Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2017, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,678 posts, read 9,375,415 times
Reputation: 7246

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
I've heard the same thing from Texans. I lived in Texas years ago and it just wasn't my thing. Of the places I've been to in Texas, Austin would be my choice though.

I think that thing that's different about Raleigh than either Austin or Nashville is that it doesn't come with a branded identity and it's really a city that is "becoming a city" that matches its size. Raleigh 5 years ago is not Raleigh today and in a few more years, it will be a different place than it is today. As one of the fastest growing cities/metros nationally, there's a tremendous amount of activity in the entire metro but its core is probably going through the most significant transformation. All in all, Raleigh is attracting more than its fair share of newcomers and they tend to be well educated, talented, young and with disposable income.
And that is what many people fail to understand about Raleigh. The city is not obssessed with trying to brand itself as the place to be or stand on platitudes. While Austin and Nashville are busy maxing out their credit cards, Raleigh is dispersing all of her money into investment accounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2017, 03:53 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,143,800 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
And that is what many people fail to understand about Raleigh. The city is not obssessed with trying to brand itself as the place to be or stand on platitudes. While Austin and Nashville are busy maxing out their credit cards, Raleigh is dispersing all of her money into investment accounts.
Esse quam videri
To be, rather than to seem (NC's state motto)

That said, you are right. Raleigh tends to slog along and do its thing without creating fanfare about itself. It's the sort of place that people will soon ask, "where in the Hell did that come from?"

I think that there's also a mentality in the city that's akin to being a child from a large family. It has a focus not only on itself but, as the "oldest sibling" (or in this case, the largest sibling), it tends to keep a good portion of its attention on the health and welfare of the entire region. It's a city that likes regional cooperation, planning and success. For many Raleigh residents, including myself, it sometimes feels like the city is too demure in its position within the Triangle and the state, despite continuing to grow even larger than its neighbors. In the end, I am very happy with the city and it has a lot to offer and has an objectively measured balanced scorecard that is really hard to beat.

Last edited by rnc2mbfl; 04-25-2017 at 04:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2017, 05:03 PM
 
2,134 posts, read 2,115,306 times
Reputation: 2585
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
I've heard the same thing from Texans. I lived in Texas years ago and it just wasn't my thing. Of the places I've been to in Texas, Austin would be my choice though.

I think that thing that's different about Raleigh than either Austin or Nashville is that it doesn't come with a branded identity and it's really a city that is "becoming a city" that matches its size.
Raleigh 5 years ago is not Raleigh today and in a few more years, it will be a different place than it is today. As one of the fastest growing cities/metros nationally, there's a tremendous amount of activity in the entire metro but its core is probably going through the most significant transformation. All in all, Raleigh is attracting more than its fair share of newcomers and they tend to be well educated, talented, young and with disposable income. The market downtown is responding accordingly with new offerings and options that are really quite special. The transformation is so rapid that it seems like new offerings and options appear weekly and new ventures and projects are announced at a rapid pace.
It's the sort of place that either excites you as being part of that transformation, disappoints you that it's not all there yet but one can never consider it static. There's just too much transformation going on all over the place.
I agree that when a city is transforming it's both frustrating and exciting. Cheers to the future of Raleigh

Last edited by JMT; 04-25-2017 at 06:09 PM.. Reason: Dallas is not part of this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 07:00 AM
 
Location: OC
12,807 posts, read 9,532,543 times
Reputation: 10599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
And that is what many people fail to understand about Raleigh. The city is not obssessed with trying to brand itself as the place to be or stand on platitudes. While Austin and Nashville are busy maxing out their credit cards, Raleigh is dispersing all of her money into investment accounts.
How are Austin and Nashville maxing their credit cards?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2017, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,678 posts, read 9,375,415 times
Reputation: 7246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylord_Focker View Post
How are Austin and Nashville maxing their credit cards?
Explosive growth with no major infrastructure upgrades, massive gentrification with little to no plans for low income residents, majority white cultural options and attractions, favor suburban style development, depend on the city brand to attract new residents versus having a more substantive plan, using Atlanta as a model for development versus more urban/smart growth cities. Raleigh is no utopia from my experiences, but there are major differences in the mindset of the city versus the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2017, 02:03 AM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Explosive growth with no major infrastructure upgrades, massive gentrification with little to no plans for low income residents, majority white cultural options and attractions, favor suburban style development, depend on the city brand to attract new residents versus having a more substantive plan, using Atlanta as a model for development versus more urban/smart growth cities. Raleigh is no utopia from my experiences, but there are major differences in the mindset of the city versus the others.
Atlanta is actually a great model when it comes to the urbanization of Sunbelt cities with the Beltline, streetcar line, several new mixed-use developments, new TOD near MARTA stations, an increasing number of companies (re)locating near MARTA stations, substantial urban infill, new parks, etc. It's not 1987 anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2017, 07:14 AM
 
Location: OC
12,807 posts, read 9,532,543 times
Reputation: 10599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Explosive growth with no major infrastructure upgrades, massive gentrification with little to no plans for low income residents, majority white cultural options and attractions, favor suburban style development, depend on the city brand to attract new residents versus having a more substantive plan, using Atlanta as a model for development versus more urban/smart growth cities. Raleigh is no utopia from my experiences, but there are major differences in the mindset of the city versus the others.
Nashville maybe majority white options, but Austin is very multi-cultural. Austin citizens and its city council were very anti-growth, hell, they still may be. They do not give a rat's arse about catching Cincinnati or whoever is next up on the list.


Atlanta traffic is worse than Austin's and much worse than Nashville's. Atlanta is desperate for new residents. They even had a booth at Austin's SXSW highlighting why Atlanta is great for millennials. It would be great for Austin to have a transit system, but its downtown just isn't developed.

Explosive growth isn't on Austin, it's on the people that keep moving there. Best to stay away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2017, 10:31 AM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylord_Focker View Post
Nashville maybe majority white options, but Austin is very multi-cultural. Austin citizens and its city council were very anti-growth, hell, they still may be. They do not give a rat's arse about catching Cincinnati or whoever is next up on the list.


Atlanta traffic is worse than Austin's and much worse than Nashville's. Atlanta is desperate for new residents. They even had a booth at Austin's SXSW highlighting why Atlanta is great for millennials. It would be great for Austin to have a transit system, but its downtown just isn't developed.

Explosive growth isn't on Austin, it's on the people that keep moving there. Best to stay away.
Atlanta isn't "desperate for new residents"; it is still one of the fastest-growing metros in the country and continues to grow at a rapid pace. However, the fact that it was hit particularly hard during the recession and was slower to recover really cut into its appeal with millenials in particular, and that's a target group that the city is trying to curry more favor with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2017, 10:36 AM
 
2,134 posts, read 2,115,306 times
Reputation: 2585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Explosive growth with no major infrastructure upgrades, massive gentrification with little to no plans for low income residents, majority white cultural options and attractions, favor suburban style development, depend on the city brand to attract new residents versus having a more substantive plan, using Atlanta as a model for development versus more urban/smart growth cities. Raleigh is no utopia from my experiences, but there are major differences in the mindset of the city versus the others.
I agree with most of this, but I don't think the cities of Nashville & Austin are intentionally building suburban style developments within city limits. I can't speak for the Nashville development, but I know the Domain and Mueller urban town center developments in Austin are not TOD's like you find in Atlanta. Maybe that's what you meant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2017, 12:22 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,143,800 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTXman34 View Post
I agree with most of this, but I don't think the cities of Nashville & Austin are intentionally building suburban style developments within city limits. I can't speak for the Nashville development, but I know the Domain and Mueller urban town center developments in Austin are not TOD's like you find in Atlanta. Maybe that's what you meant?
Austin and especially Nashville are enormous in municipal land area and, as a result, are going to have a lot more suburban development within their city limits by default. This allows the cities to have had, and continue to have, some level of control over how a good chunk of their suburban areas develop(ed). Certainly over their entirety, TOD isn't possible but it is possible to have multimodal "transit" inclusive of walkability and bike infrastructure as key elements of decision making.

For comparison, here are the land areas that I found on Wiki. They may be different now for some/all of the cities but it gives a good comparison.

Nashville: 475 m2
Austin: 298 m2
Raleigh: 143 m2
Tampa: 113 m2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top