Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2017, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,732,359 times
Reputation: 10592

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
I believe the census counts Pakistani as Asian, but not Iranians. Also interesting is that none of the former Soviet 'stans in Central Asia are considered Asian.
This is correct. Iranians, Iraqis, and Arabs are considered white but Pakistanis, Afghans, and people from the "stans" are considered Asian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2017, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,921,829 times
Reputation: 4942
Originally Arabs and Armenians were not considered White, I guess they would have been Asian?, but they appealed to the government and convinced them that they were white, they did this so they wouldn't be discriminated against. Other groups tried as well, but ended up failing such as the Japanese. Whiteness was less about race, and more about class and status back then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 10:56 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys fan in Houston View Post
This is correct. Iranians, Iraqis, and Arabs are considered white but Pakistanis, Afghans, and people from the "stans" are considered Asian.
I believe the stans are not counted as Asians in the census, but as white. It's pretty exciting.

If they were to be counted as Asians, then NYC's Asian population gets a bump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Southwest Suburbs
4,593 posts, read 9,192,619 times
Reputation: 3293
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94 View Post
Originally Arabs and Armenians were not considered White, I guess they would have been Asian?, but they appealed to the government and convinced them that they were white, they did this so they wouldn't be discriminated against. Other groups tried as well, but ended up failing such as the Japanese. Whiteness was less about race, and more about class and status back then.
I think it was the Syrians who appealed to court for the 'white' status, which started the whole thing of Arabs being white in the US. The reason for this was because at one time the US didn't allow anyone to immigrate here unless they were European white (including Sicilians, Greeks, Jews). I think even Indians at one point were going to be classified as white, though they probably still are classified as 'Caucasoid' by scientists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 01:57 PM
 
39 posts, read 57,452 times
Reputation: 34
The reason Minneapolis/Saint Paul has so many "other Asian" is because of all the Hmong, and to a lesser extent, Laotians and Cambodians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 02:11 PM
 
Location: BMORE!
10,106 posts, read 9,956,241 times
Reputation: 5779
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
So other "Asian" does not count for Arabs etc? I'm asking with regards to what was said about Detroit which would rank higher if so.

Also if these are done by CSA then Washington DC's percentage should be much higher by MSA.
Also, if going by CSA, Baltimore is a tier 1 Asian city with 700K+ within its metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 02:29 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by KodeBlue View Post
Also, if going by CSA, Baltimore is a tier 1 Asian city with 700K+ within its metro.
That is interesting though--does Baltimore and its immediate surroundings have any sizable Asian communities or neighborhoods? What are those communities/neighborhoods?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 02:37 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,634,523 times
Reputation: 13630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys fan in Houston View Post
It doesn't include Honolulu because I'm not 100% where it would fall.
Personally I'd put it at the top and ahead of all of these cities simply because of how overwhelmingly Asian it is and how integrated those cultures are into society there. It loses points for size and possibly diversity (lack of South Asians) but no other region comes close to it otherwise imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,732,359 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
Personally I'd put it at the top and ahead of all of these cities simply because of how overwhelmingly Asian it is and how integrated those cultures are into society there. It loses points for size and possibly diversity (lack of South Asians) but no other region comes close to it otherwise imo.
Thats the problem. Its Asian community is almost entirely Japanese and Filipino. There is very little of anything else. It would be hard for me to place it in Tier 1 for that reason, but maybe in tier 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2017, 07:27 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,634,523 times
Reputation: 13630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboys fan in Houston View Post
Thats the problem. Its Asian community is almost entirely Japanese and Filipino. There is very little of anything else. It would be hard for me to place it in Tier 1 for that reason, but maybe in tier 2.
Not really, Japanese and Filipino's might dominate the Asian population but the percentages of other Asian groups stack up quite well with other "Tier 1" cities.

Chinese
Honolulu: 5.4%
LA: 2.9%
SF: 7.9%
NY: 3.1%

Korean
Honolulu: 2.3%
LA: 1.9%
SF: 1.0%
NY: 1.0%

Vietnamese
Honolulu: .9%
LA: 1.7%
SF: 2.5%
NY: .2%

Other Asian
Honolulu: 4.4%
LA: 1.3%
SF: 1.7%
NY: 1.1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top