
Reputation: 2266
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
Density stats are useless if we are not measuring equal sized land areas. How is it that this is not understood by so many here?
Umm, I do believe those numbers are per square mile, aka equal sized land mass (1 square mile)...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 01:55 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,906,553 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonkid123 View Post
Umm, I do believe those numbers are per square mile, aka equal sized land mass (1 square mile)...
but not an equal footprint

comparing an area that covers 49 sq miles versus 135 versus 250 etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,462 posts, read 5,706,736 times
Reputation: 6093
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonkid123 View Post
Umm, I do believe those numbers are per square mile, aka equal sized land mass (1 square mile)...
Not equal footprint though. For example, Boston density per square mile would drop in half if you assign the same footprint as NYC. Those numbers would only work if city limits were exactly the same size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2014, 02:11 PM
 
2,829 posts, read 3,173,099 times
Reputation: 2266
Have fun guys! This is really exciting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top