Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which City is a Blue Chip Stock in 2017?
Atlanta 15 22.73%
Boston 5 7.58%
Chicago 10 15.15%
Dallas 9 13.64%
DC 5 7.58%
Houston 1 1.52%
LA 2 3.03%
Miami 0 0%
San Francisco 3 4.55%
Seattle 16 24.24%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2017, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia/ Rehoboth Beach
313 posts, read 336,836 times
Reputation: 306

Advertisements

Philadelphia is the black swan , every year predictions are made and every year there's a black swan ,who seen that coming .The teck sector in Philly has transitioned from logarithmic growth too exponential growth in the job market , in spite of state and local gov. policies the tech sector will continue to flourish . The pluses far out weight the negatives .
The talent pool in Philly is only rivaled by Boston area, Philly is a close second . Another potential black swan is Pittsburgh .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2017, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,462 posts, read 5,707,576 times
Reputation: 6093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Truthfully, I don't think Philly, Boston, or Chicago should be on the poll since they are more mature, stable metros with average growth rates. You could make a similar case for NYC but since it's just a different beast altogether, it should probably be included.
But thats literally the definition of blue chip. Blue chip stocks are of large well established companies that reliably and steadily grow during good times and downturns. They do not have crazy double digit growth, they have steady "established" growth. Think Coca Cola and Caterpillar, not Facebook and Tesla.

Philly, Chicago, Boston, NYC would fit the bill very well. NYC is pretty much the definition of blue chip, since its "too big to fail", doesn't have crazy % growth since its starting with a large baseline, and doesn't decline nearly as sharp as other cities during recessions. NYC simply chugs along at #1 for the past 200 years, with slow but consistent gains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 11:34 AM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,933,711 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
But thats literally the definition of blue chip. Blue chip stocks are of large well established companies that reliably and steadily grow during good times and downturns. They do not have crazy double digit growth, they have steady "established" growth. Think Coca Cola and Caterpillar, not Facebook and Tesla.

Philly, Chicago, Boston, NYC would fit the bill very well. NYC is pretty much the definition of blue chip, since its "too big to fail", doesn't have crazy % growth since its starting with a large baseline, and doesn't decline nearly as sharp as other cities during recessions. NYC simply chugs along at #1 for the past 200 years.
You're right, but reading what the OP is getting at, it doesn't really sound like he's truly talking about "blue chip" cities but rather hot upstarts, relatively speaking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
135 posts, read 124,661 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
Why is Philadelphia left out of the poll?
Good question. I debated including Philadelphia. A mistake in leaving Philadelphia out of this poll could be warranted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
135 posts, read 124,661 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
But thats literally the definition of blue chip. Blue chip stocks are of large well established companies that reliably and steadily grow during good times and downturns. They do not have crazy double digit growth, they have steady "established" growth. Think Coca Cola and Caterpillar, not Facebook and Tesla.

Philly, Chicago, Boston, NYC would fit the bill very well. NYC is pretty much the definition of blue chip, since its "too big to fail", doesn't have crazy % growth since its starting with a large baseline, and doesn't decline nearly as sharp as other cities during recessions. NYC simply chugs along at #1 for the past 200 years, with slow but consistent gains.
Well stated. While you've accurately articulated a "blue chip", others see cities in a different vein. I would tend to agree with your assessment but tried to be city-data inclusive along the way. As many know, it's difficult to have a conversation/discussion about trends in cities if certain populaces are not included.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 04:25 PM
 
311 posts, read 314,004 times
Reputation: 351
No Philly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
135 posts, read 124,661 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjv007 View Post
No Philly
A mistake on my behalf. I respect Philadelphia immensely. I think it would actually be a Top 5 selection given the criteria.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 08:45 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
Seattle is part blue chip, part Nasdaq tech stock. It's supercharged right now because of tech, but also has a strong and surprisingly diversified base, as someone pointed out. Much of its economy is Boeing as well as retail HQs -- Amazon is a huge retailer, Costco is even bigger in that sector, and other companies like Nordstrom and Starbucks are key. The military is as big in the CSA as Boeing depending what you're counting. More fundamentally, we're a growing port of entry, tourist destination, and offshore real estate destination, and we're a port.

Ok, much of that will flux. As the most trade-dependent state, there's a lot of fear about what Trump could screw up on that front, especially with China. He's already attacked Boeing on multiple fronts, and he seems to hate Amazon. Boeing was already laying off many thousands. If tech drops (though it's based more closely on reality than in 2000) we'll both lose chunks of our own companies and some of the overflow from San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2017, 09:06 PM
 
429 posts, read 479,603 times
Reputation: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by RightonWalnut View Post

Seattle obviously has a strong market, but it's primary industry is tech. It's not diversified. Seattle could realistically see a slow down any year now. I don't think it will, but it's just an uncertainty that I wouldn't place my money in.
.
The biggest employer in the Seattle region - by far - is Boeing. They employ more people in the region than Microsoft, Amazon, Redfin, and Tableau combined.

Not to mention Starbucks HQ, Costco HQ, a major aerospace industry just to support Boeing, Nordstrom HQ, the Gates Foundation (the largest foundation in the world), a strong maritime industry.

Tech may be where Seattle's economy is growing but there are plenty of other thriving, more stable industries as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2017, 08:46 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,131 posts, read 39,380,764 times
Reputation: 21217
For the textbook definition, the Twin Cities fit the criteria pretty well. It's been robust and steady growth for the cities and the metro, in a metro and state that has a well-educated populace and steady government that has allowed for decent infrastructural development to go with the growth and a highly diversified economy that's less subject to large shocks from any single industry tanking. The Twin Cities sort of slowly snuck up as a major city/metropolitan area without much hype (except for Prince, but that makes sense as Prince is amazing).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top