Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2008, 09:44 PM
 
1,071 posts, read 4,451,869 times
Reputation: 273

Advertisements

What are the most urban cities in America based on density and architecture, excluding downtowns?

Here's my list. What do you think?

1.New York
2.Chicago
3.Boston
4.San Francisco
5.Philadelphia
6.Baltimore
7.Cincinnati
8.Pittsburgh
9.Washington
10.St.Louis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2008, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Southeast Missouri
5,812 posts, read 18,826,047 times
Reputation: 3385
I agree for the most part.

St. Louis is gaining more of density back, especially in the North. A lot of the city is dense, though. I love the rowhouses that are right up against each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 12:48 AM
 
Location: Southeast New Mexico
12 posts, read 43,439 times
Reputation: 16
Well I gotta go with Los Angeles, CA for this one
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by hillside View Post
What are the most urban cities in America based on density and architecture, excluding downtowns?

Here's my list. What do you think?

1.New York
2.Chicago
3.Boston
4.San Francisco
5.Philadelphia
6.Baltimore
7.Cincinnati
8.Pittsburgh
9.Washington
10.St.Louis
Based on population density, San Francisco is 2nd. Architecture is totally arbitrary and based on personal opinion, but I will say that SF is probably the most easily identifiable city. There's just no mistaking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Metro DC
109 posts, read 469,590 times
Reputation: 55
I would probably move D.C. up a few spots ahead of Pittsburgh, Cinci, and Baltimore. Overall pretty accurate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Earth
1,478 posts, read 5,082,883 times
Reputation: 1440
Cincinnati does not even belong on that list. It's almost all suburbia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Cleveland Suburbs
2,554 posts, read 6,900,018 times
Reputation: 619
Cincinnati is an urban gem:
Cincinnati's Over-the-Rhine Blogger Tour to include new Cincinnati Skyline Photos - SkyscraperPage Forum
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 11:56 AM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,576,277 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by hillside View Post
What are the most urban cities in America based on density and architecture, excluding downtowns?

Here's my list. What do you think?

1.New York
2.Chicago
3.Boston
4.San Francisco
5.Philadelphia
6.Baltimore
7.Cincinnati
8.Pittsburgh
9.Washington
10.St.Louis
Please don't shot the messenger , but I am a bearer of bad news on what the most Urban cities In America Really Are.....I don't want to have you crying in your cereal this morning especially all of you LA haters ,Beat LA..
Beat LA....Beat LA, but here's goes.....
1.NYC 27,083 people square mile
2.Jersey City NJ 16,045 sq/mile
3.San Francisco CA 15,834 sq/mile
4.Chicago 12,470 sq/mile
5.Santa Ana CA 12,453 sq/mile
6.Boston 12,327 sq/mile
7.Miami FL 11,554 sq/mile
8.Newark NJ 11,400 sq/mile
9.Long Beach CA 9,149 sq/mile
10.Washington D.C. 9,015 sq/mile
11. Los Angeles 8,205 sq/mile
HONORABLE MENTION
12.Baltimore MD 8,058 sq/mile
13.Oakland CA 7,126 sq/mile
14.Minneapolis 7,067 sq/mile
15.Seattle 6,901 sq/miles
16.Detroit MI 6,850 sq/mile
I think that what you really are trying to get is America's Most Dynamize Urban Cities......Tell me if I'm Right Or Not....Urban Density Thrown Me For A Loop.....Some of the Least Urban Cities Oklahoma City 871 sq/mile El Paso TX
337 people sq/mile and last but not least (Anchorago AK) 187 people per square mile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
2,245 posts, read 7,190,410 times
Reputation: 869
First of all, I think it is best to talk about structural density and not population density, and there is no statistic for measuring structural density. Secondly, places like Pittsburgh are going to appear to have much less density because of white flight, and because the hills make it impossible to build on--Pittsburgh thus, has very dense "pockets" of urbanization that won't show up on any stat. The third thing I want to say is this: Cincinnati is a beautiful urban city that probably deserves to be in the top ten, but Cinci just doesn't have the magnitude of rowhouses that the Northeastern cities have. Yes, you have Over the Rhine and Pendleton, but those neighborhoods are so small compared to some of the neighborhoods in the east. With that being said, my opinion is as follows:

New York City
Boston
Chicago
Philadelphia
San Francisco
DC
Baltimore
Pittsburgh
New Orleans
Cincinnati
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2008, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Boston Metrowest (via the Philly area)
7,269 posts, read 10,588,790 times
Reputation: 8823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howest2008 View Post
Please don't shot the messenger , but I am a bearer of bad news on what the most Urban cities In America Really Are.....I don't want to have you crying in your cereal this morning especially all of you LA haters ,Beat LA..
Beat LA....Beat LA, but here's goes.....
1.NYC 27,083 people square mile
2.Jersey City NJ 16,045 sq/mile
3.San Francisco CA 15,834 sq/mile
4.Chicago 12,470 sq/mile
5.Santa Ana CA 12,453 sq/mile
6.Boston 12,327 sq/mile
7.Miami FL 11,554 sq/mile
8.Newark NJ 11,400 sq/mile
9.Long Beach CA 9,149 sq/mile

10.Washington D.C. 9,015 sq/mile
11. Los Angeles 8,205 sq/mile
You missed Philadelphia, which would come in 9th at 10,882.8 people/sq. mile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top