Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Overall best foodie location?
Toronto 50 72.46%
Washington D.C. 19 27.54%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-30-2018, 07:33 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,961,697 times
Reputation: 8436

Advertisements

Food Scene: Toronto versus Washington D.C.

1. More variety in food choices

2. More of a reputation for being a foodie destination

3. Styles and innovations originating in the area

4. Quality of food

5. Quality of atmosphere

Overall choice?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2018, 07:49 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,960,223 times
Reputation: 9226
Toronto, and it isn’t particularly close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 08:24 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Toronto, and it isn’t particularly close.
Where's Toronto's Michelin guide? Oops that's right, they're not on it. Thanks.


https://guide.michelin.com/city_selector
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 08:50 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 6,960,223 times
Reputation: 9226
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Where's Toronto's Michelin guide? Oops that's right, they're not on it. Thanks.


https://guide.michelin.com/city_selector
Neither New Orleans nor Los Angeles has one either. I suppose DC is a better food city than those, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 08:54 PM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,916,343 times
Reputation: 4528
This is going to be a beat down, and rightfully so.

Toronto by far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 09:06 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Neither New Orleans nor Los Angeles has one either. I suppose DC is a better food city than those, too.
No se. Would have to sit down and spend significant time eating in each to find out. How else do you think they came up with the guide? From thin air?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2018, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Berkeley, CA
662 posts, read 1,281,680 times
Reputation: 938
Having a Michelin guide in your city means you have a lot of rich people eating at select expense account restaurants. It means you have a lot of expensive french restaurants, but it doesn’t say much else about your city’s food scene.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 06:23 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtran103 View Post
Having a Michelin guide in your city means you have a lot of rich people eating at select expense account restaurants. It means you have a lot of expensive french restaurants, but it doesn’t say much else about your city’s food scene.
Fair enough, so we're admitting Toronto lacks that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,982 posts, read 2,089,310 times
Reputation: 2185
Misclicked on mobile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 09:56 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,916,343 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Fair enough, so we're admitting Toronto lacks that.
I'm not sure you have a basic understanding of the way the Michelin Guide works. Nor did I until more recently. Quite literally, they don't evaluate restaurants in any other US cities with the exception of NYC, Chicago, San Francisco, and now DC. It is based on inspector's preference, which largely follows sociodemographics and perceived accessibility. It's also largely based on size and volume and, in turn, revenue of a restaurant or restaurant scene. Basically, they are combing through areas where ultra high dining is part of the culture. That's why places like NYC, Paris, Chicago are feature cities in the rankings.

That's not LA, and to be honest, I'm not sure it's Toronto either. But, I find something like authentic Central American street fare in LA, or an awesome Fesenjoon dish in Toronto, far more interesting and impactful than some overpriced squid over a vegetable puree. And that is why Toronto, LA, New Orleans are revered for their food scene, and DC and San Francisco really aren't. Or, aren't traditionally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top