Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-09-2017, 06:47 PM
 
7,019 posts, read 3,745,193 times
Reputation: 3257

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
NYC is bigger, we get that. How many different ways does it have to be said????? No one has tried to say it's not. This is getting ridiculous, as every possible angle is tried, by those who seem to desperately need to drive this point home. Was that the point of this thread, anyway? No, it wasn't. It's just always something that, I guess, we need to be reminded of, because we wouldn't know, otherwise. Pure, redundant silliness. Give the OP some credit...I'm sure he/she knows NYC is bigger.
Of course I know NYC is bigger and basically wanted to know if downtown Chicago offered something similar to Manhattan like Toronto. And it was confirmed that downtown chicago offer tourists anything similar to Manhattan but it does offers three things to tourists that manhattan doesn't which makes me excited for my trip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2017, 07:05 PM
 
Location: NYC
2,545 posts, read 3,294,625 times
Reputation: 1924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lansing_Born View Post
OK, so fine. We've established that you don't care about density, urbanity or vibrancy.

Then what are we talking about, exactly? Can't someone argue that Peoria has a better core than Paris? What is the point about comparing urban cores if we don't care about urbanity? That's the whole point, no?
You may have missed gladhands' post above where he opined that there is no difference in urbanity between Manhattan and Chicago. There is only a difference in "housing density", which is apparently just a number on a piece of paper that has no relevance to any other urban characteristics
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 07:13 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,955,059 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lansing_Born View Post
OK, so fine. We've established that you don't care about density, urbanity or vibrancy.

Then what are we talking about, exactly? Can't someone argue that Peoria has a better core than Paris? What is the point about comparing urban cores if we don't care about urbanity? That's the whole point, no?
This is incredibly facile and betrays a lack of knowledge of both cities. I'm of the belief that there's a threshold at which cities/neighborhoods reach peak urbanity, and increased density only makes the area more crowded...not more urban. I don't believe midtown is any more "urban" than Park Slope, and I certainly don't believe Manhattan is more urban than the areas of Chicago we're discussing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 07:34 PM
 
4,087 posts, read 3,238,711 times
Reputation: 3058
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
This is incredibly facile and betrays a lack of knowledge of both cities. I'm of the belief that there's a threshold at which cities/neighborhoods reach peak urbanity, and increased density only makes the area more crowded...not more urban. I don't believe midtown is any more "urban" than Park Slope, and I certainly don't believe Manhattan is more urban than the areas of Chicago we're discussing.
Yes, there is certain point density becomes like traffic-jams. But with people. They dislike tourist who dare stop to look up. You no longer have a quiet block to go home too unless locked in your apartment. You rush but still another sees you in the way. Aesthetics are unimportant to add green or flowers because you don't take the time to enjoy passing them and trees are in the way. You need room for trash bags. (I jest).
But the point is density can reach overkill too. Then it no longer adds. Its threshold is reached and a downside can begin. My point in Manhattan can lose aspects we are to see its greatest asset in a degree of over-crowding that matches the traffic-jam on the streets. You just have no time to stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 07:57 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,955,059 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lansing_Born View Post
Midtown is like 100x more urban than Park Slope, obviously. Giant supertall canyons of towers packed with mobs of people are just a tad more urban than quiet leafy brownstone blocks with back yards.

Your definition of "urbanity" doesn't seem to make any sense. It seems to be "whatever you feel like" or something.

How do you define urbanity? How can a place with x density be as urban as a place with 4x density? Is Chicago as urban as Orlando too?
Midtown and Park Slope are simply different types of urban neighborhoods. Some urban neighborhoods are residential, some are business districts, some-mixed use. Midtown is a business district with some residences. Park Slope is a residential neighborhood with some businesses. The central part of the Village (around NYU is probably the best example of true mixed-use.

You seem to place a lot of importance on high rise buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 08:34 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,955,059 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lansing_Born View Post
You didn't address anything I wrote.

Urbanity has little to do with highrises, or mixed uses. Even suburban sprawl is sometimes highrise and mixed use.

If you think Midtown and Park Slope are the same in terms of density, then I can reasonably say that Tampa and Chicago are the same in terms of density.

After all, they're just "different types of urban neighborhoods" as you say.
I never said Park Slope and Midtown had the same density. I same they are equally urban.

I've never been to Tampa, so I can't speak on it's urbanity. You seem intent on arguing that density and urbanity, are one-in-the same. While density is a component of urbanity, not the totality. Favelas are incredibly dense, but I wouldn't call them urban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 08:37 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 3,749,903 times
Reputation: 1967
What a dumb thread. You can break Midtown Manhattan up into 3 sections and it is still better than Chicago. Now Chicago has a great downtown, number 2 in the US but Manhattan is just on another level
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 08:55 PM
 
7,019 posts, read 3,745,193 times
Reputation: 3257
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldm View Post
What a dumb thread. You can break Midtown Manhattan up into 3 sections and it is still better than Chicago. Now Chicago has a great downtown, number 2 in the US but Manhattan is just on another level
Chicago still offers tourists 3 things that Manhattan is unable to but of course still a great city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 05:53 AM
PDF
 
11,395 posts, read 13,409,287 times
Reputation: 6707
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneymkt View Post
Chicago still offers tourists 3 things that Manhattan is unable to but of course still a great city
And what are those 3 things?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2017, 06:06 AM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,955,059 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDF View Post
And what are those 3 things?
Only things I can come up with are a beach, and a river running through downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top